First Look at the Amazon's Nuclear Facility Planned For Washington State (geekwire.com)
- Reference: 0179818226
- News link: https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/25/10/17/2314242/first-look-at-the-amazons-nuclear-facility-planned-for-washington-state
- Source link: https://www.geekwire.com/2025/a-first-look-at-the-amazon-backed-next-generation-nuclear-facility-planned-for-washington-state/
> The facility will be located near Richland, Wash., near Energy Northwest's Columbia Generating Station nuclear plant. The initial goal is to install a cluster of four small modular reactors (SMRs) that can produce up to 320 megawatts of power, but the overall vision is to construct 12 reactors total, with a capacity of nearly one gigawatt. If all the funding, permitting and public support come together, construction should start within the next five years, with the plant coming online in the 2030s. [...] For Amazon, its support of the Cascade Advanced Energy Facility is part of a much bigger initiative. The company has set a goal of deploying 5 gigawatts of nuclear power in the U.S. by 2039.
>
> "One thing that Amazon does well is scale technology," said Brandon Oyer, Amazon Web Services' head of power and water for North and South America. "We've done this over and over again ... We'll go and make an investment and then learn how to scale that up, drive out cost, make it more readily available." Targeting SMRs for amplification was a "natural fit," Oyer added. The company believes nuclear aligns with its climate ambitions. Amazon matches all of its electricity use with clean power and is the largest corporate purchaser of wind, solar and other renewable sources. That said, it is struggling to cut its carbon footprint to reach a goal of net-zero emissions by 2040 as the AI-boom stokes energy use.
>
> Amazon reported that its carbon footprint grew by 6% last year. Amazon has dibs on half of the 320 megawatts of electricity that will be generated by the first four reactors at the Washington site, but will take all of it if the power prices are too high for local utilities to afford. Cullen said that if everything goes well with the initial phase, it would be straightforward to build the other eight reactors as the permits will encompass the complete build out. The added reactors would produce enough electricity for about one million homes and should come at a lower cost. "Amazon recognizes the role they can -- and are willing -- to play," Cullen said. The company can take some of the early risk and bring that catalytic capital, he said, which is "every, very difficult for utilities to do."
[1] https://www.geekwire.com/2025/a-first-look-at-the-amazon-backed-next-generation-nuclear-facility-planned-for-washington-state/
Re: (Score:2)
What is their plan to dispose of nuclear waste? A scientist and a reasonable person would say to move it to a place with rare and mild earthquakes, and bury it, but that is not being done. As it is, it is in a path of a 9 richter scale earthquake, and massive tsunamis that will spread the waste far and wide. I realize that anti-science people have taken over America, but please don't be so ignorant that you will kill your own children.
Re: (Score:2)
Hanford announced last week that their spent fuel vitrification plant is officially in operation, converting nuclear waste into glass ingots that can be safely stored for millenia. If they keep going for about a century they might be able to vitrify the spent fuel we already have. But we still have no place to store the ingots.
All these small modular reactors have the same deficits. They require high assay low enriched uranium (HALEU) produced only in Russia. They're a proliferation risk. They require a sub
Re: (Score:2)
Not all are HALEU designs, NuScale in particular isn't. I'm a little curious why NuScale hasn't had more success in moving forward with construction of one of their designs as they seem to be significantly further along the process than everybody else. For a project with a 50-year design life it would seem that being able to be operational 2-3 years faster would be a meaningful advantage.
Re: (Score:2)
> in a path of a 9 richter scale earthquake
The site is hundreds of miles from the Cascadia fault line.
> and massive tsunamis
There is a major mountain range (the Cascades) and many miles of desert between the site and the coast.
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you fer setting me straight on that. Now tell me how the clean up is going from the Nuclear Bomb development in Washington State? How many thousands of square miles are un-inhabitable? What will be done with the nuclear waste generated by Billionaires trying to pad their pockets?
The reason it was "soured on" is nuclear waste. (Score:2)
The reason they chose Washington State is that it is the most radioactive state on the USA. It is the place where nuclear bombs were born. When politicians and Oligarchs give power to Scientists then I will believe in nuclear power. Until then, the waste will sit for 6,000 years where it is generated, and the Oligarchs will make a few extra Billions that they could otherwise find in the back of their couch. The average people who are just trying to eat, well screw them.
Re:The reason it was "soured on" is nuclear waste. (Score:4, Informative)
Indeed. Make money now (even if these assholes have massively more than they need and deserve), let others pay later.
Honestly the waste wouldn't be what worries me (Score:1)
Not that it's a good thing since corners will be cut. Got to make those quarterly profit projections.
But what worries me is when they start cutting back on necessary maintenance. That's what happened in Fukushima and it'll happen with these slap dash nuclear reactors being thrown up to feed AI data centers.
10 years. That's how long the city of Fukushima had to be evacuated. If you lived in that area around the disaster you just lost everything except what you could carry when you fled.
America is
Re: (Score:2)
I'm good with nuclear power in the USA if we move the waste deep underground in Utah or Colorado. But the politicians in the Senate are NIMBYs, and will not allow it. Grease that wheel and I will give a green light. Keeping it in Washington State where level 9 earthquakes and tsunamis will happen, just seems stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
Very few problems like cancer, and deformities in human beings.
Do they have a prototype that did run a few years? (Score:2)
No? Then this is essentially a scam.
THE Amazon's? (Score:2)
Will it be powering the Brazilian rainforest?
Is Queen Hippolyta in charge?