How Plastic Goods Took Over the World, Creating a Throwaway Culture (bloomberg.com)
- Reference: 0179746512
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/10/10/1746232/how-plastic-goods-took-over-the-world-creating-a-throwaway-culture
- Source link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-10/how-plastic-goods-took-over-the-world-creating-a-throwaway-culture
Excerpts from a Bloomberg story: After World War II, the plastics industry made a conscious pivot. Lloyd Stouffer, an industry figure, openly said plastics should move from durable goods to disposables because companies make more money selling something a thousand times than once. The industry sold consumers on hygiene, convenience, modernity and easier household management. McDonald's dropped polystyrene clamshells in the late 1980s under activist pressure but simply swapped one single-use product for another.
Paper containers still cannot be recycled well once food soaks in. The old diaper-service model disappeared. Companies collected, washed and returned cloth diapers like the milkman, but plastics helped kill that business model. Chaudhuri argues companies built their businesses on disposability and will not change unless regulation forces everyone to move together. Executives admit that if they launch a reusable product but competitors do not, they lose market share and face shareholder backlash. Packaging standardization would improve recycling economics. Colored plastics like red shampoo bottles cannot be recycled in a closed loop and are down-cycled into gray products like pipes.
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-10/how-plastic-goods-took-over-the-world-creating-a-throwaway-culture
Cloth diapers? (Score:1, Troll)
I raised two kids and I can't imagine dealing with cloth diapers! I heard enough about them from my grandparents who raised Boomer kids to never want to return to the Bad Old Days.
We need diapers that biodegrade better, for sure. Plant-derived plastics, maybe, but cloth? gtfo
Re:Cloth diapers? (Score:4, Insightful)
If you have a washing machine at home and the hookup for a toilet, cloth diapers are not that much more difficult than disposables. Both my kids used cloth with little issue. Solids can be easily washed off. If we still had affordable services to launder diapers, even better. I would still use disposables during travel when washing services aren't convenient or available. That said, there is the interesting question of balance - which is "worse" for the environment, the solid waste from disposable diapers versus the increased water usage for cloth diapers?
Re: (Score:2)
For our first kid, we used resuable. Reusable diapers mean you must do laundry every day. Even if you have enough diapers that you can skip a day, longer than that, and the odor becomes intolerable. So, for the most part, it's laundry every frelling day, and you cannot do something like forget to move it to the dryer.
That relentlessness, on top of sleeplessness, on top of full-time job, meant hubby put his foot down for kid number 2, and we switched to disposables. It wasn't about convenience, it was ab
Re: (Score:2)
"Solids" doesn't describe the goo that came out of my kids all too often, and I'm not gonna wash my clothes and such in something that was a vat of e. coli the load before and which can't be autoclaved. YMMV, glad it worked for you.
Re: (Score:3)
Diaper services still exist - I'm guessing the author either doesn't have kids or is justifying why they didn't use one.
Anyway... when our daughter was small, we used a diaper service. It worked quite well and really wasn't a big deal.
Re: (Score:2)
> Diaper services still exist
I just looked and I can't find a diaper service closer than 80 miles away in a rich suburb where there are several to choose from.
> I'm guessing the author either doesn't have kids or is justifying why they didn't use one.
I actually said "I raised two kids ...", why guess?
Re: (Score:2)
> I actually said "I raised two kids ...", why guess?
You're the author?
Re: (Score:3)
It's about these things in balance.
Suburban homes sourcing most / all of their drinking water from bottles is insulting unless there is a Flint water situation due to toxic city leadership. Having a crate of bottled water as backup / leaving the home is more reasonable. Abolishing straws or going to paper ones was always at the opposite end an absurd, insulting virtue signaling. When it comes to changing what something is made from to make it easier to biodegrade, the first question should always be energy
Plastics and the materials sector... (Score:2)
Need a way to create a stable molecule for plastics, that has a "Master Link" that once pulled, either through chemical or other low energy process... Can quickly and easily break down the molecule chain and return the components to their original, individual, state. "Absolute 100% Recycling" aka, the holy grail of materials science. ;-)
Public hygiene also went up (Score:2)
But sure, let us focus only on the cons of single-use utensils.
Efficient (Score:3)
I started weighing out food while cooking a few years ago. One thing that struck me was how light weight most plastic packaging is. A plastic bag can hold easily hold 100 times its weight, making the packaging weight basically negligible for transporting food.
Unfortunately, disposing of plastic packaging is not a negligible task...
Fully biodegradable == fully recyclable (Score:2)
I don't get why disposable paper products, assuming no plastic coatings of course, keep getting dumped on in these type articles. In my mind disposable paper is an idea food container. It's very good at contributing to the compost right along with the unused food.
Ok.. but (Score:1)
I’m not even so sure if the general public would support it.. we learned that straws suck or rather don’t suck well now that they’re not plastic.
Re: (Score:3)
> I’m not even so sure if the general public would support it.. we learned that straws suck or rather don’t suck well now that they’re not plastic.
I know this is some cutting-edge shit not even AI could think of, but try and follow me here. What if, a planet learned to use that hole under their nose as a replacement?