ISPs Object as California Lets Renters Opt Out of Bulk Broadband Plans (arstechnica.com)
(Thursday October 16, 2025 @11:33AM (msmash)
from the lobbying-losses dept.)
- Reference: 0179807774
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/10/16/1533223/isps-object-as-california-lets-renters-opt-out-of-bulk-broadband-plans
- Source link: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/10/california-says-landlords-cant-make-tenants-pay-for-an-isp-they-dont-want/
The California Broadband & Video Association has [1]objected to legislation signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on October 15 that allows apartment tenants to opt out of mandatory bulk billing for internet service. The cable industry group called the measure "an anti-affordability bill masked as consumer protection."
The association said property owners would have to provide refunds to tenants who decline internet service provided through building contracts. The law "undermines the basis of the cost savings and will lead to bulk billing being phased out," the group said. Assembly member Rhodesia Ransom, who authored the bill, said lobby groups for internet providers and real estate companies worked hard to defeat it.
The association told the Sacramento Bee it was disappointed Newsom signed the legislation because it would be "an impediment to utilizing an effective tool" that helped middle-class Californians get discounted rates. The law takes effect January 1. Tenants who are denied the right to opt out can deduct subscription costs from their rent.
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/10/california-says-landlords-cant-make-tenants-pay-for-an-isp-they-dont-want/
The association said property owners would have to provide refunds to tenants who decline internet service provided through building contracts. The law "undermines the basis of the cost savings and will lead to bulk billing being phased out," the group said. Assembly member Rhodesia Ransom, who authored the bill, said lobby groups for internet providers and real estate companies worked hard to defeat it.
The association told the Sacramento Bee it was disappointed Newsom signed the legislation because it would be "an impediment to utilizing an effective tool" that helped middle-class Californians get discounted rates. The law takes effect January 1. Tenants who are denied the right to opt out can deduct subscription costs from their rent.
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/10/california-says-landlords-cant-make-tenants-pay-for-an-isp-they-dont-want/
translation: (Score:2)
by k3v0 ( 592611 )
ISPs are mad they can't charge people who don't have the option to not sign up for their overpriced services. got it.
Re: (Score:2)
by LuniticusTheSane ( 1195389 )
And landlords are mad that they can't take a kickback from the ISPs to force their tenants into terrible deals.
If something is good... (Score:2)
by MpVpRb ( 1423381 )
...people choose it voluntarily and often pay for it.
If something is forced on people, it's often not good.
If "bulk billing" is a good deal, customers will choose it.
Re: (Score:2)
by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )
Bulk billing being tied to your housing kind of makes it difficult to decline.
As a result (Score:2)
by marcle ( 1575627 )
the ISPs will be forced to raise their rates due to the elimination of a scam, oops, I mean, the increased cost of doing business
I am shocked. (Score:2)
by Inglix the Mad ( 576601 )
SHOCKED! I thought ISP's hated consumers not having their choice dictated!
I'm half-joking.
Great; it shouldn't be a thing. (Score:2)
> The law "undermines the basis of the cost savings and will lead to bulk billing being phased out," the group said.
Good; it's monopolistic, predatory, and ultimately unnecessary. The entire practice is aimed at driving consistency and forced adoption rates, not anything else.