News: 0180254135

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Flock Uses Overseas Gig Workers To Build Its Surveillance AI (404media.co)

(Monday December 01, 2025 @10:30PM (BeauHD) from the would-you-look-at-that dept.)


An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:

> Flock, the automatic license plate reader and AI-powered camera company, [1]uses overseas workers from Upwork to train its machine learning algorithms , with training material telling workers how to review and categorize footage including images people and vehicles in the United States, according to material reviewed by 404 Media that was accidentally exposed by the company. The findings bring up questions about who exactly has access to footage collected by Flock surveillance cameras and where people reviewing the footage may be based. Flock has become a pervasive technology in the US, with its cameras present in thousands of communities that cops use every day to investigate things like carjackings. Local police have also performed numerous lookups for ICE in the system.

>

> Companies that use AI or machine learning regularly turn to overseas workers to train their algorithms, often because the labor is cheaper than hiring domestically. But the nature of Flock's business -- creating a surveillance system that constantly monitors US residents' movements -- means that footage might be more sensitive than other AI training jobs. [...] Broadly, Flock uses AI or machine learning to automatically detect license plates, vehicles, and people, including what clothes they are wearing, from camera footage. A Flock patent also mentions cameras detecting "race." It included figures on "annotations completed" and "annotator tasks remaining in queue," with annotations being the notes workers add to reviewed footage to help train AI algorithms. Tasks include categorizing vehicle makes, colors, and types, transcribing license plates, and "audio tasks." Flock recently started advertising a feature that will detect "screaming." The panel showed workers sometimes completed thousands upon thousands of annotations over two day periods. The exposed panel included a list of people tasked with annotating Flock's footage. Taking those names, 404 Media found some were located in the Philippines, according to their LinkedIn and other online profiles.

>

> Many of these people were employed through Upwork, according to the exposed material. Upwork is a gig and freelance work platform where companies can hire designers and writers or pay for "AI services," according to Upwork's website. The tipsters also pointed to several publicly available Flock presentations which explained in more detail how workers were to categorize the footage. It is not clear what specific camera footage Flock's AI workers are reviewing. But screenshots included in the worker guides show numerous images from vehicles with US plates, including in New York, Michigan, Florida, New Jersey, and California. Other images include road signs clearly showing the footage is taken from inside the US, and one image contains an advertisement for a specific law firm in Atlanta.



[1] https://www.404media.co/flock-uses-overseas-gig-workers-to-build-its-surveillance-ai/



And eventually we'll find out... (Score:3)

by ebunga ( 95613 )

At some point I'm sure it will turn out these sorts of companies are actually criminal organizations that have been using this data to break into houses or something along those lines.

Re: (Score:2)

by rogoshen1 ( 2922505 )

I just find it ironic that a guy who does this to everyone else puts out C&D letters when people publish his name and address publicly on the internet

But overall, yeah these types seem to forget that they also have names and addresses.

Re: (Score:2)

by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 )

They don't forget - they simply don't think the same rules the unwashed masses are required to live under should apply to them.

Flock off (Score:3)

by liqu1d ( 4349325 )

It feels wrong your neighbour should be submitting your face to some private company just because you had the misfortune of walking in front of their camera.

fair play (Score:1)

by noshellswill ( 598066 )

In return for the United States providing a safe haven for Flock ( and other companies ) , Flock preferentially hires USA citizens for their workforce, It's called the social contract ( or hemlock-cup for the Randists ). Pork-chop eating workers allow caviar-noshing C-Suites and investors. You say otherwise ? Then a just king would feed Flock executives to the palace lions ... gnosh gnoshgnosh ... gawd don't ya just hate it when feeding lions leave only the feet ...

No surprise (Score:2)

by abulafia ( 7826 )

No surprise that a nation that outsources [1]gaslighting itself [businessinsider.com] and cares more about making sure people don't think about its compromised phone system than [2]fixing it [theregister.com] isn't going to give a shit about who gets to share its surveillance product when the targets are just the little people.

Eventually someone will use Flock to assist with a high-profile heist of some sort, at which point it will become a problem.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/fake-twitter-accounts-elon-musk-x-location-2025-11

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/24/fcc_salt_typhoon_rules/

Fuck Flock (Score:2)

by RitchCraft ( 6454710 )

Fuck Flock

Re: (Score:2)

by awwshit ( 6214476 )

Nah, but you could show the camera your ass. Really, nothing stopping anyone from standing next to a Flock holding a big sign that blocks its view, other than the Fuck Flock message the camera can see.

shame! (Score:1)

by Anonymous Coward

Anyone who works at Flock in the USA should be ashamed of themselves.

It's time to bring back public shaming and humiliation.

So we get to my point. Surely people around here read things that
aren't on the *Officially Sanctioned Cyberpunk Reading List*. Surely we
don't (any of us) really believe that there is some big, deep political and
philosophical message in all this, do we? So if this `cyberpunk' thing is
just a term of convenience, how can somebody sell out? If cyberpunk is just a
word we use to describe a particular style and imagery in sf, how can it be
dead? Where are the profound statements that the `Movement' is or was trying
to make?
I think most of us are interested in examining and discussing literary
(and musical) works that possess a certain stylistic excellence and perhaps a
rather extreme perspective; this is what CP is all about, no? Maybe there
should be a newsgroup like, say, alt.postmodern or something. Something less
restrictive in scope than alt.cyberpunk.
-- Jeff G. Bone