Richard Stallman Critiques AI, Connected Cars, Smartphones, and DRM (youtube.com)
- Reference: 0180654796
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/01/25/1930244/richard-stallman-critiques-ai-connected-cars-smartphones-and-drm
- Source link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDxPJs1EPS4
Speaking about AI, Stallman warned that "nowadays, people often use the term artificial intelligence for things that aren't intelligent at all..." He makes a point of calling large language models "generators" because "They generate text and they don't understand really what that text means." (And they also make mistakes "without batting a virtual eyelash. So you can't trust anything that they generate.") Stallman says "Every time you call them AI, you are endorsing the claim that they are intelligent and they're not. So let's let's refuse to do that."
"So I've come up with the term Pretend Intelligence. We could call it PI. And if we start saying this more often, we might help overcome this marketing hype campaign that wants people to trust those systems, and trust their lives and all their activities to the control of those systems and the big companies that develop and control them."
"By the way, as far as I can tell, none of them is free software."
When it comes to today's cars, Stallman says they contain "malicious functionalities... Cars should not be connected. They should not upload anything." (He adds that "I am hoping to find a skilled mechanic to work with me in a project to make disconnected cars.")
And later Stallman calls the smartphone "an Orwellian tracking and surveillance device," saying he refuses to own one. (An advantage of free software is that it allows the removal of malicious functionalities.)
Stallman spoke for about 53 minutes — but then answered questions for nearly 90 minutes longer. [2]Here's some of the highlights ...
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDxPJs1EPS4
[2] https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/01/25/1930244/richard-stallman-critiques-ai-connected-cars-smartphones-and-drm#Richard_Stallman_answers_questions
He's the strange paranoid crackpot (Score:5, Insightful)
Who always seems to be right.
Re:He's the strange paranoid crackpot (Score:4, Informative)
And he is the only one to be consequent. Most people here know about enshittification, know why ToS are unfair to users and hugely in favor of companies and know that most proprietary software includes anti-features working against the users. Many here are old enough to remember when virus scanners found "adware" and know every app does not only contain ad frameworks, but also tracking frameworks and sometimes other ways to monetize your device.
Still most choose convenience and just accept it the way it is. You may have a custom ROM for Android, but did you uninstall the Playstore? And if you did, are you still avoiding any non-free apk? What about your Google account? Dropbox? Some of the Meta social media? Windows? Apple? I don't know if I know about any paranoid nerd but Stallman who 100% stands by his word and manages to avoid all these things.
Paid speaker ? (Score:2)
It would help to know how much he was paid to give the speech.
It would help if these personality X made comment about topic Y during a speech included how much the person was give the speech.
" Meanwhile, speaking is my main source of income, and the extra price of a business class ticket would be a lot more useful for me if I can spend it on something else" from [1]http://xahlee.info/emacs/misc/... [xahlee.info]
Asking for the same reason why nearly every memoir by someone exiting a political organization, news organization,
[1] http://xahlee.info/emacs/misc/rms_speech_requirement.html
Re: (Score:2)
He's Stallman. If you don't know anything about him, you must have lived under a rock for the last 40 years. Please hand over your geek card to the attendant at the door, and walk two doors to the left. The hermit support group has already started.
Re: (Score:2)
Repeat this after me, 5 times, please. “Outside of their field of expertise, scientists and engineers are no better than laypeople.”
You are now a better person.
Stallman’s published writing on the topic of CSAM suggests that, no, he’s most *definitely* not always right.
I respect Stallman for a bunch of reasons. He’s probably got a solid 15 or 20 IQ points on me, and his views are worth considering. But that doesn’t mean that he’s always right. His extrem
Re: (Score:2)
"Pretend Intelligence" is what the word "Artificial Intelligence" already means.
Re: (Score:2)
Stallman being a contrarian.
