News: 0180602310

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Microplastics From Washing Clothes Could Be Hurting Your Tomatoes (washingtonpost.com)

(Friday January 16, 2026 @05:40PM (msmash) from the spin-cycle-of-death dept.)


A new study from Cornell and University of Toronto researchers has found that polyester microfibers shed from synthetic clothing during laundry can [1]interfere with cherry tomato plant development

[2]non-paywalled source

when these particles accumulate in agricultural soil. Plants grown in contaminated soil were 11% less likely to emerge, grew smaller and took several days longer to flower and ripen.

Household laundry is a leading source of this contamination. Treated sewage sludge retains roughly 90% of microfibers from washers, and farmers in some countries apply this material to up to 75% of cropland as fertilizer. Some scientists have questioned the methodology.

Willie Peijnenburg, a professor of environmental toxicology at Leiden University, told WaPo the microfiber concentration used was much higher than field observations. His research suggests plants primarily absorb microplastics through airborne particles entering leaf stomata rather than through soil.



[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2026/01/14/microplastics-tomatoes-laundry/

[2] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/microplastics-from-washing-clothes-could-be-hurting-your-tomatoes/ar-AA1UdFwN



The fear machine has been in overdrive (Score:1)

by Oh really now ( 5490472 )

Microplastics: Still wildly immature research and as yet unproven, but that won't stop them from trying to unlock a new marketable fear.

Re: The fear machine has been in overdrive (Score:3)

by liqu1d ( 4349325 )

Regardless of whether the effect is over or understated you can't be suggesting that introducing more plastic to the environment isn't an issue...

Re: (Score:2)

by 0123456 ( 636235 )

Why should we assume it is an issue?

Certainly I doubt it's anywhere remotely as bad for plants as modern industrial agriculture.

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

> Certainly I doubt it's anywhere remotely as bad for plants as modern industrial agriculture.

Modern industrial agriculture feeds the world. You're not going to be able to sustain the likely peak population on traditional farming alone. Of course there is always room to improve and reduce the harm and increase the health. Which is why we also cannot allow profits alone to decide everything in the industry.

We're aware of the problems of monocrops, but that practice is slowly on the decline. And there is more consumer awareness of the ethics in the practice of concentrated animal feeding operations (C

Re: The fear machine has been in overdrive (Score:3)

by Tomahawk ( 1343 )

"X could very well be causing you cancer! We suggest you stop using it!"

"Stop fear-mongering -- it's as yet unproven!"

---

Certainly having micro-plastics in every organ in our bodies is doing no good for us. It's very likely causing us harm. It's still being researched, yes, but I'm certainly not happy that they are there in the first place.

It would be nice to not add more

natural fibers (Score:2)

by awwshit ( 6214476 )

I prefer natural fibers. Synthetic fibers are not good for the planet.

[1]https://textileexchange.org/kn... [textileexchange.org]

"Polyester continues to be the most widely produced fiber, making up 59% of total global fiber output of which 88 % is fossil-based. In terms of volume, polyester fiber production increased from around 71 million tonnes in 2023 to around 78 million tonnes in 2024. "

"Although [cotton] remains the second most widely produced fiber after polyester, global [cotton] production fell slightly by 1% to 19%. In ter

[1] https://textileexchange.org/knowledge-center/reports/materials-market-report-2025/

Wow, it never even occurred to me.. (Score:2)

by h33t l4x0r ( 4107715 )

That I can add treated sewage sludge to my garden. What was I even thinking!?

Re: (Score:2)

by ItsJustAPseudonym ( 1259172 )

"Poopmatoes", anyone?

Wear only cotton clothing. (Score:3)

by Futurepower(R) ( 558542 )

Wear only cotton clothing. Cotton is not poisonous.

Sadly everything has consequences (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

The environment might be better off if you switched to wearing polyester given the level of environmental contamination that a pesticide-intensive crop like cotton causes.

Contradictions? (Score:2)

by Berkyjay ( 1225604 )

Didn't I just see some studies go out saying a lot of the old microplastic studies were sus?

For men use, if they have an evil turn, to write it in marble:
and whoso doth us a good turn we write it in dust.
-- Sir Thomas More