News: 0180418209

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

YouTube Shuts Down Channels Using AI To Create Fake Movie Trailers (deadline.com)

(Thursday December 18, 2025 @05:40PM (BeauHD) from the no-longer-available dept.)


An anonymous reader quotes a report from Deadline:

> YouTube has terminated two prominent channels that [1]used artificial intelligence to create fake movie trailers , Deadline can reveal. The Google-owned video giant has switched off Screen Culture and KH Studio, which together boasted well over 2 million subscribers and more than a billion views. The channels have been replaced with the message: "This page isn't available. Sorry about that. Try searching for something else."

>

> Earlier this year, YouTube suspended ads on Screen Culture and KH Studio following a [2]Deadline investigation into fake movie trailers plaguing the platform since the rise of generative AI. The channels later returned to monetization when they started adding "fan trailer," "parody" and "concept trailer" to their video titles. But those caveats disappeared In recent months, prompting concern in the fan-made trailer community. YouTube's position is that the channels' decision to revert to their previous behavior violated its spam and misleading-metadata policies. This resulted in their termination. "The monster was defeated," one YouTuber told Deadline following the enforcement action.

>

> Deadline's investigation revealed that Screen Culture spliced together official footage with AI images to create franchise trailers that duped many YouTube viewers. Screen Culture founder Nikhil P. Chaudhari said his team of a dozen editors exploited YouTube's algorithm by being early with fake trailers and constantly iterating with videos. [...] Our deep dive into fake trailers revealed that instead of protecting copyright on these videos, a handful of Hollywood studios, including Warner Bros Discovery and Sony, secretly asked YouTube to ensure that the ad revenue from the AI-heavy videos flowed in their direction.



[1] https://deadline.com/2025/12/youtube-terminates-screen-culture-kh-studio-fake-ai-trailer-1236652506/

[2] https://deadline.com/2025/03/youtube-ad-revenue-fake-movie-trailer-screen-culture-1236354143/



Youtube is now an AI cesspool (Score:4, Informative)

by BrendaEM ( 871664 )

Apparently, youtube doesn't mind all the AI, just any that they might have to fend off an MPA legal attack. Meanwhile, it's beginning to be difficult to wade through the AI slop.

Re: Youtube is now an AI cesspool (Score:3)

by liqu1d ( 4349325 )

It's painful isn't it. I instinctively click back as soon as it becomes apparent it's an AI video. I'm sure there's some quality AI stuff out there but I'm not willing to sort through the shite. There was enough rubbish on YouTube long before it was automatically produced.

Re: (Score:2)

by smooth wombat ( 796938 )

It's not just videos. Trying to listen to music has been thrown into the same cesspool. I was listening to a song last night and about a third of the way in the music stopped. I saw there were an additional 6 - 8 scripts which needed run to have the music play, even after I already enabled 6- 8.

I closed out of the song and did something else.

If you have to enable over a dozen scripts to play a 4 minute song, you suck.

Youtube is ridiculous (Score:2)

by Slashythenkilly ( 7027842 )

I dont understand the logic in banning when all you have to do is label it so anyone watching will know.

Re: (Score:2)

by Z00L00K ( 682162 )

I agree, as long as it's labeled or satire and clearly not trying to be "real" then I don't have any problems with it and it could be pretty amusing.

Re: (Score:2)

by sinij ( 911942 )

These are extremely annoying when you don't want AI slop in your recommendations and just looking for movie trailers or reviews. Hope they target fake AI car reviews in the same way.

Re: (Score:2)

by PsychoSlashDot ( 207849 )

> You are so fucking old the only "slop" around is in your adult diaper old man. Get with the times!

1} You are incorrect; the person you are replying to is neither fucking, nor old.

2} You are incorrect; slop has an accepted applicable definition - needing no quotation marks - to the point that it is "word of the year".

3} You are incorrect; there is AI slop around.

4} You are incorrect; the person you are replying to is neither wearing a diaper - adult or otherwise, nor a man.

But most importantly...

5} You are incorrect; getting with the times is not an admirable goal when the times are bad. Which the

Re: Youtube is ridiculous (Score:2)

by dj245 ( 732906 )

I worry this will result in a "This product may cause cancer in California" sort of outcome. Label it as AI just in case. I've already seen the AI tag on a few videos which were arguably edited only using conventional methods. One of them had only been sped up.

It was deliberately deceptive practices (Score:2)

by Bahumat ( 213955 )

The issue became that those automatic labels aren't always communicated to other services -- so you'd end up with, for example and most aggravatingly, your newsreel on your mobile device passing you a link for a new trailer and discover only after clicking it that it wasn't the official trailer but an AI fake.

I had already had to ask my phone to stop showing me content from Screen Culture because of this problem. It is deliberately deceptive practices that Screen Culture was engaging in.

Re: (Score:2)

by PsychoSlashDot ( 207849 )

> I don't understand the logic in banning when all you have to do is label it so anyone watching will know.

"All you have to do". The moment that phrase comes up, you've given yourself a clue what to investigate.

YouTube doesn't know the content is AI-generated except because these two (2) channels were known for uploading deliberately misleading content. To do what you suggest, they would have to produce and implement AI-detection code, plus pay to run it against every upload. Further, they'd have to analyze the description the uploader picks, to determine if it is misleading or not. They'd have to deal wit

Kurzgesagt (Score:2)

by TwistedGreen ( 80055 )

This is why I only watch Kurzgesagt

Some AI-Generated Trailers Are Interesting (Score:2)

by organgtool ( 966989 )

I'm not sure if either of these channels were involved, but I saw some interesting AI-generated trailers of fairly modern popular movies and TV shows portrayed in the style of the 1950s. I found it to be full of interesting anachronisms and I especially enjoyed the way it portrayed female aesthetics and seductive behavior (and judging by the comments, so did many others).

Celebrate Public Domain Day (Score:1)

by davidwr ( 791652 )

Create AI-generated "fake" movie trailers for [1]movies entering the public domain this January 1 [duke.edu]. Just be sure the AI is only trained on public-domain materials.

Here's some [2]previous /. coverage of Public Domain Day [slashdot.org].

[1] https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2026/

[2] https://slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=%22Public+domain+day%22

Good. Screen Culture was a plague. (Score:2)

by DesScorp ( 410532 )

Screen Culture in particular was spamming YT with fake trailers years before AI really blew up, and labeled them very, very deceptively ("Official Trailer Release", and such). YouTube should have banned them years ago, and the studios should have sued. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Fucking finally (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

I've been reporting this shit as spam for like 4 years now.

It's more than magnificent -- it's mediocre.
-- Sam Goldwyn