News: 0180431873

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Bell Labs 'Unix' Tape from 1974 Successfully Dumped to a Tarball (discuss.systems)

(Saturday December 20, 2025 @09:02PM (EditorDavid) from the old-OS dept.)


Archive.org now has a page with "the raw analog waveform and the [1]reconstructed digital tape image (analog.tap), read at the Computer History Museum's Shustek Research Archives on 19 December 2025 [2]by Al Kossow using a modified tape reader and analyzed with Len Shustek's [3]readtape tool." A Berlin-based retrocomputing enthusiast has created [4]a page with the contents of the tape ready for bootstrapping , "including a tar file of the filesystem," and instructions on dumping an RK05 disk image from tape to disk (and what to do next).

Research professor Rob Ricci at the University of Utah's school of computing [5]posted pictures and video of the tape-reading process, along with several updates. ("So far some of our folks think they have found Hunt The Wumpus and the C code for a Snobol interpreter.") University researcher Mike Hibler noted the code predates the famous comment "You are not expected to understand this" — and found part of the C compiler with a copyright of 1972.

The version of Unix recovered seems to have some (but not all) of the commands that later appeared in Unix v5, according to [6]discussion on social media. "UNIX wasn't versioned as we know it today," [7]explains University of Utah PhD student Thalia Archibald, who researched [8]early Unix history (including the tape) and also worked on its upload. "In the early days, when you wanted to cut a tape, you'd ask Ken if it was a good day — whether the system was relatively bug-free — and copy off the research machine... I've been saying It's probably V5 minus a tiny bit, which turned out to be quite true."



[1] https://archive.org/details/utah_unix_v4_raw

[2] https://oldbytes.space/@bitsavers/115505135441862982

[3] https://github.com/LenShustek/readtape

[4] http://squoze.net/UNIX/v4/README

[5] https://discuss.systems/@ricci/115747843169814700

[6] https://oldbytes.space/@bitsavers/115750112366932905

[7] https://oldbytes.space/@bitsavers/115750157050988925

[8] https://github.com/thaliaarchi/unix-history



Hell yeah (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Fire up simh (or your real PDP-11) and step back in time.

Re: (Score:2)

by usedtobestine ( 7476084 )

Somebody notify Dave Plummer!

I worked with magnetic tape a bit in the late 80s (Score:2)

by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 )

I'd be really, REALLY surprised if this image isn't chock full o' flipped bits and other random garbage.

Still - this is really cool though!

Re: (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Some brands of tape fare better than others over the years. I've had 7 track tapes from the late 60s still be readable.

Re: (Score:2)

by Tailhook ( 98486 )

There were two "bad blocks," and both have been recovered.

read once? (Score:2)

by zeiche ( 81782 )

i am curious of the condition of the tape. was this a situation where we got one shot to read the tape? did it self-destruct as it ran past the read head?

Re: (Score:2)

by Mr. Dollar Ton ( 5495648 )

there's a video in the summary, you could try to guess the condition from it: [1]https://discuss.systems/@ricci... [discuss.systems]

Let's say I've seen worse.

[1] https://discuss.systems/@ricci/115747969488009267

Imagine (Score:2)

by molarmass192 ( 608071 )

Since we're stepping back in time, I’m going there. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of tape readers! Ignoring if a cluster of tape readers even makes sense.

It should be a case of "Just plug in a new kernel, and suddenly your
existing filesystem just allows you to do more! 20% more for the same
price! AND we'll throw in this useful ginzu knife for just 4.95 for
shipping and handling. Absolutely free!"

- Linus Torvalds on linux-kernel