Mass Hacking of IP Cameras Leave Koreans Feeling Vulnerable in Homes, Businesses (joins.com)
- Reference: 0180418169
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/12/18/1933212/mass-hacking-of-ip-cameras-leave-koreans-feeling-vulnerable-in-homes-businesses
- Source link: https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-12-17/national/socialAffairs/Mass-hacking-of-IP-cameras-leave-Koreans-feeling-vulnerable-in-homes-businesses/2478843
Police believe one suspect alone hacked 63,000 cameras and produced 545 videos that netted him 35 million won ($24,000) in cryptocurrency; a second suspect, operating independently, compromised 70,000 devices and earned 18 million won from 648 videos. The footage accounted for 62% of all content on the website, which maintains a dedicated "Korean" category. A government survey found that only 59% of installation companies consistently carried out mandatory security measures such as changing default passwords. Lawmakers are now pursuing legislation requiring security-certified IP cameras in sensitive facilities.
[1] https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-12-17/national/socialAffairs/Mass-hacking-of-IP-cameras-leave-Koreans-feeling-vulnerable-in-homes-businesses/2478843
As usual (Score:3)
As usual, 545 videos for 24 000 $ is a lot of victims for little profits. Crime annoys a lot of people for very petty results. The people doing that deserve to be called lowlifes on many levels.
Why put the cameras there? (Score:2)
This is on par with buying gift cards and reading the numbers over the phone to 'pay your unexpected tax bill'.
If you buy a camera and put it on line and do not have a full time security guy to maintain it, I assure you it will be hacked.
NKor disappointed (Score:2)
It'll be harder for them to compromise SKor. But seriously, given the hacker haven that North Korea is, you'd think South Korea would be a lot more careful with computer security regulation.
Sure, makes sense (Score:3)
Hey, we're going to have a room set up just for breastfeeding.
Should I put in a webcam connected to the internet?
Of course!
Action is good but this one? (Score:2)
Their action is requiring security-certified IP cameras in sensitive facilities.
What is wrong expecting this for all camera's (and devices)?
It won't matter... (Score:2)
...if the cameras are "security-certified" if either (a) the box they feed isn't, or (b) they're installed by idiots.
Re: (Score:2)
If the cameras need a cloud service to work then you are doing it wrong. Way too many devices uses cloud services these days.
Also turn off UPnP in your router since that can open up backdoors to no end.