News: 0180703906

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

'Reverse Solar Panel' Generates Electricity at Night (extremetech.com)

(Saturday January 31, 2026 @11:34AM (BeauHD) from the deep-space-applicable dept.)


Researchers at the University of New South Wales are [1]developing a "reverse solar panel " that generates small amounts of electricity at night by harvesting infrared heat radiated from Earth. "In the past, scientists have demonstrated that a ' [2]thermoradiative diode ' can convert infrared radiation directly into electricity; when used to convert heat from Earth, they exploit the temperature difference between Earth and the night sky, generating a current directly from heat," notes ExtremeTech. "This approach completely eliminates the need for heat to generate steam, though the resulting capacity is fairly low." From the report:

> The researchers estimate they could generate only about a watt per square meter, which isn't much. One reason for the low output is that the Earth's atmosphere lessens the heat differential that drives the generative process; in space, though, that's not an issue.

>

> Now, researchers believe that the ability to generate power in the moments between direct sunlight could help power satellites. That could be especially true in deep space, where periods without sunlight can be longer, and sunlight is often weaker; in these situations, losing electricity to heat loss is unacceptable.

>

> Many satellites already use heat to generate electricity, though with a much more rarified "thermoelectric generator" that uses rare, expensive materials like plutonium to create heat. With thermoradiative diodes, the heat source can be the Sun-warmed body of the satellite itself.



[1] https://www.extremetech.com/science/reverse-solar-panel-generates-electricity-at-night

[2] https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/niac-poster-polly-thermoradiative-cell-power-tagged.pdf?emrc=489fb1



peltier/thermocouple? (Score:3)

by EkriirkE ( 1075937 )

They just reinvented the thermocouple

Re: (Score:2)

by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

It's an interesting idea, but pointless given how cheap batteries have become.

Re: (Score:1)

by mrbester ( 200927 )

I have a watch that powered by one of those.

RTG (Score:3)

by hackertourist ( 2202674 )

> Many satellites already use heat to generate electricity, though with a much more rarified "thermoelectric generator" that uses rare, expensive materials like plutonium to create heat

The USA and USSR have launched a few dozen spacecraft with RTGs, out of more than 12,000 satellites launched in total. That's not "many".

There's a blond joke in there (Score:1)

by Tablizer ( 95088 )

somewhere

I'd like to see more stuff on this with heat... (Score:1)

by ctilsie242 ( 4841247 )

If this is done right, it would allow nuclear reactors to not need to push water through steam turbines, but just have the heat from the cooling solution be directly converted to energy, which adds a lot of efficiency in the process, and fewer moving parts. I'm hoping for progress on this front, as it is useful not just for energy from residual heat, but for a number of other applications.

Re: (Score:3)

by Dan East ( 318230 )

Whenever they invent this I hope they name it the Thermoelectric Generator. Although in actuality I think you're hoping for something magical that can overcome the second law of thermodynamics and do this with extreme efficiency.

Not a "reverse solar panel" (Score:3, Informative)

by greytree ( 7124971 )

A solar panel converts sunlight to electricity.

A reverse solar panel would convert electricity to sunlight.

Stupid headline

Re: (Score:2)

by greytree ( 7124971 )

Ah.

So that's where they have "Reverse Christmas", on the beach ? Got it.

Down Under (Score:2)

by cstacy ( 534252 )

It's a Down Under panel.

Their drains swirl the other way, too!

Resulting capacity is fairly low (Score:3)

by olddoc ( 152678 )

There are 4047 square meters in one acre. If I had a home with a heat pump that consumed 4kW I could run it with one acre of these panels - although I probably couldn't start it up. There won't be much use for this technology on Earth.

Re: (Score:2)

by Geoffrey.landis ( 926948 )

> There are 4047 square meters in one acre. If I had a home with a heat pump that consumed 4kW I could run it with one acre of these panels - although I probably couldn't start it up. There won't be much use for this technology on Earth.

Yes, they're more useful in space. Here's a a presentation I did a few years back: [1]https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/cita... [nasa.gov]

[1] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230011202/downloads/Landis-EandM%20Presentation.pdf

Light bulb (Score:2)

by dave314159259 ( 1107469 )

A light bulb is a reverse solar panel:

Solar panel: absorb light, produce electricity.

Light bulb: absorb electricity, produce light.

Re: (Score:3)

by Geoffrey.landis ( 926948 )

> A light bulb is a reverse solar panel: Solar panel: absorb light, produce electricity. Light bulb: absorb electricity, produce light.

More specifically, a LED is a reverse solar panel, and in fact, if you power a solar cell backwards, they emit light (electroluminescence).

But thermoradiative cells are reversed in a different way, solar cells are essentially carnot engines if you think about them right: Solar light at 6000K in ("hot side"), waste heat out ("cold side") and electrical power produced. In a perfect carnot cycle, the hot and cold sides can be swapped. Thermoradiative cells switch the hot and cold side: heat in ("hot side"), li

Quotes me... not. (Score:2)

by Geoffrey.landis ( 926948 )

Damn. This seems to be a shortened version of the CNN article, [1]https://www.cnn.com/science/ni... [cnn.com] except they left out the second half of the article, where the CNN reporter includes several quotes from me.

I guess my fifteen minutes of fame got cut down to thirty seconds. At least the second link in the summary mentions me.

[1] https://www.cnn.com/science/night-time-solar-energy-power-satellites-spc

Re: (Score:2)

by tfranzese ( 869766 )

You got me to read the article. More interesting than the snarky comments here.

I disagree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to
tell such LIES!