"Let's see one of you rich, pasty white motherfuckers try to sneak into Mexico or Russia with no papers"

Spoken like someone who has never left his hometown. You really think you can't get into Mexico without a passport? No sneaking necessary. You just walk across in plain view.

>> If you think Hollywood is suddenly "woke" then you haven't been paying attention to movies for a good 70 years.

> No, you dumbass, the whole idea here is that with Ellison taking over Skydance / Paramount, the idea is that there is some balance being injected into the business.

> After all, as you point out, Hollywood has been a woke dumpster fire since the beginning.

> There needs to be a balance. For every Leftist billionaire funding sedition and division, there must be a Rightist billionaire pushing unity and deporting the abject filth being imported into this country since the mid 60's but hugely accellerated under Biden's teunure of 2020-2024.

> Deport them all.

> Let's see one of you rich, pasty white motherfuckers try to sneak into Mexico or Russia with no papers. Let's see how well those two countries treat you.

> Don't like it? Get the fuck out. Leave. Go live where you're happy, wherever that may be.. but not here.

Right, let's cut through the noise. There is a significant political dimension to this story that's been buried under a mountain of speculation. The Trump administration is openly favoring David Ellison's bid for WBD, with officials stating that the owner of WBD is highly important to the administration. This political interest is underscored by a recent, controversial event. Paramount paid Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit over a Kamala Harris interview, and their merger was approved shortly afterward. Now, three senators are investigating whether Ellison cut a side deal with Trump, raising legitimate corruption concerns. Ellison's own political history paints a picture of strategic opportunism. He is a self-described social liberal who gave nearly a million dollars to Biden's campaign. Yet, he began appearing at UFC fights with Trump precisely when he needed regulatory approval. Furthermore, under his leadership, CBS dissolved its race and culture unit, laid off women disproportionately, and fired the Gaza correspondent. This isn't ideological balance; it's strategic positioning for business advantage. The real story here is that the Trump administration appears to be using antitrust power to reward friendly billionaires and penalize others. As the Writers Guild noted, we are handing the keys to the media kingdom to entities primarily motivated by maximizing short-term returns. This is a genuine scandal about the antitrust process being compromised by political favouritism and billionaires acquiring media influence through political connections. David Ellison isn't correcting decades of Hollywood ideology. He is simply demonstrating that paying the right people and making the right promises gets regulatory approval.

If leftists policies do not work how can there be leftist billionaires? Or do you mean right wing billionaires who virtue signal to gain the money of the leftists?

> No, you dumbass, the whole idea here is that with Ellison taking over Skydance / Paramount, the idea is that there is some balance being injected into the business.

Half of Netflix's standup specials are anti-woke marquee comedians, very few of which are actually funny. Take Andrew Schultz...shitty edgelord whose comedy persona is throwing the R word around and shitting on people different than him. Offensive comedy is like hot sauce...a little bit of offensiveness can be spicy and edgy....Schultz's material is just boring...it's like sriracha on saltines...gives the burn, but no good flavor. But hey, he interviewed Trump for some reason...not sure why Trump wanted