OpenAI, alongside Anthropic and Block, have [1]launched the [2]Agentic AI Foundation under the Linux Foundation, describing it as a [3]neutral home for standards as agentic systems move into real production . It may sound well-meaning, but Slashdot reader and NERDS.xyz founder [4]BrianFagioli isn't buying the narrative. In a report for NERDS.xyz, Fagioli writes:

> Instead of opening models, training data, or anything that would meaningfully shift power toward the community, the companies involved are donating lightweight artifacts like [5]AGENTS.md , MCP, and goose. They're useful, but they're also the safest, least threatening pieces of their ecosystem to "open." From where I sit, it looks like a strategic attempt to lock in influence over emerging standards before truly open projects get a chance to define the space. I see the entire move as smoke and mirrors.

>

> With regulators paying closer attention and developer trust slipping, creating a Linux Foundation directed fund gives these companies convenient cover to say they're being transparent and collaborative. But nothing about this structure forces them to share anything substantial, and nothing about it changes the closed nature of their core technology. To me, it looks like Big Tech trying to set the rules of the game early, using the language of openness without actually embracing it. Slashdot readers have seen this pattern before, and this one feels no different.



[1] https://openai.com/index/agentic-ai-foundation/

[2] https://aaif.io/

[3] https://nerds.xyz/2025/12/openai-agentic-ai-pandering-fears/

[4] https://slashdot.org/~BrianFagioli

[5] http://agents.md/