A more notable point is that while she said that Epstein had instructed her to have sex with Marvin Minsky, she didn't conclude that with a statement that she actually did.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, it took him a conversation w/ a victim of sexual abuse for him to finally get that pedophilia is actually sexual abuse. I'm glad that the FSF kicked him off the top of their board, although he's back as an ordinary member
Getting curmudgeonly? (Score:1)
A smartphone is a handheld ARM-based computer with crappy controls and an unusual network adapter, a cellular modem. All but a few of them come with shitty closed OSes, but the same is true of desktop computers. He should try a Purism Librem 5 for example.
There is nothing inherent to a smartphone that makes it an Orwellian surveillance and tracking device any more than there is anything inherent to a desktop computer that makes it an instrument of Microsoft's control over users.
Re: (Score:3)
The moment you have anything that talks to a cellular network, its automatically a tracking device because the network knows exactly where you are (and almost certainly who you are as well)
Re: (Score:3)
Well you don't have to enable the cell modem, but if you do, you could connect it with Phreeli:
[1]https://www.wired.com/story/ne... [wired.com]
[1] https://www.wired.com/story/new-anonymous-phone-carrier-sign-up-with-nothing-but-a-zip-code/
While we are exposing myths (Score:3)
"Large language models" are "artificial intelligence" in much the same way that "Linux" is "on the desktop".
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Linux has many real desktops, both in options and uses. Linux does desktops really well. If Windoze weenies choose to hide in the sand then that's on them.
Whereas LLMs can't do any real intelligence at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends. If "do" is interpreted as per the Carry On films, then possibly it does.
If "do" is interpreted to mean "can actually be deemed even vaguely like", then you're absolutely right.
Magnum PI wants a word (Score:2)
Though you could say it's rather apt.
Untrustworthy (Score:3)
"And they also make mistakes without batting a virtual eyelash. So you can't trust anything that they generate." - woah! That's damning! Thank goodness that doesn't apply to humans!
Seriously, anyone who is down on this technology needs to hand in their nerd/geek card and go and start shouting at clouds. That goes for Slashdot readers too. The handwringing over a technology by middle aged men is, just sad. This tech is transforming, dirty, gritty, and messed up. It's like the Internet used to be. If you can't handle it, then be honest, your world view is outdated and you've become your parents.
Re: (Score:1)
The whole point is that if we want accuracy, we use machines. If I wanted fiction and unreliability, I'll ask humans. If I want to calculate an integral, I don't want an RNG infused answer that might or might not be wrong.
The techology is really cool, it's not AGI, but it has it's place and uses, but with a few issues: 1) it's pay-to-win: the ones with the deepest pockets can make the best product 2) privacy issues - all your data gets siphoned and sold to the highest bidder 3) you unskill yourself by using
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't apply to humans at all though. We choose to lie, LLMs don't have a clue.
Fire bad! (Score:2, Interesting)
Because it can be misused. The world would clearly be a better place without fire. I personally refuse to use any form of fire whatsoever.
Did you know that 100 percent of cancer tumors contain excessively high concentrations of dihydrogen monoxide? Did you know that big pharms adds dihydrogen monoxide to their vaccines? It’s also suspected in playing a major role in most drowning incidents. I’ve decided to cut all dihydrogen monoxide out of my diet and life.
He said, posthumously.
What is intelligence? (Score:2)
I challenge anyone to come up with a definition of intelligence that 1) is clearly satisfied by humans, 2) is clearly not satisfied by current AI, and 3) isn't totally contrived (like defining intelligence as "the ability of humans to...").
Here are some common definitions of intelligence.
"The ability to take in information and make decisions based on it." Computers do that.
"The ability to solve problems." Computers do that.
"The ability to predict the consequences of your actions." Computers do that.
"The
Re: (Score:2)
Computers are programmed to make decisions and predict.
Humans use computers to solve problems.
Re: (Score:2)
When people are speaking "naturally" (which is to say, without scientific or philosophical precision), the word "intelligence" is a vague and sloppy word that rolls in all kinds of mental abilities, including and in particular "conscious experience."
