Reddit Wants To Be a Search Engine Now (theverge.com)
- Reference: 0178528468
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/07/31/2314200/reddit-wants-to-be-a-search-engine-now
- Source link: https://www.theverge.com/news/717095/reddit-q2-2025-earnings-search-engine
> Huffman says that "every week, hundreds of millions of people come to Reddit looking for advice, and we're turning more of that intent into active users of Reddit's native search." Reddit's core search has more than 70 million weekly active unique users -- Reddit overall averages 416.4 million weekly active unique users -- and [3]Reddit Answers , the platform's AI search tool that it launched in December, has 6 million weekly users, up from 1 million weekly users in the first quarter of this year. To continue to build out search, Reddit is "expanding Reddit Answers globally, integrating it more deeply into the core search experience, and making search a central feature across Reddit," Huffman says.
[1] https://www.theverge.com/news/717095/reddit-q2-2025-earnings-search-engine
[2] https://s203.q4cdn.com/380862485/files/doc_financials/2025/q2/Q2-25-Shareholder-Letter.pdf
[3] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/02/16/007234/despite-plans-for-ai-powered-search-reddits-stock-fell-14-this-week
Wants to be a shitty search engine? (Score:2)
Does reddit want to be a shitty search engine like wikipedia? Not that I don't get a whole lot of use out of wikipedia's search engine - in fact the vast majority of my searches go through wikipedia's engine and not google's. Suck it google, you don't get to spy on the vast majority of my searches. But this works because I feed wikipedia really softball searches. Send it the sort of search you regularly throw at google and it just barfs.
Wikipedia has not got anything remotely resembling Pagerank and there d
Re: (Score:2)
I remember that; there was a ton of hype around Google's internal search thing. I never saw it do anything better than basic full text search already present in SQL/Sharepoint/Exchange
The problem is software or hardware it is 'how' do you do it in a useful way. Page range for all the fancy academic writing about it boils down to don't actually do it, let humans do it, and pick up on the fact the content is interesting by how much linking to it there is/was.
One kind stupid but maybe not stupid approach I c
Re: (Score:2)
AltaVista gave me more accurate results than Google ever has, much less recently. But you did need to use reasonable logic, and "near" was an important addition.
Google was easier to use. That was their sole advantage.
Re: (Score:2)
Altavista was goddamn terrible. It wasnt just the ease of use, its that pagerank was *clearly* a superior algorithm than the weird fuzzy thing altavista did that sort of ensured you'd *maybe* find a useful result a couple of pages in if you where really careful with your search booleans. Google was ......... magic......... in the beginning.
Re: (Score:2)
PageRank doesn't really work on the Internet any more either - how often does anyone link to the things they're talking about? At best you might have some references at the bottom of a page, but most of the time, sites don't really have hyperlinks in the text. As such, a lot of the context for pagerank is lost, and all you have is "number of links", which is essentially link farming.
That said, Google do still have some notion of "reputation" for web sites - higher rep means higher results. I suspect that's
No way in hell..... (Score:1)
Enuf said !
Nothing Ventured (Score:2)
Is it the Apple Car of Gated Communities?
They kinda have to now (Score:5, Insightful)
The general progression toward using AI to directly answer search queries is going to be a huge problem for content producers, and I don't think the AI firms or Google appreciate the extent of the coming fight.
The argument used to be "Google provides you value by making your content discoverable." Now, AI companies consume content and provide their own takes on it without even referring people back to the original content. Result: no revenue at all from that activity for the content provider and a tiny loss from having to serve up the content for ingestion.
Long term, expect a growing market for paywall solutions for content providers and more companies like Reddit responding to Google, OpenAI and Anthropic as though they are competitors which they really are now.
On the flip side, this could lead to genuine innovation in fintech to make it painless to pay for content to support good providers which could create a lot of opportunity for the little guy in the content creation markets.
