News: 0180399787

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Meta Tolerates Rampant Ad Fraud From China To Safeguard Billions In Revenue (reuters.com)

(Tuesday December 16, 2025 @10:30PM (BeauHD) from the behind-the-scenes dept.)


A Reuters investigation found that Meta [1]knowingly tolerated large volumes of scam and illegal ads from China worth billions in revenue. Reuters reports:

> Though China's authoritarian government bans use of Meta social media by its citizens, Beijing lets Chinese companies advertise to foreign consumers on the globe-spanning platforms. As a result, Meta's advertising business was thriving in China, ultimately reaching over $18 billion in annual sales in 2024, more than a tenth of the company's global revenue. But Meta calculated that about 19% of that money -- more than $3 billion -- was coming from ads for scams, illegal gambling, pornography and other banned content, according to internal Meta documents reviewed by Reuters.

>

> The documents are part of a cache of previously unreported material generated over the past four years by teams including Meta's finance, lobbying, engineering and safety divisions. The cache reveals Meta's efforts over that period to understand the scale of abuse on its platforms and the company's reluctance to introduce fixes that could undermine its business and revenues. The documents show that Meta believed China was the country of origin of roughly a quarter of all ads for scams and banned products on Meta's platforms worldwide. Victims ranged from shoppers in Taiwan who purchased bogus health supplements to investors in the United States and Canada who were swindled out of their savings. "We need to make significant investment to reduce growing harm," Meta staffers warned in an internal April 2024 presentation to leaders of its safety operations.

>

> To that end, Meta created an anti-fraud team that went beyond previous efforts to monitor scams and other banned activity from China. Using a variety of stepped-up enforcement tools, it slashed the problematic ads by about half during the second half of 2024 -- from 19% to 9% of the total advertising revenue coming from China. Then Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg weighed in. "As a result of Integrity Strategy pivot and follow-up from Zuck," a late 2024 document notes, the China ads-enforcement team was "asked to pause" its work. Reuters was unable to learn the specifics of the CEO's involvement or what the so-called "Integrity Strategy pivot" entailed. But after Zuckerberg's input, the documents show, Meta disbanded its China-focused anti-scam team. It also lifted a freeze it had introduced on granting new Chinese ad agencies access to its platforms. One document shows that Meta shelved yet other anti-scam measures that internal tests had indicated would be effective. The document didn't detail the specifics of those measures.

>

> Meta took these steps even as an outside consultant it hired produced research that warned "Meta's own behavior and policies" were fostering systemic corruption in the Chinese market for ads targeting users in other countries, additional documents show. The upshot: Within a few months of Meta's brief crackdown, a new crop of Chinese advertising agencies was flooding Facebook and Instagram with prohibited ads. By mid-2025, banned ads climbed back to about 16% of Meta's China revenue. Rob Leathern, who was a senior director of product management at Facebook until 2020 and is no longer at the company, said the scale of predatory advertising revealed in the documents represents a major breakdown in consumer protections at the social media giant. "The levels that you're talking about are not defensible," he said of the percentage of abusive ads. "I don't know how anyone could think this is okay."



[1] https://www.reuters.com/investigations/meta-tolerates-rampant-ad-fraud-china-safeguard-billions-revenue-2025-12-15/



Late 2024, huh? (Score:1)

by procrastinatos ( 1004262 )

> "As a result of Integrity Strategy pivot and follow-up from Zuck," a late 2024 document notes, the China ads-enforcement team was "asked to pause" its work.

I wonder [1]what else [theguardian.com] happened in late 2024...

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/12/meta-donates-1m-to-donald-trumps-inaugural-fund

Meta reflects Zuckerberg (Score:5, Insightful)

by abulafia ( 7826 )

And vice-versa.

He has complete control of the company. If he doesn't know what is going on somewhere in the company, it is because he isn't paying attention or doesn't want to know.

And this has been his only job. His entire adult life has been dedicated to manipulating people through a screen to make line go up.

Why would he care about people getting scammed when the line can go up?

Re: (Score:3)

by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 )

Bingo, think about their incentives; the government isn't going to care as of late 2024, they are probably not seeing customers leave at an amount to be concerned about, not anywhere near enough to counter the money. The markets don't care and then the shareholders obviously love it, maybe these employees feel a tinge of concern but you know then they look at their portfolio.

