Genetically Engineered Babies Are Banned in the US. But Tech Titans Are Trying to Make One Anyway (msn.com)
- Reference: 0180020192
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/25/11/09/2141233/genetically-engineered-babies-are-banned-in-the-us-but-tech-titans-are-trying-to-make-one-anyway
- Source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/genetically-engineered-babies-are-banned-tech-titans-are-trying-to-make-one-anyway/ar-AA1Q46cV
> Backed by OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and his husband, along with Coinbase co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong, the startup — called Preventive — has been quietly preparing what would amount to a biological first. They are working toward creating a child born from an embryo edited to prevent a hereditary disease.... Editing genes in embryos with the intention of creating babies from them is banned in the U.S. and many countries. Preventive has been searching for places to experiment where embryo editing is allowed, including the United Arab Emirates, according to correspondence reviewed by The Wall Street Journal...
>
> Preventive is in the vanguard of a growing number of startups, funded by some of the most powerful people in Silicon Valley, that are pushing the boundaries of fertility and working to commercialize reproductive genetic technologies. Some are working on embryo editing, while others are already selling genetic screening tools that seek to account for the influence of dozens or hundreds of genes on a trait. They say their ultimate goal is to produce babies who are free of genetic disease and resilient against illnesses. Some say they can also give parents the ability to choose embryos that will have higher IQs and preferred traits such as height and eye color. Armstrong, the cryptocurrency billionaire, is leading the charge to make embryo editing a reality. He has told people that gene-editing technology could produce children who are less prone to heart disease, with lower cholesterol and stronger bones to prevent osteoporosis. According to documents and people briefed on his plans, he is already an investor or in talks with embryo editing ventures...
>
> After the Journal approached people close to the company last month to ask about its work, Preventive announced on its website that it had raised $30 million in investment to explore embryo editing. The statement pledged not to advance to human trials "if safety cannot be established through extensive research..." Other embryo editing startups are Manhattan Genomics, co-founded by Thiel Fellow Cathy Tie, and Bootstrap Bio, which plans to conduct tests in Honduras. Both companies are in early stages.
The article notes the only known instance of children born from edited embryos was in 2018, when Chinese scientist He Jiankui "shocked the world with news that he had produced three children genetically altered as embryos to be immune to HIV. He was [2]sentenced to prison in China for three years for the illegal practice of medicine.
"He hasn't publicly shared the children's identities but says they are healthy.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/genetically-engineered-babies-are-banned-tech-titans-are-trying-to-make-one-anyway/ar-AA1Q46cV
[2] https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-scientist-who-gene-edited-babies-is-sent-to-prison-11577703233
Bet they didn't watch The X-Files (Score:2)
Otherwise they'd know what happens when you experiment with human embryos and genetics. Super soldiers and all.
Breeding issues (Score:2)
Monsanto has been able to enforce a provision in its licensing agreements with farmers buying their seeds that prevents farmers from collecting seeds from their crops and replanting new crops, without paying additional royalty.
When genetically enhanced humans become a reality (and they will), will they be allowed to breed with normal humans to create hybrids, without paying someone a royalty?
Re: (Score:2)
Wasn't this covered in "Orphan Black", where the clones all had the ASCII string "Property of Dyad Institute" encoded into their DNA? I have zero doubts that these self-serving asshats won't do something very similar with any "creations" they might make, no matter how egalitarian they make their motives sound. That they are trying to do an end run around the law of their land by going overseas says it all; they have zero ethics, and zero fucks will be given if it all goes horribly wrong.
Re: Breeding issues (Score:2)
Slavery or feudalism is often their end goal. Everything and everyone is property when money is the primary metric in your society (if it can even be called a society at that point)
Re: (Score:3)
Monsanto was able to patent the seeds. It is illegal to patent "a human organism". From [1]https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2105.html [uspto.gov],
> Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism.
[1] https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2105.html
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, but there are other enforcement mechanisms besides patenting.
Plus, when there is that kind of money involved, you can generally have a good shot of getting the laws tailored to your liking.
Re: (Score:2)
You can own a type of seed; you cannot own a human at least in the US. Now, of course, if the courts ruled that genetically modified babies were not human, all bets would be off.
Reminds me of "The Moat" (Score:2)
The short sci-fi story The Moat by Greg Egan is a real head trip of a read along these lines.
Too much money, no accountability (Score:3)
And then any semblance of morality and integrity goes out the window. Does not happen for everybody, but most people cannot handle that situation.
Begin The Eugenics Wars Has (Score:2)
Well, Star Trek may not be humanity's future, but the science fiction writers sure make good guesses at times.
Gods I hate babies (Score:1)
Babies need to have the exact debilitating genetic diseases their parents have and can only be better than everyone else by genetic lottery rather than this newfangled " science " getting involved that might in any way destabilize my world view or view of humanity.
Finally conservatives and liberals can agree on one thing: "fuck them kids!"
What exactly does that mean? (Score:2)
Does the baby not get citizenship? Is the baby killed?
Or do all the penalties form on the doctors and parents that did it.
KHANNNNNN!!!!! (Score:4, Funny)
I for one, welcome our genetically engineered overlords.