US Workers Are Becoming More Stressed About Finances, BofA Survey Shows (reuters.com)
- Reference: 0178995762
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/09/03/1849215/us-workers-are-becoming-more-stressed-about-finances-bofa-survey-shows
- Source link: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/us-workers-are-becoming-more-stressed-about-finances-bofa-survey-shows-2025-09-03/
> Of the respondents polled by BofA, 47% of employed people said they had a sense of financial well-being, dropping from 52% at the start of the year. Nearly 85% of consumers carried some type of personal debt, while 26% of the workforce was seeking help in areas such as emergency savings, paying down debt, and overall financial wellness, compared with 13% in 2023, according to the May survey of more than 1,000 people working full-time.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/us-workers-are-becoming-more-stressed-about-finances-bofa-survey-shows-2025-09-03/
77 million Americans maybe (Score:4, Insightful)
But I think you're underestimating how much voter suppression and gerrymandering is going on over here. There is solid evidence that approximately 7 million Americans tried to vote last year had just couldn't. About half of those got stopped using illegal challenges to their signatures or their voter registrations. The other half would show up to vote on election Day and find a 7 hour wait.
There's also some evidence that worse was going on. Google around and you will find all sorts of scary shit. Most notably there are several districts where Kamala Harris was winning until exactly 250 votes and then Trump broke away. You can't bring up anything like that without being called a lunatic because Trump spent the last 8 years screaming about stop the steal.
Honestly though the voter suppression is probably a bigger deal. The big wall that protected voting rights, the voting Rights act, got struck down by a corrupt Court.
On top of that the amount and scale of propaganda is unlike anything I have ever seen in my entire life or frankly in human history outside of North Korea or Russia.
I watched Joe Biden listening to a question off camera and watched Newsweek report that he was staring off into the distance after they had crop the picture.
Meanwhile Donald Trump lost his marbles 20 minutes into a town hall meeting and just danced to his iPod playlist and that was played off in the media as bringing him closer to the voters...
It's so bad we had to create a whole new term for what the media was doing, sane washing.
That said I do understand the frustration. I don't think there was anyone who didn't know Trump was a convicted felon or shouldn't have known. The fact that Trump is a pedophile is readily available information. And then you have the other 25 credible accusations of rape not to mention the actual rape conviction that is technically adjudicated sexual battery but I'm pretty sure anyone with a daughter would look at that and call it rape.
I don't necessarily think the really stupid should be blamed. I mentioned this on another comment but I had a dumb as dishwater neighbor who voted Republican because she just could not parse information competently enough or think critically enough to know better. If you're going to take advantage of stupid people that's a bad thing and it's hard to get angry at people who can barely read.
But there is certainly a ton of people who knew better and voted for the sake of anger or hate. And yeah those fuckers can fuck the fuck off.
Re: (Score:1)
How about start treating red districts as Confederate. It'd be just like good old days. Get as many miles long rope, thickness doesn't matter. Soak em into flammable liquid or grease. Line em up all around homes, business, dried plants & trees with help of global warming to lighten em up driving the Confederates out as an example. Violence? Sure, so was Civil War and it looks like that war isn't over. We're still living in it. Trump started the violence on January 6th. So he opened the door and I'm not
Violence doesn't really work (Score:2)
Violence requires command structures and command structures are right wing. So all violence does is create more right wingers and more red States.
The only way out of this is good old-fashioned dull as dishwater voting rights
Re: (Score:3)
Fuck you, half the country didn't want this, yelled and screamed this would happen, and doesn't deserve to suffer. You should be banned for that comment. Better yet, you should be made to suffer that what you wish on others. Asshole.
Re: (Score:2)
Too bad. Your shitty political system, with its impotent checks and balances and imperial powers handed over the to the President, made this possible. Your all frogs boiling in the Framers' failed experiment.
I have zero sympathy at this point. Supposedly the Framers put in a really top tier solution to tyranny, but instead it's mainly being used to take out schoolchildren. Everything about your country has become repulsive and self-destructive. I just hope my country can hang on.
Re: (Score:2)
I hope your country is overrun with fleeing Americans.
Re: (Score:3)
Unfortunately, sane and thoughtful Americans will suffer because we didn't do enough. We all have Trumpy friends who we didn't yell at enough. Dollars we could have sent to voter outreach in PA and elsewhere, but didn't. I am guilty of overestimating my countrymen.
Do I deserve to live in a mismanaged kleptocracy? No more than I would deserve to die if I thought my Lyft driver was high: it's a foreseeable consequence, but not a just result.
This will be a painful learning experience for the Republic, but cl
Re: (Score:2)
I need to speak with your supervisor, this propaganda isn't believable enough on account of not making sense.
Come on man you got a job, millions of Americans would kill for that.
