The Mysterious Black Fungus From Chernobyl That May Eat Radiation (bbc.com)
- Reference: 0180231563
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/11/28/1516243/the-mysterious-black-fungus-from-chernobyl-that-may-eat-radiation
- Source link: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251125-the-mysterious-black-fungus-from-chernobyl-that-appears-to-eat-radiation
In 2007, nuclear scientist Ekaterina Dadachova at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine found that melanised fungi grew 10% faster when exposed to radioactive caesium compared to control samples, leading her to propose "radiosynthesis" -- a process where organisms convert radiation into metabolic energy. The same strain, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, traveled to the ISS in December 2018 and grew an average of 1.21 times faster over 26 days compared to Earth-based controls. Nils Averesch, a biochemist at the University of Florida and co-author of that study, remains cautious about attributing the growth boost to radiation harvesting since zero gravity could also be responsible.
[1] https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251125-the-mysterious-black-fungus-from-chernobyl-that-appears-to-eat-radiation
Re: (Score:2)
Radiation on Mars really isn't an issue. Radiation levels on Mars are on average 0.64mSv per day. Radiation levels in Ramsar, Iran are 0.71mSv per day (that's entirely natural, not some crazy weapons program the Iranians are running). Want to know how many extra cancers there are in Ramsar due to the elevated natural radiation levels? None. Absolutely none at all. In fact, Ramsar has a lower cancer rate than both other cities in Iran, and the world in general. This matches a pattern where it seems th
Re:Blast off to Mars in 2026? What are they smokin (Score:5, Interesting)
" Radiation levels on Mars are on average 0.64mSv per day. Radiation levels in Ramsar, Iran are 0.71mSv per day"
Oh really?
[1]https://marspedia.org/Radiatio... [marspedia.org]
"The average natural radiation level on Mars is 24-30 rads or 240-300 mSv per year[1][2]. This is about 40-50 times the average on Earth. "
[2]https://www.esa.int/Science_Ex... [esa.int]
"An astronaut on a mission to Mars could receive radiation doses up to 700 times higher than on our planet "
Best check your facts next time instead of relying on chatgpt or whatever AI slop you got yours from.
[1] https://marspedia.org/Radiation
[2] https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/The_radiation_showstopper_for_Mars_exploration
Re: (Score:2)
> To get people to Mars will likely require use of nuclear power. If nuclear power works to keep people alive on Mars then it can work to keep people alive on Earth. If we can pick up a few tricks on minimizing risks from radiation from nature then that just makes nuclear power an even better option.
Uh, that’s a nuclear reactor on a planet that has no protective atmosphere. When you say “minimizing risks”, just be prepared for a lot of laughter from an audience who likely knows better. The idea of any of that being anything but high risk, is a joke.
We will grasp this concept well when the first Martian meteor shower shows the human race the value of atmospheres.
Godzillomycota Chernobilli Kosmonautikus (Score:3)
Sounds like a lot of claptrap, "we did an experiment on ISS, but we did not measure the effective dose and our conclusions are inconclusive".
[1]https://www.frontiersin.org/jo... [frontiersin.org]
[1] https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.877625/full