News: 0178833182

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Hollywood's Newest Formula For Success: Rereleasing Old Movies (nytimes.com)

(Saturday August 23, 2025 @11:34AM (BeauHD) from the what's-old-is-new-again dept.)


An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:

> There's an overwhelming sense of deja vu at multiplexes these days. In August alone, "Black Swan" (2010) is returning to theaters, along with the Tim Burton "Batman" movies from 1989 and 1992. Audiences will be able to revisit the oceanic terror of "Jaws" (1975), as well as the comic mystery (and multiple endings) of "Clue" (1985). Or they could groove to Prince's "Sign o' the Times" concert film from 1987. And it doesn't look like the rerelease trend is slowing down. In September, "The Breakfast Club" (1985) is returning, Pixar is bringing back "Toy Story" (1995), and "Apollo 13" (1995) is blasting off again. "Casper" (1995) will haunt screens for nearly the entire month of October, while "Avatar: The Way of Water" (2022) will run for about five days, teeing up the forthcoming "Avatar: Fire and Ash." And there are still more to come before the end of the year.

>

> Rereleases have long been part of the theatrical ecosystem. After all, "Star Wars" movies have been heading back to multiplexes routinely since 1981 -- before "Return of the Jedi" even debuted. But recently, studios have been [1]digging deeper into their archives for a variety of reasons -- only some of which have to do with nostalgia. "Black Swan," from Searchlight, which is now owned by Disney, took over around 200 IMAX screens to commemorate its 15th anniversary. Universal's specialty arm, Focus Features, rereleased both "Pride & Prejudice" (2005) and "Brokeback Mountain" (2005) earlier this year. "Pride & Prejudice" ultimately grossed more than $6 million domestically this time around, about 16 percent of its original U.S. box office haul.

>

> In total, Universal has 12 rereleases on its 2025 slate -- not including a partnership with another distribution company -- compared with just four in 2024 and two in 2023. "We very much pay a lot of attention to our repertory business," the studio's president of domestic theatrical distribution, Jim Orr, said by phone, explaining, "We just think it's not only great fun for audiences, but a great business to be in as well." Orr explained that the size of Universal's rerelease slate this year was "more coincidental" than anything else, with all the films hitting anniversaries in 2025. Still, there is a strong business motivation: The rereleases help studios and exhibitors pad out relatively thin slates. "The truth of the matter is studios don't have enough product right now to give theaters, so that's why you're seeing an influx of these nostalgia plays," said Jeff Bock, senior media analyst at Exhibitor Relations. He added, "It doesn't cost a lot for them to do an anniversary edition or a 4K edition."

There are several other reasons why Hollywood is rereleasing old movies, according to Orr. Rereleases are far cheaper to put out than launching a brand-new title. Studios also target films that already have strong, enduring audiences, "whether that's 'Pride & Prejudice,' with its meme-able depiction of yearning, or 'Casper,'" which he said had elicited 'decent' interest every year.

Then there's what Orr calls "opportunistic dating." "There might be a window where something goes thematically or holiday-wise, whatever kind of fits in, or there might be some more screens available in specific formats," he said. Specialty format releases like IMAX, Dolby, or 3D also help bring moviegoers to the theaters.



[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/22/movies/rereleases-black-swan-jaws-casper.html



Old movies (Score:3)

by phantomfive ( 622387 )

I've been waiting for them to re-release that old classic, [1]Iron Man 3 [wikipedia.org].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Man_3

Rerelease 'Life of Pi' 3D (Score:4, Insightful)

by Bruce66423 ( 1678196 )

Going to a rerelease only makes sense if the theatre experience will be better than what you'd enjoy at home. This is true of relatively few films, but the 3D version of 'Life of Pi' is an exception; the only film I've made an effort to see twice immediately at the cinema when it came out. My only other reattendance? '2001', which despite its age still works; the special effects still 'wow' after all these years.

Re:Rerelease 'Life of Pi' 3D (Score:4, Interesting)

by bickerdyke ( 670000 )

Yes, but it's in line with what cinemas said since the advent of TV: You're not paying for the movie only, but for the experience of a night out. And - for people who enjoy that experience - it makes sense to not only watch new movies (read: uninspired sequels or unnecessary remakes) but classics, too.