So what's the incentive for Meta to stop this? It's overall probably bad for society and the economy and consumers and even national

Meta Reflects America (Score:2)

by sound+vision ( 884283 )

It's easy for foreign intelligence services to find an American willing to sell out their country for the right price, in this case 1.9% of revenue.

This is small though, compared to some of the scams the Chinese, Saudis, and more pull, aided by America's own government. It's like a circle jerk of guys fucking over their own countries and sending money back and forth between each other. A few of them need to go to break the cycle.

Re: (Score:2)

by Z00L00K ( 682162 )

Only if the fine for each scam ad would be a billion he'd care.

Re: (Score:2)

by HiThere ( 15173 )

I don't believe it's been proven that Trump is personally a pedophile. Merely that he is friends with a few.

Re: (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

It hasn't been proven in court, but there's been more solid evidence presented than there was against Cosby. Who, BTW, totally also did all that shit, inb4 some bullshit

So while it hasn't been proven in a court (Score:1)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

You can check the Wikipedia article on Trump's sexual assault claims and eight of them involve children.

That's in addition to 20 that at least involved adult women.

Now the first time a woman accuses a man of raping her when she was a child that's bad but he's famous and maybe... The second time you have to start to wonder but again maybe... By the third time we've got a pattern and by the 5th I don't think any reasonable person would not be believing the women. By the 8th he's practically a Catholi

Obligatory (Score:1)

by Anonymous Coward

Fuck the Zuck!

OH! (Score:2)

by Travco ( 1872216 )

Yet another reason to not use any of their products

Facebook has ads? Huh. (Score:3)

by spywhere ( 824072 )

I avoid both Facebook ads and their algorithm by going to this link:

[1]https://www.facebook.com/?filt... [facebook.com]

This displays only friends and accounts I follow, in reverse chronological order.

To completely avoid ads, I report every "sponsored" link as sexually inappropriate... triggering a human review each time

After I do this about half a dozen times, FB stops inserting ads in my reverse chron feed for several months.

When I see another "Sponsored" item, I just start reporting them again..

[1] https://www.facebook.com/?filter=all&sk=h_chr

Re: (Score:1)

by Goat of Death ( 633284 )

Got to say, if I used Facebook at all I really love this hack.

The scary thing about them (Score:1)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

Is Facebook makes 180 billion dollars every year. And most of that is pure profit since they just don't need that many employees relative to that revenue.

That is way too much money for one single person to command.

It's not about some nebulous income inequality bullshit that you hear the left wing go on about at that point you're just being ordered around because somebody with that much money gets to decide what you do and how you live your life whether you like to admit it or not

Watched someone infect their computer on Facebook (Score:3)

by GotNoRice ( 7207988 )

After cleaning up a friend's computer, I watched them get back on it. The first thing they did was go to Facebook. There was an advertisement that was clearly disguised to look like a Facebook notification claiming that they had a new friend request. Without hesitation they clicked on it, and thus began the process of re-infecting their system. It turned out to be very instructional, at least. I explained to them how being asked to copy and paste commands into an Administrator command prompt isn't a normal part of inviting a new friend on Facebook. Crisis averted. But it was kind of mind-blowing to see that Meta allowed those ads on their platform in the first place. I realized that even I had become a bit sheltered due to using uBlock Origin on Firefox for years, given how good of a job it does.

Seems they encourage this kind of behavior (Score:2)

by mrclevesque ( 1413593 )

From last week's article, usually Meta doesn't ban an ad reported or automatically flag as fraudulent, instead they raise their fee:

"But the company only bans advertisers if its automated systems predict the marketers are at least 95% certain to be committing fraud, the documents show. If the company is less certain – but still believes the advertiser is a likely scammer – Meta charges higher ad rates as a penalty, according to the documents"

This is big business for Meta:

"Meta internally project

Repeal Section 230 (Score:4, Informative)

by speedplane ( 552872 )

Section 230 of the communications decency act gives online service providers the freedom to publish anything they want. Repeal it, and this problem goes away.

It's pretty hard to tell what does bring happiness; poverty and wealth
have both failed.
-- Kim Hubbard