Re: (Score:2)
So strange we'd rather have a senile man than a senile crypto-nazi.
Besides Reagan was practically 8 years at Bernies and not nearly as damaging as Trump. (a little american joke, you might not get it comrade)
Re: (Score:1)
> (a little american joke, you might not get it comrade)
In Soviet Russia our humor is like our food, not everyone gets it.
I can't blame the guy for his anger (Score:2)
But the phrase have the day you voted for goes both ways. If you voted for Democrats last election you should have yourself a damn fine day.
Now you won't because of the 77 million numb skulls who voted for Trump. But I think the point is that the anger is supposed to be directed at the people who voted for Trump not the people who damn well knew better.
Re: (Score:2)
There's absolutely no reason to ban someone for a comment. Hoping someone suffers is not nice, but is not the same as advocating violence. However, your comment ("should be *made* to suffer") is very clearly advocating violence. Check your logic there.
Re: (Score:2)
Dude Slashdot is not some sort of free speech libertarian democracy. It's a business.
They do ban people for shitting the place up believe it not and i say good riddance. I know we all started out young and optimistic but there are a bunch of places you can go on the net and be a shitty poster and we're not there because they suck ass in 2025.
Re: (Score:2)
The OG comment got modded Troll. Problem solved. Drop the cancel culture already. It's childish. If someone is wrong, either ignore them or explain to them why they're wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Which guy is gonna go away if we just ignore? The one who stalks another user and is always posting porno or the one who who is doing blatant anti semitism?
If you were hanging with your friends and guy walks up to you all and just starts taking a big ol sloppy shit on the floor. "Don't cancel them guys just ignore them".
Vainly someone tries to tell them "hey don't shit on the floor don't you know it's unhygeni-" *INTENSE SHIT NOISES*
Re: (Score:2)
> half the country didn't want this
Is that half country right now on the streets, participating in a general strike, paralyzing trade and traffic on most cities, and causing massive economic damage to the billionaires and their pocket politicians?
Or is the vast, vast, VAST majority of that half country passively allowing all of this to happen unchallenged, unwilling to dirty their hands in active subversive political action?
If the latter, well, inaction is a choice, and all choices have consequences. Hence, to all Americans who are day in, d
Billionaires are sleeping just fine (Score:3)
The American dream is dead.
Re: (Score:1)
> The American dream is dead.
Naw, it's just resting. There, it moved! I didn't touch it. Now, look, you've stunned it. You know American dreams gets stunned easily. If it weren't nailed in place the American dream would FOOOM and and be lost.
Seriously though I'm not seeing the American dream as dead. It's having a bit of a "reset" in my mind. We've had a kind of political nightmare for a bit here with the political parties needing to rethink their positions as demographics are having a rapid shift with Baby Boomers reaching reti
Re: (Score:1)
That started in 1971, when we went off the Gold Standard: [1]https://www.epi.org/productivi... [epi.org]; it lets the politicians inflate the non-backed currency, which doesn't effect people with their money in other assets.
[1] https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/
Wild that this is twelve years old... (Score:1)
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPKKQnijnsM
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. It's almost like they know climate change is going to cause an inevitable, unbelievable disaster, have set themselves up for living with $500 cans of Campbell's soup, and are looking at colonizing Mars.
Something is happening here. There might be reason behind political support for this skew. I'm very frightened it's not just limitless greed.
Re: (Score:2)
> Yeah. It's almost like they know climate change is going to cause an inevitable, unbelievable disaster, have set themselves up for living with $500 cans of Campbell's soup, and are looking at colonizing Mars.
> Something is happening here. There might be reason behind political support for this skew. I'm very frightened it's not just limitless greed.
It's a combination of limitless greed and algorithmic "respect" for the troll game. The algorithms promote engagement, and rage is extremely engaging. It earns more clicks, pulls in more views, generates more data-flow, and earns more advertising dollars. We literally trolled our way into electing the loudest asshole in the country to the highest office. Isn't the future glorious?
Re: (Score:2)
Between then and now there was 2 democratic and 1.5 republican administrations. And it did not get like this overnight in 2012. So it was trending in this direction for many years before regardless of who had the power. So we should stop pretending that the next "my" candidate will fix this. This will never be fixed by a president. And it is unlikely that taxes will fix this as the "representatives" are in that 1 percent that everyone loves to hate so much.
Yeah but how about those cheap eggs? (Score:3, Insightful)
Honestly I don't blame anyone who is so dumb that they actually thought Trump would be beneficial to them economically. I had a next door neighbor, ardent republican, five kids from three dads and voted Republican consistently even though she was only alive because a Democrat past the law that paid for the heart surgery she needed and one of her kids was only alive because again same Democrat paid for the surgery that kid needed. Never mind all five kids were raised on food stamps...