And with the time frame for exclusive theater distribution got shorter and shorter with discs and streaming services, you can't charge anything anymore for seeing a movie two weeks before it hits the streaming services. If you tried to fill that gap with more and more new movies, you would end up producing nothing but B-movies and worse.

And third: technology made it possible. A 35mm copy can cost as much as a car and has to be hauled around from cinema to cinema by big trucks. For digital movies, you put a few SSD into a UPS box and can ship it out for a night or two.

A cinema here has a surprise classic movie every other Thursday. Alternating a dubbed and original versions. Tickets are 6 bucks each, get a beer with it for 4 more. And the target audience is people who like movies more than annoying other viewers.

Re: (Score:2)

by madbrain ( 11432 )

Unfortunately, the experience has seriously degraded, with the advent of cell phones first, then smart phones. It is very hard for me to enjoy movies in public anymore.

One of those times was for a theatrical re-release of Ghostbusters. I think it was 35 years. My husband had never seen ot.

We went to a late weeknight show, and had an entire theater to ourselves.

Sadly, he didn't care for the movie.

Re: (Score:2)

by test321 ( 8891681 )

> if the theatre experience will be better than what you'd enjoy at home.

What what you don't go to theater or festivals to see old classics, or movies you had never heard of before?

Keep them coming (Score:3, Insightful)

by memory_register ( 6248354 )

With Marvel and Star Wars in the toilet, and Hollywood risk averse on new IP, I would much rather see a classic return than waste my time on a modern tale with no soul.

Re: (Score:3)

by phantomfive ( 622387 )

The main issue here is that [1]movie theaters have been begging for more movies to be produced [slashdot.org]. Instead of producing them, the production companies are experimenting with re-releases.

[1] https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/24/04/14/221247/struggling-movie-exhibitors-beg-studios-for-more-movies---and-not-just-blockbusters

old horror movies don't hold up (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

Calling for help with your cell phone breaks the plot of so many of these. Plus no getting stuck in the dark when your phone is a flashlight.

Re: (Score:2)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

They hold up fine. That's a super easy suspension of disbelief. I don't watch My Cousin Vinny and get bent out of shape that nowadays the judge could check Vinny's legal status without needing to contact anybody.

Re: (Score:2)

by PPH ( 736903 )

Will you be happy when they re-release Birth of a Nation?

Discounted ticket prices? (Score:2)

by kulaga ( 159303 )

With $0 production costs, there needs to be a massive ticket price discount. There are very few movies that I would pay $100 for my family of four to watch for the second time. Hell, there are very few new movies I would.

Thereby providing conclusive proof that... (Score:2)

by MpVpRb ( 1423381 )

...studio execs hate creativity

There are plenty of writers and directors with new ideas, but they are ignored as studios prefer reboots, remakes, retelling of old stories and now re-releasing old stuff. People love the old stuff because it was once new and creative

Re: (Score:2)

by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 )

Not even just that but audiences don't care so we take some of that blame. Studios are going to make what people show up to see

[1]Original Movies in 2025: Oops, All Flops! [youtube.com]

Sinners being the exception but original movies don't make as much money as rehashes and sequels these days.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0Jwv40MkiY

Dollar theater (Score:3)

by Dan East ( 318230 )

Yeah, this used to be called the dollar theater, like back in the 90s. You could watch older movies for 1/4th the price of a new release. There were entire theaters that just did these older release movies all the time.

repertory cinemas (Score:2)

by magnetar513 ( 1384317 )

There used to be repertory cinemas in many cities, ours closed down long ago, but it was great while it was open.

The greatest Virtue is to follow Tao and Tao alone.
The Tao is elusive and intangible.
Oh, it is intangible and elusive, and yet within is image.
Oh, it is elusive and intangible, and yet within is form.
Oh, it is dim and dark, and yet within is essence.
This essence is very real, and therein lies faith.
From the very beginning until now its name has never been forgotten.
Thus I perceive the creation.
How do I know the ways of creation?
Because of this.