News: 0178678988

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Margaret Boden, Philosopher of Artificial Intelligence, Dies At 88

(Friday August 15, 2025 @11:50AM (BeauHD) from the rest-in-peace dept.)


An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times:

> [1]Margaret Boden , a British philosopher and cognitive scientist who used the language of computers to explore the nature of thought and creativity, leading her to prescient insights about the possibilities and limitations of artificial intelligence, [2]died on July 18 in Brighton , England. She was 88. Her death, in a care home, was [3]announced by the University of Sussex, where in the early 1970s she helped establish what is now known as the [4]Center for Cognitive Science , bringing together psychologists, linguists, neuroscientists and philosophers to collaborate on studying the mind.

>

> Polymathic, erudite and a trailblazer in a field dominated by men, Professor Boden produced a number of books -- most notably " [5]The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms " (1990) and " [6]Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science " (2006) -- that helped shape the philosophical conversation about human and artificial intelligence for decades. "What's unique about Maggie is that she's a philosopher who has informed, inspired and shaped science," Blay Whitby, a philosopher and ethicist, said on the BBC radio show "The Life Scientific" in 2014. "It's important I emphasize that, because many modern scientists say that philosophers have got nothing to tell them, and they'd be advised to look at the work and life of Maggie Boden."

>

> Professor Boden was not adept at using computers. "I can't cope with the damn things," she once [7]said . "I have a Mac on my desk, and if anything goes wrong, it's an absolute nightmare." Nevertheless, she viewed computing as a way to help explain the mechanisms of human thought. To her, creativity wasn't divine or a result of eureka-like magic, but rather a process that could be modeled and even simulated by computers. "It's the computational concepts that help us to understand how it's possible for someone to come up with a new idea," Professor Boden said on "The Life Scientific." "Because, at first sight, it just seems completely impossible. God must have done it." Computer science, she went on, helps us "to understand what a generative system is, how it's possible to have a set of rules -- which may be a very, very short, briefly statable set of rules -- but which has the potential to generate infinitely many different structures." She identified three types of creativity -- combinational, exploratory and transformational -- by analyzing human and artificial intelligence.



[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Boden

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/14/science/margaret-boden-dead.html

[3] https://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/68608

[4] https://www.sussex.ac.uk/cogs/

[5] https://www.routledge.com/The-Creative-Mind-Myths-and-Mechanisms/Boden/p/book/9780415314534?srsltid=AfmBOoqEk3LPYjlc13tNj-do4fT0UEyr_9tEZOftzpCk85z57IE4L3NC

[6] https://global.oup.com/academic/product/mind-as-machine-9780199241446?cc=us&lang=en&

[7] https://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/42500



Too bad she didn't study (Score:1)

by 50000BTU_barbecue ( 588132 )

Life extension and anti-aging. Oh well, let's face the future with the couple of decades of useful life as our ancestors. Let's change everything except our life span, because that would be playing god...

Re: (Score:2)

by JoshuaZ ( 1134087 )

Lots of people are working on anti-aging research. It happens to be very hard. Biology is complicated. And most researchers research areas they personally find intellectually engaging, not necessarily areas that will do the most benefit anyhow.

Re: (Score:1)

by Anonymous Coward

You're trying to do the exact opposite - make a big deal out of something you're ignorant of.

But the only thing you're succeeding at is just insulting other people while still being ignorant yourself.

Congratulations, I guess.

Re: (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Oh the irony.

Re: (Score:2)

by Gilmoure ( 18428 )

Mental Spooge Quality

How Do We Really Know That AI Didn't Kill Her? (Score:2)

by classiclantern ( 2737961 )

I asked AI how to kill without leaving any trace behind. AI claimed to know, but was not allowed to tell a human.

For knighthood is not in the feats of war,
As for to fight in quarrel right or wrong,
But in a cause which truth cannot defer:
He ought himself for to make sure and strong,
Just to keep mixt with mercy among:
And no quarrel a knight ought to take
But for a truth, or for the common's sake.
-- Stephen Hawes