News: 0180828626

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Minecraft Java Is Switching From OpenGL To Vulkan (gamingonlinux.com)

(Thursday February 19, 2026 @10:30PM (BeauHD) from the what-to-expect dept.)


Minecraft: Java Edition is [1]switching its rendering backend from OpenGL to Vulkan as part of the [2]upcoming Vibrant Visuals update , aiming for both better performance and modern graphics features across platforms like Linux and macOS (via translation layers). GamingOnLinux reports:

> For modders, they're suggesting they start making preparations to move away from OpenGL: "Switching from OpenGL to Vulkan will have an impact on the mods that currently use OpenGL for rendering, and we anticipate that updating from OpenGL to Vulkan will take modders more effort than the updates you undertake for each of our releases. To start with, we recommend our modding community look at moving away from OpenGL usage. We encourage authors to try to reuse as much of the internal rendering APIs as possible, to make this transition as easy as possible. If that is not sufficient for your needs, then come and talk to us!"

>

> It does mean that players on really old devices that don't support Vulkan will be left out, but Vulkan has been supported going back to some pretty old GPUs. You've got time though, as they'll be rolling out Vulkan alongside OpenGL in snapshots (development releases) "sometime over the summer." You'll be able to toggle between them during the testing period until Mojang believe it's ready. OpenGL will be entirely removed eventually once they're happy with performance and stability.



[1] https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/02/minecraft-java-is-switching-from-opengl-to-vulkan-for-the-vibrant-visuals-update/

[2] https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/another-step-towards-vibrant-visuals-for-java-edition



so? (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

Fuck Microsoft.

That is all.

No wait, fuck Notch too, he said he would open source MC when he was done working on it.

Re: (Score:2)

by bussdriver ( 620565 )

His choice. His right to change his mind for like a billion $$$. What nerve; you are entitled to his work? Did he PROMISE or just openly express a passing feeling? Sign a contract? Make a conditional deal with supporters? Falsely advertise? Maybe, I don't know.

It's just a stupid game. It's not like you built infrastructure around him and made that decision on his word that he'd open source it later.

Re: (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

Nah, I'm 100% unsurprised and I probably would have done the same thing faced with the big stupid money. But then people would be justified in saying fuck me.

Re: (Score:2)

by im_thatoneguy ( 819432 )

Microsoft is adapting to Apple dropping OpenGL support.

From TFA:

> in the future OpenGL will not run at all on macOS devices

But fuck Microsoft?

Re: (Score:2)

by Xenx ( 2211586 )

Except, Microsoft is switching from one unsupported render engine to another unsupported render engine. Either one would require a translation layer to work.

Microsoft break things again (Score:1)

by SmaryJerry ( 2759091 )

Can anyone confirm if this will break all old mods? Microsoft has a habit if ignoring the important things so they can fix something that isn't broken. The mod library is the most important thing in Minecraft for most long term players, if that breaks they are literally destroying their own community.

Re: (Score:2)

by thegarbz ( 1787294 )

> Can anyone confirm if this will break all old mods?

Everyone can confirm this, but I think it's time we let you learn it yourself. Click the second link in TFS and do your own homework. It's right there spelled out for you.

Re: (Score:2)

by Adrian Harvey ( 6578 )

Obviously it won't break all mods. Most mods don't directly use the rendering system at all, and only a very few will do things directly in OpenGL. It will likely affect mods that change the rendering or visuals in some way, like Iris Shaders or Optifine.

Mojang seem like they are aware of the value of the modding community more than many game makers. The very fact that they are signalling this change in advance is an indicator of this!

Oh no (Score:2)

by Bahbus ( 1180627 )

Minecraft is an unoptimized, piece of steamy shit. The modding community of Minecraft is toxic and lazy.

Re: (Score:2)

by RitchCraft ( 6454710 )

LOL, I hear ya. My son was working on some MC mods a few years ago for friends of his. He pretty much summed up his experience with MC and the community the same way.

Notch (Score:2)

by symbolset ( 646467 ) *

Got his. That was the day to walk away.

Based on how crap Minecraft looks (Score:2)

by Gavino ( 560149 )

I'm surprised it even requires 3D acceleration.

With the news that Nancy Reagan has referred to an astrologer when planning
her husband's schedule, and reports of Californians evacuating Los Angeles
on the strength of a prediction from a sixteenth-century physician and
astrologer Michel de Notredame, the image of the U.S. as a scientific and
technological nation has taking a bit of a battering lately. Sadly, such
happenings cannot be dismissed as passing fancies. They are manifestations
of a well-established "anti-science" tendency in the U.S. which, ultimately,
could threaten the country's position as a technological power. . . . The
manifest widespread desire to reject rationality and substitute a series
of quasirandom beliefs in order to understand the universe does not augur
well for a nation deeply concerned about its ability to compete with its
industrial equals. To the degree that it reflects the thinking of a
significant section of the public, this point of view encourages ignorance
of and, indeed, contempt for science and for rational methods of approaching
truth. . . . It is becoming clear that if the U.S. does not pick itself up
soon and devote some effort to educating the young effectively, its hope of
maintaining a semblance of leadership in the world may rest, paradoxically,
with a new wave of technically interested and trained immigrants who do not
suffer from the anti-science disease rampant in an apparently decaying society.
-- Physicist Tony Feinberg, in "New Scientist," May 19, 1988