News: 0178405886

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

House Passes Historic Crypto Bill Regulating Stablecoins (cnbc.com)

(Thursday July 17, 2025 @11:30PM (BeauHD) from the historic-legislation dept.)


The House [1]passed a bipartisan bill regulating stablecoins which now heads to President Trump's desk as part of his push to make the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world." Two other crypto-related bills -- one defining digital asset market structure and another banning a U.S. central bank digital currency -- were also approved by the House but face uncertain futures in the Senate amid partisan tensions and concerns over Trump's personal financial ties to crypto ventures. CNBC reports:

> The stablecoin bill, passed on a 308-122 vote, sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for the cryptocurrency, which is tied to a stable asset, often the U.S. dollar, to reduce price volatility. It passed the Senate with bipartisan support in June. "Around the world, payment systems are undergoing a revolution," said House Financial Services Chair French Hill of Arkansas as lawmakers debated the stablecoin legislation Thursday morning. Hill said the bill will "ensure American competitiveness and strong guardrails for our consumers."

>

> After Trump declared it "crypto week," the bills were stalled for more than a day amid disagreements among House Republicans about how to combine the legislation. In the end, GOP leaders put the three bills for a separate votes, leaving the fate of the other two bills unclear in the Senate. The internal dissent could foreshadow challenges ahead for the more sweeping crypto legislation that Trump has demanded and the industry has poured millions into advancing. The stablecoin measure is seen by lawmakers and the industry as a step toward adding legitimacy and consumer trust to a rapidly growing sector. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in June that the legislation could help that currency "grow into a $3.7 trillion market by the end of the decade."

>

> The bill outlines requirements for stablecoin issuers, including compliance with U.S. anti-money laundering and sanctions laws, and mandates that issuers hold reserves backing the cryptocurrency. Without such a framework, Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee in a statement warned, "consumers face risks like unstable reserves or unclear operations from stablecoin issuers." After the votes, House Republicans strongly urged the Senate to take up the second bill, which would create a new market structure for cryptocurrency.



[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/17/house-passes-crypto-industry-backed-market-structure-bill.html



Re: (Score:3)

by misnohmer ( 1636461 )

Of course they are if the government uses taxpayer's money to buy crypto. Unless of course they only buy this from purely voluntary taxes (or a collection), then sure, nobody is forced.

Re: Scamming made legal (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

Yes, and they're also forcing you to subsidize the royal Saud family and to support genocide and to destroy the rainforest, and ...

Re: (Score:3)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

Legalized ponzi schemes, it's what the people wanted. Well ... the people who think they are on the top of the Ponzi.

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

If legislation for crypto doesn't include prison time for advertising ICOs, NFTs, and stablecoins, then I'm not interested.

Re: Scamming made legal (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

How are stable coins a ponzi scheme? How do you profit?

Re: (Score:3)

by h33t l4x0r ( 4107715 )

Regulating stablecoins is the opposite of scamming. If you're against crypto rug-pulls this is good news.

Banning a U.S. central bank digital currency (Score:5, Insightful)

by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 )

> Two other crypto-related bills -- one defining digital asset market structure and another banning a U.S. central bank digital currency -- were also approved by the House ...

As with other things, not sure privatizing money is a good thing.

Re: Banning a U.S. central bank digital currency (Score:4, Insightful)

by commodore73 ( 967172 )

Didn't we already try that once with factory towns? And determine that it wasn't a good thing?

Re: Banning a U.S. central bank digital currency (Score:3)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

That's a captive market. The issues were related to that fact, not to the private money.

Most money has been private throughout history. All paper money was private during the first 60 years or so of the U.S. And that became an issue not because of excessive control as with company towns, but because it became onerous to deal with all the different currencies. It was essentially too much freedom.

Re: Banning a U.S. central bank digital currency (Score:2)

by commodore73 ( 967172 )

Insightful; there are certainly differences. I wonder what other considerations there might be to compare and contrast. My actual concern is the potential impact on the US dollar.

Re: (Score:3)

by TwistedGreen ( 80055 )

You load sixteen tons, what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in debt

Saint Peter, don't you call me, 'cause I can't go

I owe my soul to the company store

Crypto week, and yet ... (Score:3)

by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 )

> After Trump declared it "crypto week," ...

Still waiting on [1]Infrastructure Week [politicaldictionary.com] ...

[1] https://politicaldictionary.com/words/infrastructure-week/

Grift-maxxing (Score:3)

by TheStatsMan ( 1763322 )

How bout a health care bill

Re: (Score:2)

by ndsurvivor ( 891239 )

My guess is that as long as Trump gets full credit, and people call him daddy, then we may get health care.

Re: Grift-maxxing (Score:3)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

They did that already. Medicaid was cut. Their job here is done.

Re: (Score:2)

by linuxguy ( 98493 )

He has been promising for years, to replace Obamacare with something much better. With Republican majorities in the house, senate and supreme court, there appears to be no effort being made in this regard. All the effort is on grift.

Ya gotta hand it to him (Score:2)

by Big Hairy Gorilla ( 9839972 )

Control of the money supply.

"Gambling Don" is making a play for the role of central banker ... he's got a pretty good shot .. then control the supply as he prints Donny Dollars ... do they put your face on cryptocoins?

Then the USA can be ground central for criminal activity ... a lot like a casino actually.. might just work if he lives long enough. I guess the kids would fight over who gets the central bank, eh?

MAGA fans (Score:3)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Suddenly have nothing to say when this stuff comes up.

Stablecoin the Shell Game :o (Score:3)

by Mirnotoriety ( 10462951 )

Who audits these stablecoin companies and verify they have sufficient fiat currency or other asset to cover the value of the stablecoins. The whole crypto things sounds like a gigantic shell game.

Know whats way better than a dollar? (Score:2)

by hdyoung ( 5182939 )

A string of ones and zeros that a crypto bro totally promises is totally worth exactly the same as a dollar.

For criminals and people with an IQ less than 80, I mean.

drug, n:
A substance that, injected into a rat, produces a scientific paper.