China Confirms Solar Panel Projects Are Irreversibly Changing Desert Ecosystems (glassalmanac.com)
- Reference: 0179726330
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/10/09/1058217/china-confirms-solar-panel-projects-are-irreversibly-changing-desert-ecosystems
- Source link: https://glassalmanac.com/china-confirms-solar-panel-projects-are-irreversibly-changing-desert-ecosystems/
> China's giant solar parks aren't just changing the power mix -- they may be [1]changing the ground beneath them . Fresh field data point to cooler soils, extra moisture, and pockets of greening, though lasting ecological shifts will hinge on design and long-term care.
>
> [...] A team studying one of the largest photovoltaic parks in China, the Gonghe project in the Talatan Desert, found a striking difference between what was happening under the panels and what lay just beyond. They used a detailed framework measuring dozens of indicators -- everything from soil chemistry to microbial life -- and discovered that the micro-environment beneath the panels was noticeably healthier. The reasons track with physics: shade cools the surface and slows evaporation, letting scarce soil moisture linger longer; field experiments in western China report measurable soil-moisture gains beneath shaded arrays.
>
> Simple shade from panel rows can create a gentler microclimate at ground level, cutting wind stress and helping fragile seedlings establish. In other desert locations like Gansu and the Gobi, year-round field data tell a similar story. Soil temperatures beneath arrays tend to be cooler during the day and a bit warmer at night than surrounding ground, with humidity patterns shifting in tandem -- conditions that can make harsh surfaces more habitable when paired with basic land care. Even small shifts like these can help re-establish vegetation -- if combined with erosion control and water management. These aren't wildflowers blooming overnight, but they are signs that utility-scale solar can double as a modest micro-restorer.
[1] https://glassalmanac.com/china-confirms-solar-panel-projects-are-irreversibly-changing-desert-ecosystems/
Irreversibly? (Score:2)
No doubt solar panel projects are changing ecosystems.
How do they know it's irreversible?
Also, is the change for the better or for the worse?
From TFA:
"Fresh field data point to cooler soils, extra moisture, and pockets of greening, though lasting ecological shifts will hinge on design and long-term care."
Sounds like it's for the better and not necessarily irreversible.
Re: (Score:1)
It looks like the thing to do is use the farm as long as it's profitable, then leave them in place and build a new farm next to it. Nature builds on nature. A big patch of scrub can attract insects and tie down moisture and sand, which can make it stable enough for something bigger to grow, and so on. You're not going to get a jungle without more rain but you can shrink deserts and build habitats and diversity.
Speculative (Score:2)
> lasting ecological shifts will hinge on design and long-term care.
We don't really know that for sure. It may improve the odds, but neither desertification nor greening require human intervention, nor is human intervention necessarily going to achieve the desired outcome. Life, uh... finds a way. (Except when it doesn't.) But for all we know (and what seems most likely absent evidence to the contrary), this is just a temporary oasis of sorts that will last only as long as the structures on the site.
Re: (Score:2)
You're saying we don't have any control over our environment?
You right-wing nuts are something else...
Healthy? (Score:2)
Wouldn't the healthiest thing be the natural state?
Re: (Score:2)
there is no more natural state in the world.
Re: (Score:2)
> there is no more natural state in the world.
Equally true: there is no state on the world that isn't natural.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure. When you find something on this planet that is still in it's "natural state" after 200 years of human industrialization, let us know.
Similar in Arizona (Score:2)
Arizona showing the same thing, granted this one is next to farms, but you can see some vegetation on the ground. [1]https://www.google.com/maps/@32.9222772,-112.9754652,2543m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAwNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D [google.com]
[1] https://www.google.com/maps/@32.9222772,-112.9754652,2543m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAwNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Re: (Score:2)
*Looking at the rest of that picture and noticing both the extensive desert agriculture and the road running through labeled "Watermelon Road"*
Oh good, I'm so glad we're using the Southwest's limited water on growing frick'n watermelons in the desert.
Complete tangent from the article I know but I just found it discouraging.