News: 0178980270

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Dozens of Scientists Find Errors in a New Energy Department Climate Report (npr.org)

(Tuesday September 02, 2025 @11:30PM (msmash) from the well-actually dept.)


A group of more than 85 scientists have issued a joint rebuttal to a recent U.S. Department of Energy report about climate change, [1]finding it full of errors and misrepresenting climate science . NPR:

> The group of climate scientists found several examples where the DOE authors cherry-picked or misrepresented climate science in the agency's report. For instance, in the DOE report the authors claim that rising carbon dioxide can be a "net benefit" to U.S. agriculture, neglecting to mention the negative impacts of more heat and climate-change fueled extreme weather events on crops.

>

> The DOE report also states that there is no evidence of more intense "meteorological" drought in the U.S. or globally, referring to droughts that involve low rainfall. But the dozens of climate scientists point out that this is misleading, because higher temperatures and more evaporation -- not just low rainfall -- can lead to and exacerbate droughts. They say that there are, in fact, many studies showing how climate change has exacerbated droughts.



[1] https://www.npr.org/2025/09/02/nx-s1-5521384/energy-report-scientists-climate-change



Gosh Really (Score:4)

by VonSkippy ( 892467 )

In the dumbing down of Amurika anyone is surprised at this? That's what happens when the stupid in control fire all the smart people.

Re: (Score:2)

by Anonymous Coward

At this point, if any other country attacks the US, we'll simply launch retaliatory ICBMs against ourselves. Given who has the launch codes.

Re: (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

> Which experts do we like today? Climate experts still good, but experts in DEI, mRNA, and Iran diplomacy are bad now right? A chart of whom I should trust today would be great, does MSNBC have one?

I'll simplify things for you. The people that orange jesus hired and appointed are nothing more than colossal ass kissers, yes men, and other deplorables. Let's start with RFK Jr's own words.

I don’t want to seem like I’m being evasive, but I don’t think people should be taking advice, medical advice, from me

That was at a goddamn congressional hearing. [1]https://www.theguardian.com/us... [theguardian.com]

The head of the Department of Education is the wife and former CEO of WWE wrestling. She's elderly and whe

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/14/rfk-jr-kennedy-senate-house-hearings

Re: (Score:3)

by gweihir ( 88907 )

Are you dumb? This is not only about direct deaths.

Who runs the DoE? (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

In case you wonder who now runs the DoE, it's Christopher Wright, former CEO of the country's second largest fracking company. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Wright

Kamacho's gang doesn't like criticism (Score:2)

by Uldis Segliņš ( 4468089 )

Crops need electrolytes! I wonder how long until they retaliate against the 85.

Re: Kamacho's gang doesn't like criticism (Score:2)

by zawarski ( 1381571 )

Don't worry, scrote. There are plenty of 'tards out there living really kick-ass lives.

Wow, the trumpistan kind and his ilk lie? (Score:2)

by Mr. Dollar Ton ( 5495648 )

Given the background of spotless honesty so far, I'm trully amazed. Let me sit down for a moment.

BTW, MAGATs, the "ultimatum" to putin has lapsed, and right now putin is executing another massive rocket attack against civil infrastructure in Ukraine.

What is the trumpistan king who made the ultimatum going to do?

Grab another TACO?

Republicans - Where factoids live (Score:2)

by felixrising ( 1135205 )

What a surprise factoids keep ending up in conservative government publications now.

It's not an error if you meant to write it (Score:2)

by Jeremi ( 14640 )

We should categorize these not as 'errors', but as deliberate lies in the service of the fossil fuel industry, who Trump openly promised would get whatever they wanted if they helped him win the election.

The section on the models is hilarious (Score:2)

by ishmaelflood ( 643277 )

P 123 It shows the good fit of the climate models to the period 1850-1990 ignoring the fact that that is the data the models are trained on. Great the models fit their training data. big fucking whoop.

Q: How many Pentium designers does it take to screw in a light bulb?
A: 1.99904274017, but that's close enough for non-technical people.