News: 0179774520

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

SpaceX Starship Hits Key Milestones Before Stunning Splashdown (cnn.com)

(Monday October 13, 2025 @11:30PM (BeauHD) from the 11th-time's-the-charm dept.)


SpaceX's Starship megarocket [1]successfully completed its 11th test flight , achieving major milestones like engine relight, satellite deployment, and a controlled splashdown in the Indian Ocean. From a report:

> This mission marks the second clean test run for Version 2, following a successful showing during its last test mission in August. Earlier this year, however, Starship Version 2 suffered three in-flight failures and an explosive accident during ground testing. Today's test mission is expected to be the last for the current iteration of Starship prototypes. The company has said it will debut a scaled up Version 3 for the next flight.

You can watch a recording of the launch [2]on YouTube .



[1] https://www.cnn.com/science/live-news/spacex-starship-flight-11-launch-10-13-25

[2] https://www.youtube.com/live/YrcLIvoiKfw?si=nxtRvGfu33mIaipj&t=7575



I'm rooting for it!! (Score:2)

by ndsurvivor ( 891239 )

It seems like a "civilization advance" that could enable a lot of cool stuff!!

Re: I'm rooting for it!! (Score:3)

by Samuel Silverstein ( 10475946 )

This isn't government funded.

Re: (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

Spacex's contracts are almost entirely government. The private organizations that launch satellites do so on the back of the government funded launches.

So yeah it's government funded. Like all of Elon musk's businesses it wouldn't exist without heavy government subsidies.

It is slightly less obvious because here in America we like to obfuscate the subsidies so we can pretend the free market is doing everything. It goes back to the Cold war and Ronald Reagan types constantly going on about how governm

Re: (Score:1)

by 0123456 ( 636235 )

> The private organizations that launch satellites do so on the back of the government funded launches.

I can't even figure out what that's supposed to mean.

Most SpaceX launches are now Starlink launches funded by Starlink revenue.

Starship is primarily funded by Musk and third-party investment, with only a billion or two from the government to develop a Starship-based lunar lander because it was the cheapest option offered when NASA put the contract out for bids. You could argue that's not really somethin

Re: (Score:2)

by Applehu Akbar ( 2968043 )

> This isn't government funded.

And that's is exactly WHY Startship represents economy, not waste.

When the government attacked the problem of getting crews and cargo into orbit, it developed Space Shuttle, which required a standing army of 35,000 people just to keep it running. It never achieved its reusability and reliability goals. SpaceX came into the picture with Falcon-9, whose reusable first stage cut the cost of getting to orbit by 90%, and achieved 100% reliability. Starship is on the way to reusability of both stages and fast t

Re: (Score:1)

by 0123456 ( 636235 )

Don't forget the Senate Launch System, which is possibly the most expensive launcher ever built in terms of cost per pound to orbit.

If Musk gets Starship working and figures out in-orbit refuelling then SLS becomes pretty much obsolete overnight.

Re: I'm rooting for it!! (Score:2)

by i_ate_god ( 899684 )

I suppose the question to ask is, would SpaceX have been as successful if not for all the preceding work and existing infrastructure/knowledge that was created by the government?

Re: (Score:2)

by ndsurvivor ( 891239 )

I think most people in America should be asking our Billionaires if they would be successful if not for all the preceding work and existing infrastructure/knowledge that was created by our Government.

Re: (Score:2)

by ndsurvivor ( 891239 )

I don't recall the V-2 landing where it took off ;-).

Re: (Score:2)

by RitchCraft ( 6454710 )

SpaceX is actually doing something useful with their money, unlike those other shit bag companies wasting billions (trillions by now?) on "AI" and the energy sucking data centers used to house all of our stolen data.

Re: (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

Tesla is sitting on 800 million worth of unsold cybertrucks. The current plan is to sell them off to SpaceX and xai.

Re: (Score:2)

by Valgrus Thunderaxe ( 8769977 )

I would never buy a Cybertruck but man, they're popular where I am. There are three on my block, alone.

Re: (Score:2)

by abulafia ( 7826 )

San Jose?

I will never understand the desire to drive an ornamental dumpster.

Re: (Score:2)

by ndsurvivor ( 891239 )

Think of all the money Zuck is dumping into the "metaverse". I checked it out recently, and I am very skeptical. That seems like multi-Billions tossed down the toilet. It makes me think how people used to say that the Communist system fails because of Government picking winners and losers. Now with Unfettered Capitalism, I fear we are going to lose because a few idiots are directing massive resources toward the toilet.

Re: I'm rooting for it!! (Score:3)

by zawarski ( 1381571 )

Why wouldn't you root for it? That's one step closer to Elon and his followers leaving for mars!

Re: (Score:2)

by ndsurvivor ( 891239 )

Question asked, and answered... lol.

Color me skeptical, (Score:2)

by jpellino ( 202698 )

Three years of launches, and they have yet to complete an orbit.

Somehow all in the next calendar year, they expect to regularly orbit, AND orbit a propellant target AND complete propellant transfer AND orbit a stable propellant depot AND perform a dozen or more propellant transfers AND land an unmanned Starship HLS on the moon AND launch 5 Starships to the Mars surface AND land a Starship with a working rover on the moon surface.

His delivery of car functions and price targets have slipped by years.

Is there

There must be more to life than having everything.
-- Maurice Sendak