How a 23-Year-Old in 1975 Built the World's First Handheld Digital Camera (bbc.com)
- Reference: 0180375553
- News link: https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/25/12/13/0652226/how-a-23-year-old-in-1975-built-the-worlds-first-handheld-digital-camera
- Source link: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251205-how-the-handheld-digital-camera-was-born
> "You take your picture, you have to wait a long time, you have to fiddle with these chemicals. Well, you know, I was raised on Star Trek, and all the good ideas come from Star Trek. So I said what if we could just do it all electronically...?"
>
> Researchers at Bell Labs in the US had, in 1969, created a type of integrated circuit called a [2]charge-coupled device (CCD). An electric charge could be stored on a metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS), and could be passed from one MOS to another. Its creators believed one of its applications might one day be used as part of an imaging device — though they hadn't worked out how that might happen. The CCD, nevertheless, was quickly developed. By 1974, the US microchip company Fairchild Semiconductors had built the first commercial CCD, measuring just 100 x 100 pixels — the tiny electronic samples taken of an original image. The new device's ability to capture an image was only theoretical — no-one had, as yet, tried to take an image and display it. (NASA, it turned out, [3]was also looking at this technology , but not for consumer cameras....)
>
> The CCD circuit responded to light but could only form an image if Sasson was somehow able to attach a lens to it. He could then convert the light into digital information — a blizzard of 1s and 0s — but there was just one problem: money. "I had no money to build this thing. Nobody told me to build it, and I certainly couldn't demand any money for it," he says. "I basically stole all the parts, I was in Kodak and the apparatus division, which had a lot of parts. I stole the optical assembly from an XL movie camera downstairs in a used parts bin. I was just walking by, you see it, and you take it, you know." He was also able to source an analogue to digital converter from a $12 (about £5 in 1974) digital voltmeter, rather than spending hundreds on the part. I could manage to get all these parts without anybody really noticing," he says....
>
> The bulky device needed a way to store the information the CCD was capturing, so Sasson used an audio cassette deck. But he also needed a way to view the image once it was saved on the magnetic tape. "We had to build a playback unit," Sasson says. "And, again, nobody asked me to do that either. So all I got to do is the reverse of what I did with the camera, and then I have to turn that digital pattern into an NTSC television signal." NTSC (National Television System Committee) was the conversion standard used by American TV sets. Sasson had to turn only 100 lines of digital code captured by the camera into the 400 lines that would form a television signal.
The solution was a Motorola microprocessor, and by December 1975, the camera and its playback unit was complete, the article points out. With his colleague Jim Schueckler, Sasson had spent more than a year putting together the "increasingly bulky" device, that "looked like an oversized toaster."
> The camera had a shutter that would take an image at about 1/20th of a second, and — if everything worked as it should — the cassette tape would start to move as the camera transferred the stored information from its CCD [which took 23 seconds]. "It took about 23 seconds to play it back, and then about eight seconds to reconfigure it to make it look like a television signal, and send it to the TV set that I stole from another lab...." In 1978, Kodak was granted the first patent for a digital camera. It was Sasson's first invention. The patent is thought to have earned Eastman Kodak billions in licensing and infringement payments by the time [4]they sold the rights to it , fearing bankruptcy, in 2012...
>
> As for Sasson, he never worked on anything other than the digital technology he had helped to create until he retired from Eastman Kodak in 2009.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader [5]sinij for sharing the article.
[1] https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251205-how-the-handheld-digital-camera-was-born
[2] https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2307
[3] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750020764
[4] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20787024
[5] https://slashdot.org/~sinij
So, like Seiko, Kodak devised their own demise (Score:5, Interesting)
So, like Seiko, Kodak devised their own demise. But, unlike Kodak, Seiko found way to make both the old and the new, and they still do. They didn't just survive, they excelled and grew.
Seiko made the first wearable quartz analog watch in 1969. The year I was born. By 1992 the quartz analog watch had pretty much destroyed the mechanical watch industry, Seiko included.
Yet miraculously Seiko still makes their own quartz and mechanicals, and the top end of theirs is sublime. They've even invented a third kind of movement, a hybrid. Driven by a spring, it has a gear train but not an escapement like you know. It has a wheel that is at once generator and brake, and drives a quartz system that regulates the speed by braking the wheel with electromagnets. The Euros wish they had something as slick as the Spring Drive.
But Kodak.. wtf, Kodak. You let digital -- your own invention -- put you out of business. You barely hang on because of the hobby and what's left of the motion picture industry, the die-hard students and directors who still insist on doing it on film.