She was a hard worker. She had retrained at least three times in her life for careers that were already on the way out when she was being retrained. Consistently taken advantage of by basically everyone.
But dangnabbit she just thought the Republicans were more patriotic so she showed up to the polls every other year and voted for them. And she wouldn't hear anything else.
Eventually she lost the house she was living in when the banks stole it from her along with all her equity in the fallout from the 2008 market crash. Not too long after that I moved away for work and have been stuck in apartments ever since.
But I can't get too angry at her because well, she's just not that bright. You can't really get too angry at somebody being taken advantage of like that.
The fuckers I really hate are the trumpers around here who aren't so fucking stupid that they don't realize Trump was going to be bad for the economy.
Those fuckers new damn well what was going to happen but they thought they were going to get away with it. And some of them might.
Those are the ones that I reserved my full and unrestrained hatred for. The kind of person who voted for Trump because they don't like queer people or they are worried they're going to get a few too many beers in them and say the n-word in public or they just want to see some people get hurt.
And I know damn well they're out there. People who knew full well what they were voting for and why. The kind of assholes who would yell about TDS at me when I tried warning people about what was coming.
Re: (Score:3)
I live in dairy farm country. The reason eggs got so expensive was an outbreak of avian flu that caused farmers to slaughter most of their laying stock to protect the rest. It was so catastrophic because they were in cages, weren't healthy to begin with, and were stacked within less than a foot of each other in all directions (unless you got top bunk).
Meanwhile, non-factory farmed eggs are now cheaper. I think I like the price of eggs where they are, now that I don't have to worry about salmonella. Maybe re
Canada had fewer problems (Score:2)
And cheaper eggs because they more tightly regulate the conditions.
I am genuinely curious what made you think it was inappropriate to respond to me. Are you just a right winger? A trump supporter?
I'd be curious why. Since you personally experienced that right wing ideology does not work.
If you're just bugged by the amount of politics we are all in our late 40s to our mid-60s. Heck some of us are pushing 70. So politics and society kind of dominate our lives.
Like how if we properly regulated
Re: (Score:2)
> but people should know why their eggs became so costly.
You're absolutely right. Anyone and everyone that was paying attention at the time knew why the price of eggs shot up. Oddly enough, the Venn diagram of people with that knowledge doesn't overlap that much with people that thought Trump was the guy to fix it.
Re: (Score:3)
Perhaps the democrats should pick better candidates. When your opposition is a felon that is disliked by most people and your opposition still gets elected that should speak VOLUMES to the choice your party made for a candidate.
Re: (Score:2)
> Perhaps the democrats should pick better candidates. When your opposition is a felon that is disliked by most people and your opposition still gets elected that should speak VOLUMES to the choice your party made for a candidate.
It's still a puzzle for me. I'm not American, BTW, so that might make it more difficult for me to comprehend.
I simply can't understand why people would opt for Trump over *any* other candidate. I know about disgruntlement in the rust belt. And sure, I understand that in any country you might have up to about 10% of the voters supporting some ultra right wing party, or some other wacky extreme group. But *half* of the US population thought that Trump would be a good choice...
I find it baffling.
Link to source (Score:2)
I think linking to Reuters as a news source is generally acceptable. However, they were just rehashing some bits from a [1]press release from Bank of America [bankofamerica.com], who actually did the survey (mostly about workplace benefits, like employee assistance programs) and [2]posted their own report [bankofamerica.com]. Reuters and Slashdot ought to have linked to that instead.
[1] https://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/content/newsroom/press-releases/2025/09/bofa-report--percentage-of-workers-seeking-near-term-financial-g.html
[2] https://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/content/dam/newsroom/docs/2025/2025%20Workplace%20Benefits%20Report%20_%20FINAL%2008.26.25%20_%20RPT-02-25-0242_f_ADA.pdf
Wow (Score:3, Insightful)
I’m so glad we didn’t vote for the woman who laughed.
Re: (Score:3)
But a convicted felon who is also clearly losing his mind was a prime, viable candidate...
Re: (Score:1)
Really? I'm already being modded Troll? What I said is 100% true. This has been an alert for mod abuse. Some people just don't seem to like reality.
Re: (Score:3)
You voted for the wrong person and are blaming someone else.
My hands were tied! (Score:3)
Look the democrats lied, proven fact, also they did cringy stuff, also they're not perfect, and also they talk down to me on social media.
So of course I had to vote for a senile crypto-nazi whose daughter vacations with Putin's ex-girlfriend.
My hands were tied.
Re: (Score:3)
> also they did cringy stuff, also they're not perfect, and also they talk down to me on social media.
I don't think it's appreciated enough how much this actually explains voting patterns. Political theory of "I'm most influenced by the last person to be mean to me online"
Also you'll see that tactic used everywhere on conservative media; find 2-4 crazy posts on social media and use those to represent the Democratic position.
