Bell Labs 'Unix' Tape from 1974 Successfully Dumped to a Tarball (discuss.systems)
- Reference: 0180431873
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/12/21/020235/bell-labs-unix-tape-from-1974-successfully-dumped-to-a-tarball
- Source link: https://discuss.systems/@ricci/115747843169814700
Research professor Rob Ricci at the University of Utah's school of computing [5]posted pictures and video of the tape-reading process, along with several updates. ("So far some of our folks think they have found Hunt The Wumpus and the C code for a Snobol interpreter.") University researcher Mike Hibler noted the code predates the famous comment "You are not expected to understand this" ā and found part of the C compiler with a copyright of 1972.
The version of Unix recovered seems to have some (but not all) of the commands that later appeared in Unix v5, according to [6]discussion on social media. "UNIX wasn't versioned as we know it today," [7]explains University of Utah PhD student Thalia Archibald, who researched [8]early Unix history (including the tape) and also worked on its upload. "In the early days, when you wanted to cut a tape, you'd ask Ken if it was a good day ā whether the system was relatively bug-free ā and copy off the research machine... I've been saying It's probably V5 minus a tiny bit, which turned out to be quite true."
[1] https://archive.org/details/utah_unix_v4_raw
[2] https://oldbytes.space/@bitsavers/115505135441862982
[3] https://github.com/LenShustek/readtape
[4] http://squoze.net/UNIX/v4/README
[5] https://discuss.systems/@ricci/115747843169814700
[6] https://oldbytes.space/@bitsavers/115750112366932905
[7] https://oldbytes.space/@bitsavers/115750157050988925
[8] https://github.com/thaliaarchi/unix-history
I worked with magnetic tape a bit in the late 80s (Score:2)
I'd be really, REALLY surprised if this image isn't chock full o' flipped bits and other random garbage.
Still - this is really cool though!
Re: (Score:2)
Some brands of tape fare better than others over the years. I've had 7 track tapes from the late 60s still be readable.
Re: (Score:2)
There were two "bad blocks," and both have been recovered.
read once? (Score:2)
i am curious of the condition of the tape. was this a situation where we got one shot to read the tape? did it self-destruct as it ran past the read head?
Re: (Score:2)
there's a video in the summary, you could try to guess the condition from it: [1]https://discuss.systems/@ricci... [discuss.systems]
Let's say I've seen worse.
[1] https://discuss.systems/@ricci/115747969488009267
Imagine (Score:2)
Since we're stepping back in time, Iām going there. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of tape readers! Ignoring if a cluster of tape readers even makes sense.
Hell yeah (Score:2)
Fire up simh (or your real PDP-11) and step back in time.
Re: (Score:2)
Somebody notify Dave Plummer!