Kalshi Prediction Markets Match or Beat Traditional Forecasting Tools For Macro Indicators, NBER Study Finds (nber.org)
- Reference: 0180762144
- News link: https://slashdot.org/story/26/02/09/1957211/kalshi-prediction-markets-match-or-beat-traditional-forecasting-tools-for-macro-indicators-nber-study-finds
- Source link: https://www.nber.org/papers/w34702
The study compared Kalshi-implied forecasts for the federal funds rate, CPI inflation and unemployment against the New York Fed's Survey of Market Expectations and Bloomberg consensus. Kalshi's modal forecast correctly predicted the federal funds rate on the day before every FOMC meeting since 2022, something neither the survey nor fed funds futures achieved. For headline CPI, Kalshi's median and mode produced a statistically significant improvement over Bloomberg consensus.
Kalshi also fills a gap no other financial market covers: real-time probability distributions for GDP growth, core CPI, unemployment, and payrolls. The paper documented how these distributions shift in response to macro news -- positive CPI surprises moved the mean of the fed funds rate distribution four times more than negative ones. Trading volumes on the platform have grown to nearly 100 million contracts for a single FOMC meeting, supported by liquidity from Susquehanna, Citadel, and Two Sigma.
[1] https://www.nber.org/papers/w34702
Time of prediction (Score:3)
The New York Fed's Survey of Market Expectations and Bloomberg consensus are surveys filled out 1-2 weeks before the rate announcement. It's not a surprise for a daily Kalshi guess to be more accurate the day before the announcement. It would be more impressive if the Kalshi market were as accurate 1-2 weeks before the rate announcement, as that would be a more apples-to-apples comparison.
Insider trading (Score:2)
Its funny how insider trading predictions are so insanely accurate, hmm?
Re: Insider trading (Score:2)
Yes, we've heard of the amazing returns on investment of the us Congress people, a truly insightful bunch there.
Insider trading? (Score:1)
There is a large number of people with first-hand privileged knowledge of upcoming events that you could probably make a case that increased accuracy is due to insider trading.
Re: (Score:2)
Jinx
Economists know nothing. Self-demonstrating. (Score:2)
Not just in the headline of tfa.
Here's a neat little gem:
> ...real-time probability distributions for GDP growth, core CPI, unemployment, and payrolls.
How in the fuck would such a thing be meaningful? It's not like there's an ensemble of parallel universe economies out there you could interrogate with your handy dandy interdimensional portal to validate the quality of this probability distribution. There's exactly one economy and exactly one right now and exactly one actual growth rate, cpi, etc.
There *is* such a thing as an error distribution of an estimator for any particular statistic. But this
124% probability? (Score:2)
Hey, if somebody really understands what calculation they're doing to measure "accuracy," I think a brief explanation would be very welcome. I'll admit I gave up when their top-line, explicit example involved a pair of contracts selling for .67 and .57- I'd say spending $1.24 for $1 is the very definition of an inaccurate market.
Metrification decreases accuracy (Score:2)
The second a measuring method becomes officially used, it drops in accuracy.
When something is not official, no one tries to game the system. You get more honest answers and nobody is spending millions/billions of dollars to get the 'right' answer.
John Brunner would be proud (Score:2)
These are all basically following the model of the Delphi Polls from his novel, "The Shockwave Rider". The only step left is for the government to start prioritizing funding for projects based on what people think is likely to happen and we'll be all the way there.
Those with the best models (Score:1)
keep it to themselves, as that's how they make money. Thus, comparing this to public models doesn't mean a whole lot, only that they have a bigger than average mouth.
Disaster futures are now a thing :o (Score:2)
Disaster futures are now a thing :o