Re: (Score:2)
> On the flip side, this could lead to genuine innovation in fintech to make it painless to pay for content to support good providers which could create a lot of opportunity for the little guy in the content creation markets.
Anything that doesn't take the web back to millions of tiny pages made by random people then it sucks shit.
Re: (Score:2)
> The general progression toward using AI to directly answer search queries is going to be a huge problem for content producers, and I don't think the AI firms or Google appreciate the extent of the coming fight.
Yup, and it already is. Web searches are already useless, and AI is turning out to be eating into those web searches. Definitely an increasing problem.
Example - I use DDG for searches.
In a recent search for someone who drove off a bridge maybe 12 years ago because their GPS "told" them to, DDG (and Google since I tried them as well) returned page after page of the same results. News stories about a guy who drove off a bridge in 2023. Just from every news provider. Useless.
I knew it was a man and wife -
Re: (Score:2)
You had an answer...Are you sure it was correct?
Re: (Score:2)
I think the rise of AI, along with Reddit's often harsh and silly moderation decisions, is going to result in Reddit becoming irrelevant just like Stack Overflow.
Suicide parameter (Score:2)
If the goal of Reddit is the suicide of its residents, then yes, by all means, cripple Reddit with AI.
Ironic (Score:2)
That's ironic, because Google has apparently decided it doesn't want to be a search engine anymore.
Awesome monetization (Score:2)
Awesome monetization of half-baked opinions and less-well-baked Domino's pizza. JFC, how low the bar is set theses days.
And by pressing needs (Score:2)
He means money.
A search engine now makes money while almost inadvertently supplying useful search results.
See google results for the past year, shopping is now the top tier of results.
Sponsored results too. Gotta ad-incentivize those results.
Since COVID they have also convinced students that they are an operating system.
Used to be people gave up on a search 3 or 4 clicks deep. I believe that number now approaches 1.
Sorry, usually only this cynical *before* breakfast.
Just what we need... (Score:1)
...more shitty opinions on things we didn't search for.
They Can Want (Score:2)
They can want. That doesn't mean that it will happen.
COnsidering how famously atrocious Reddit's search function is, there is zero change of them being a serious search engine.
Google is being toppled by AI(ChatGPT/Copilot), but Reddit ranks as perhaps the worst search engine ever.
Fake fake fake (Score:2)
Considering that more than half of Reddit is either false or fake, this is going to end really well. I give it 5 years before the whole AI bullshit collapses into a "stupid people will believe anything" meme. This no different from all the execs who "cloudified" all their system to save money and got huge bonusus followed by all the new execs who are starting there in-sourcing project to take everything out of the "cloud" and back into personal datacenters, you guessed it, because the "cloud" doesn't work
Sigh. (Score:2)
I like Reddit.
I've literally never even clicked its AI thing in the app or on the website, and I only discovered it was even there a few days ago. My eyes literally gloss over anything that's not the stuff I use regularly (I don't care about stickers, coin, trends, or all the other nonsense either).
Stick to what you know. I don't frequent a barber shop because I hope one day it'll also sell me travel insurnace. I can't see myself using Reddit as a search engine unless it quite literally turns out to be t
Re: (Score:3)
> I like Reddit.
> I've literally never even clicked its AI thing in the app or on the website, and I only discovered it was even there a few days ago. My eyes literally gloss over anything that's not the stuff I use regularly (I don't care about stickers, coin, trends, or all the other nonsense either).
> Stick to what you know. I don't frequent a barber shop because I hope one day it'll also sell me travel insurnace. I can't see myself using Reddit as a search engine unless it quite literally turns out to be the
Still in search of a profitable (Score:2)
business model.
April 1st again? (Score:5, Informative)
Reddit's internal search... infamously bad.
It's more useful to use Google with the "site:" parameter than stay within Reddit to search.
Re: (Score:2)
It's great! I mean, the syntax is a little unusual in that it seems to start with the URL google.com and the protocol isn't http or https but "site:reddit.com"...other than that, the search is great!