NetChoice Sues Virginia To Block Its One-Hour Social Media Limit For Kids (theverge.com)
(Monday November 17, 2025 @05:40PM (BeauHD)
from the think-of-the-children dept.)
- Reference: 0180110987
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/11/17/215259/netchoice-sues-virginia-to-block-its-one-hour-social-media-limit-for-kids
- Source link: https://www.theverge.com/news/822475/netchoice-virginia-lawsuit-social-media-time-limit-law
NetChoice is [1]suing Virginia to block a new law that limits kids under 16 to one hour of daily social media use unless parents approve more time, arguing the rule [2]violates the First Amendment and introduces serious privacy risks through mandatory age-verification . The Verge reports:
> In addition to restricting access to legal speech, NetChoice alleges that Virginia's incoming law ( [3]SB 854 ) will require platforms to verify user ages in ways that would pose privacy and security risks. The law requires platforms to use "commercially reasonable methods," which it says include a screen that prompts the user to enter a birth date. However, NetChoice argues that Virginia could go beyond this requirement, citing [4]a post from Governor Youngkin on X, stating "platforms must verify age," potentially referring to stricter methods, like having users submit a government ID or other personal information.
>
> NetChoice, which is backed by tech giants like Meta, Google, Amazon, Reddit, and Discord, alleges that the law puts a burden on minors' ability to engage or consume speech online. "The First Amendment prohibits the government from placing these types of restrictions on accessing lawful and valuable speech, just in the same way that the government can't tell you how long you could spend reading a book, watching a television program, or consuming a documentary," Paul Taske, the co-director of the Netchoice Litigation Center, tells The Verge.
>
> "Virginia must leave the parenting decisions where they belong: with parents," Taske says. "By asserting that authority for itself, Virginia not only violates its citizens' rights to free speech but also exposes them to increased risk of privacy and security breaches."
[1] https://netchoice.org/netchoice-v-miyares-virginia/
[2] https://www.theverge.com/news/822475/netchoice-virginia-lawsuit-social-media-time-limit-law
[3] https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title59.1/chapter53/section59.1-577.1/
[4] https://x.com/GovernorVA/status/1919121419868213603
> In addition to restricting access to legal speech, NetChoice alleges that Virginia's incoming law ( [3]SB 854 ) will require platforms to verify user ages in ways that would pose privacy and security risks. The law requires platforms to use "commercially reasonable methods," which it says include a screen that prompts the user to enter a birth date. However, NetChoice argues that Virginia could go beyond this requirement, citing [4]a post from Governor Youngkin on X, stating "platforms must verify age," potentially referring to stricter methods, like having users submit a government ID or other personal information.
>
> NetChoice, which is backed by tech giants like Meta, Google, Amazon, Reddit, and Discord, alleges that the law puts a burden on minors' ability to engage or consume speech online. "The First Amendment prohibits the government from placing these types of restrictions on accessing lawful and valuable speech, just in the same way that the government can't tell you how long you could spend reading a book, watching a television program, or consuming a documentary," Paul Taske, the co-director of the Netchoice Litigation Center, tells The Verge.
>
> "Virginia must leave the parenting decisions where they belong: with parents," Taske says. "By asserting that authority for itself, Virginia not only violates its citizens' rights to free speech but also exposes them to increased risk of privacy and security breaches."
[1] https://netchoice.org/netchoice-v-miyares-virginia/
[2] https://www.theverge.com/news/822475/netchoice-virginia-lawsuit-social-media-time-limit-law
[3] https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title59.1/chapter53/section59.1-577.1/
[4] https://x.com/GovernorVA/status/1919121419868213603
More serious question (Score:2)
How does the state of Virginia know what anyone is accessing in the first place in order to enforce this law? That's more disturbing than the law itself.