Re: My hands were tied! (Score:1)
So will you stop banning opinions you don't like to have a chance of winning an election again, or will you double down on banning and alienate even more voters?
Re: (Score:2)
Democrats seem to have a hard time grasping exactly why they lost to Trump a second time. Republicans are clearly not the only ones who have difficulty with reality.
Re: (Score:2)
You sound like a wife beater.
"Look what you made me do !"
Re: (Score:2)
Pointing out her laughter was a clever way to attack her for being a woman without directly attacking her for being a woman.
The problem the Democrats have is they don't have anywhere to park their nepo babies. Harris's campaign was run by an incompetent nepo baby who shut down walz when he was making solid gains by calling Republicans weird.
When Republican has a nepo baby they have tons of billionaire cash so they can just send that nepo baby off to a right-wing think tank where they can't do any ha
Re: (Score:3)
You miss the point. The problem they DON'T HAVE is being a felon pedo rapist who had had many businesses go bankrupt and is only out for himself. It should have been enough that they didn't have that problem that people chose to vote for them. That's good I see it from Canada anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
The way I see it from Canada is more like this, to paraphrase the choice;
a) Lets all join hands and sing Kumbaya, or
b) Lets burn the whole shitty system down.
That more Americans seem to prefer b) is not really a surprise to me.
Re: (Score:2)
> She was just an awful candidate.
I keep hearing that, yet [1]the facts [youtu.be] point to an interesting comparison.
[1] https://youtu.be/TypbhVGri7U?t=150
Re: (Score:2)
Lot of strong opinions from the AC crowd. Scared widdle babies.
Re: (Score:2)
> I’m so glad we didn’t vote for the woman who laughed.
I can't speak for everyone in the survey, but while we bicker about tariffs on cheap chinese shit, it's housing costs that are killing me. Neither side of politics is going to or can do anything about this. That our homes are now our source of wealth means prices have to keep rising. Therefore the supply is artificially restricted by state and local politics. Anyone not owning a home today isn't going to in the future, and for those people rent just keeps going up.
Re: (Score:2)
> Neither side of politics is going to or can do anything about this.
> Going to? Definitely not right now but maybe if the problem gets bad enough.
> Can do though? State mandated housing quotas for all counties are a thing in some states now for instance. They could go farther, especially in some places but they're a start. We could also put substantially higher taxes on homes purchased after the first that applies to both people and companies to prevent them from being used as investment opportunities. We could also not allow homes to be repurposed into short term rental units via services like Airbnb thus freeing up a shit ton of housing. There's plenty that we can do as long as we have the political will.
Re: (Score:2)
> We could also put substantially higher taxes on homes purchased after the first that applies to both people and companies to prevent them from being used as investment opportunities.
The problem is boomers run most rich countries now, an unintended consequence of having population growth dropping below replacement level. They either are, or are becoming, the major political force most everywhere that matters, politicians almost invariably bowing to their will. And they want their retirement plans working as intended. So, no, housing isn't going to come down, or if it does, it's at best going to be temporary.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
> Neither side of politics is going to or can do anything about this.
There's plenty that can be done. Not slamming our closest friendly trading partners with tariffs - such as all the lumber we import from Canada, or household appliances from Korea, or furniture from Vietnam and Thailand - would be a good start. Not indiscriminately rounding up the day laborers and skilled workers who do a lot of construction would be another. Not jeopardizing the Fed's independence, running trillion-dollar annual deficits to give tax breaks to the richester, jerking the economy around, and disrupting the US' standing in the world would cause long-term bond rates to lower, bringing mortgage costs down.
Is any of this going to happen? I dunno. I know that the folks presently in power are actively making things worse, though. Just throwing up ones hands and saying "nothing can be done" also isn't a solution.
Re: Wow (Score:2)
Thereâ(TM)s that and the fact that AI is acting as this generationâ(TM)s Industrial Revolution. If the government doesnâ(TM)t help manage this, then the cost to the nation will be bad. The problem is that itâ(TM)s current planning is only good for two tweats, while other nations try to consider a 10 year plan and manage accordingly.
Re: (Score:2)
> Thereâ(TM)s that and the fact that AI is acting as this generationâ(TM)s Industrial Revolution. If the government doesnâ(TM)t help manage this, then the cost to the nation will be bad. The problem is that itâ(TM)s current planning is only good for two tweats, while other nations try to consider a 10 year plan and manage accordingly.
I wonder if AI could fix slashdot's unicode support. It clearly can't convince users to stop posting unsupported characters, not even God could do that.
Re: (Score:2)
> not even God could do that.
The only fictional character worshiped here is the invisible hand.
Re: (Score:1)
> I'm so glad we didn't vote for the woman who laughed.
Same here..whew...
Think of just how much worse it could be now....