Kernel Community Drafts a Plan For Replacing Linus Torvalds (zdnet.com)
- Reference: 0180680928
- News link: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/26/01/28/2253239/kernel-community-drafts-a-plan-for-replacing-linus-torvalds
- Source link: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-community-project-continuity-plan-for-replacing-linus-torvalds/
> The new " [2]plan for a plan ," drafted by longtime kernel contributor Dan Williams, was discussed at the latest [3]Linux Kernel Maintainer Summit in Tokyo, where he introduced it as "an uplifting subject tied to our eventual march toward death." Torvalds added, in our conversation, that "part of the reason it came up this time around was that my previous contract with Linux Foundation ended Q3 last year, and people on the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board had been aware of that. Of course, they were also aware that we'd renewed the contract, but it meant that it had been discussed."
>
> The plan stops short of naming a single heir. Instead, it creates an explicit process for selecting one or more maintainers to take over the top-level Linux repository in a worst-case or orderly-transition scenario, including convening a conclave to weigh options and maximize long-term project health. One maintainer in Tokyo jokingly suggested that the group, like the conclave that selects a new pope, be locked in a room and that a puff of white smoke be sent out when a decision was reached.
>
> The document frames this as a way to protect against the classic "bus factor" problem. That is, what happens to a project if its leader is hit by a bus? Torvalds' central role today means the project currently assumes a bus-factor of one, where a single person's exit could, in theory, destabilize merges and final releases. In practice, as Torvalds and other top maintainers have discussed, the job of top penguin would almost certainly currently go to Greg Kroah-Hartman, the stable-branch Linux kernel maintainer.
Responding to the suggestion that the backup replacement would be Greg KH, Torvalds said: "But the thing is, Greg hasn't always been Greg. Before Greg, there was Andrew Morton and Alan Cox. After Greg, there will be Shannon and Steve. The real issue is you have to have a person or a group of people that the development community can trust, and part of trust is fundamentally about having been around for long enough that people know how you work, but long enough does not mean to be 30 years."
[1] https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-community-project-continuity-plan-for-replacing-linus-torvalds/
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/102606402f4f5943266160e263c450fdfe4dd981#diff-6c81210e8795b03502471e1435cac0763110f72b823038bd0033eb617c15ab8d
[3] https://events.linuxfoundation.org/linux-kernel-maintainer-summit/#link=%7B%22linkText%22:%22Linux%20Kernel%20Maintainer%20Summit%22,%22target%22:%22_blank%22,%22href%22:%22https://events.linuxfoundation.org/linux-kernel-maintainer-summit/%22,%22role%22:%22standard%22,%22absolute%22:%22%22%7D
Confusing. (Score:2)
Where's the clickbait headline that reads, "Kernel Cummunity Hatches Plans to Ditch Linux Torvolds"? Did the punch-up guy call in sick?
Making the conclave go fast (Score:1)
If there is a conclave, they should only be allowed to use paper/pencil and other analog equipment and a computer that has only Microsoft Windows installed and no way to install anything else.
*horrors*
Re:Making the conclave go fast (Score:5, Funny)
I hope that they announce the new kernel maintainer with a ritual burning of a Microsoft Surface laptop with Copilot AI!
Once we see the white smoke from the Lithium fire, only then will be know that the reign of the new leader of open source has begun!
Corporate governance 101 (Score:3)
Business continuity is a critical part of any serious larger organization, and the board needs to have a plan in the case the leadership has a bus event. While the kernel did have various plans, formalization is just part of the proper process of the board. While some such plans are not public (we never saw Berkshire Hathaway's plans, but Warren Buffet said they existed (although i am going to guess they changed over the years, as Charlie Munger was no longer a viable candidate)), they still must exist.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. This is nothing special, just some smart people planning ahead. Also, Linus (or any other core-team member) may become unavailable long-term for a number of reasons. Smart people plan for that, wayyyyy ahead of it becoming urgent.
Deport (Score:2)
His claim for asylum based on Finland forcing him to use Windows is no longer valid. It was shaky at best in the first place.
I nominate... (Score:2, Interesting)
...Lennart Poettering. The Linux will be insured to grow capably under his caring and kind tutelage. Ideally he adds DirectX and helps unify the current fractuous state of Linux into a stable, standardized monoculture via an MS Linux distro.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
> Just one rule - No Republicans!
yea - wouldn't want things getting done, would we?
Re: (Score:3)
"We need a leader that will do FOSS like a BUSINESS!"