Not just Kodak. it's a major miracle we still have Nikon, Canon, Leica, Hasselblad. Look at what was lost. Rollei. ROLLEI! Dammit, their 6x6 was superb, only toppable by Mamiya, really.. and they're both gone.
A price of progress, I suppose. Digital photography destroyed the photography industry as we knew it. How many names went out of business on both the manufacture and sales and development / lab work? How many out of jobs?
Re: (Score:2)
Seiko Spring drive is amazing.
Re: (Score:2)
Seiko Spring drive is amazing, but Europeans do have something to rival it in my opinion .. the Gyrotourbillon. In terms of accuracy and utility it's more of a gimmick than Spring Drive, but looks cool. I haven't seen anyone duplicate it either.
Classic example of "the innovator's dilemma" (Score:2)
You have a wonderfully profitable business making widgets. You see an opportunity to invest in something which is presently a poor substitute that your customers would never pay for. And if developed further, that new thing would have thinner profit margins, and would erode the profits of that wonderfully profitable business. Do you...
a) continue to focus on your wonderfully profitable business, and hope that nothing comes of that potential alternative?
b) invest in that potential alternative, knowing that i
Re: (Score:2)
It has to do with established vested interests in the company. If you're the powerful VP in charge of film operations, are you going to let those kids working of digital come in and take a fat slice of your pie? Same reason why GM and Ford can't pivot to EV and autonomous driving. Something even Rivian is able to do better. Within many companies, people make decisions based on what's good for themselves, not the company. That's why companies find it very hard to pivot, especially if the CEO doesn't have a s
Re: (Score:2)
Xerox is another good example, the people running the thing had vested interests in photocopiers and thought all the stuff Xerox PARC was doing was at best a distraction from the photocopier business or at worst a threat to it.
Re: (Score:2)
Kodak's demise is a little overstated just because they have been reorganized several times; and 'Kodak' is sort of the dump entity. There are still a variety of applications for being competent at thin film chemistry, including semiconductor fabrication, just not so much making 35mm film. So Eastman Chemical got most of that. And some of their medical and otherwise higher-end optics and imaging stuff also got spun off, with the business of not terribly optically interesting cameras under heavy threat from
Sold the 1975 patent in 2012? (Score:2)
Is that correct? Somebody paid (I'm guessing millions) for an expired patent? Or maybe it wasn't expired, I recall companies used to be able to "submarine" patents pretty well back then.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not. Kodak sold a pile of 1000 odd patents to a consortium of tech companies for something like half a billion dollars. It was the accumulated bullshit of thirty years of "transferring a digital image via digital computer network on a Tuesday" type stuff, plus some actual innovation, much of it in algorithms, mixed in.
He should also have patented... (Score:3)
... the idea of putting that contraption into a phone. :)
Re: (Score:2)
> ... the idea of putting that contraption into a phone. :)
It could've been done... [1]with one of these babies [wikipedia.org].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_telephone#/media/File:Tel-312AH-latrun-exhibition-1.jpg
The Kodak DC-16 (Score:2)
The first digital camera I was exposed to was the companies Kodak DC-16, it was in the mid to late 1990's
And I loved the pictures!
It was only in 1999 I could afford the first under 1000 guilders digital camera, an Olympus C-900.
Re: (Score:2)
Oops, it was a DC-10.
film to digital (Score:1)
started with an old brownie camera in the early 70's. Went to SLR in the early 80's. First digital in 2006 (still have it! Panasonic FZ-50) Upgraded to d-slr in 08, and another d-slr in 12 and still use it. Multiple lenses, flashes, filters but it is still the best camera out there. Hey, nothing against smartphones, but those super TINY image sensors not to mention there are too many of them.
Cool (Score:2)
I had no idea how hacky/secretive the creation of it was. Wonder how much he got paid for their billions of profit.
Re:Cool (Score:4, Insightful)
Probably the same amount the guy who invented PCR got .. a $1000 bonus check and an "exceeds expectations" in that year's performance review.
Re: (Score:2)
[1]Middle management and above [imdb.com]:
"Hey, Mista Nugget, you the bomb. We sellin' chicken faster than you can tear the bone out. So I'm gonna write my clowny-ass name on this fat-ass check for you".
The last three corporate hackers in a mop closet somewhere:
"Still had the idea, though."
[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0749448/quotes/
Re: (Score:2)
> their billions of profit.
Kodak??
Re: (Score:2)
Hacky: the first of pretty much any gadget is going to be a pile of junk on some engineer's desk. So long as it fits on a desk.
Why secretive? He took an image sensor invented at Bell Labs and manufactured by Fairchild and used it to make an image. Secretive from his bosses maybe, since he managed to put Kodak out of business.