When people say "the LLM doesn't actually understand anything" for the most part they are using the word "understand" to mean "hold the concepts in conscious awareness." For them, intelligence requires consciousness (or just "life") which they expect computers
Re: (Score:2)
I use a definition I've extrapolated from the Turing Test:
In maths, if f(x)=g(x) for all x, then f=g
However, for humans, f(x) isn't a razor-thin line, it's a band that follows a normal distribution, so we have to modify this a little. AIs also don't produce an absolute result but a band that, again, follows a normal distribution. (Nobody demands identical neuron firings between humans for the same stimulus, or even by the same human for the same stimulus.)
If the band for f(x) predominantly lies within 1 std
Re: (Score:2)
It is not about human intelligence, but about different types of technology within the field of "artificial intelligence".
In classic "Artificial Intelligence" before neural networks became mainstream, the term used to stand for when a problem was solved exactly because it was based on carefully crafted rules, put in the system by experts.
Now it means technology that is a black box by design which probably is correct, most of the time, hopefully, knock-on-wood , and based on random posts on the Internet from
Re: (Score:2)
Just a guess, but I'm thinking you're not much of a fan of music by Jerry Lee Lewis or Ted Nugent, either.
He refused to use a GUI for most of his career (Score:2)
I'm not criticizing the guy, he's often right, but he's not exactly forward-minded, that's what I'm trying to say.
Speaking of cars (Score:3)
Directly below this story is one about Congress failing to repeal the kill switch mandate for cars. Maybe the guy is on to something.
Re: (Score:2)
I got myself a converted car for commuting. No fanciness at all. Not even power-steering, LOL.
The battery is a Lithium-Phosphate and fits under the bonnet thankfully. On the down side it only has 60 km range.
Re: (Score:2)
So a golf cart?
Re: (Score:2)
I call it the shopping cart: 1993 Ford Festiva. aka Mazda 121.
Re: (Score:2)
> On the down side it only has 60 km range.
So, 37.28 freedom units? That's only about 7 miles more range than my e-scooter.
...and I can take my scooter on the train.
Re: (Score:2)
>> On the down side it only has 60 km range.
> So, 37.28 freedom units? That's only about 7 miles more range than my e-scooter.
> ...and I can take my scooter on the train.
How much fun is that scooter with 3 bags of groceries and/or in the rain/snow? I had a motorcycle for a while and it sucked in all those cases. Granted, I wasn't allowed to take in on train, but it would have fit. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
> Directly below this story is one about Congress failing to repeal the kill switch mandate for cars. Maybe the guy is on to something.
He's been screaming from the hilltops warning about pretty much every locked-down, consumer-hostile trend the tech industry has been on, even going as far back as when these ideas were just proposals. The thing is, the vast majority of consumers don't see it as a problem and buy the stuff anyway.
It's like McDonald's - everybody knows it's unhealthy and really doesn't even taste all that good, but somehow the business is still incredibly successful.
Re: (Score:2)
It's called the market. People make their own trade-offs and buy accordingly. Most people are not coders nor do they have coder-friends, so giving them the source code of everything they buy is not of much use to them. Which is why they buy Windows laptops or Macs, which are easy to use OOTB, and have companies they can go to if things don't work
I do agree that it is disgraceful, the trends that Apple, Microsoft and Google are going through, doing things like almost bricking old Apple devices, infestin
Re: (Score:2)
> Directly below this story is one about Congress failing to repeal the kill switch mandate for cars. Maybe the guy is on to something.
He is on the Left. Maybe he could pick up the phone and tell all his Democrat friends to repeal the kill switch mandate. It could then be a grand bipartisan move, just like the one to open up the Epstein files
Also, why does he need to find a skilled mechanic to work on a disconnected car? That's how cars used to be, back from a few years ago. I still drive a 2014 model, and it's pretty disconnected. Real issue is that as a communist, he doesn't have the first clue about how companies work, so that ev