News: 0178384016

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Young Americans Face Job Market Disconnect as Parents Offer Outdated Career Advice (axios.com)

(Tuesday July 15, 2025 @11:30PM (msmash) from the reality-check dept.)


Nearly half of young Americans [1]feel unprepared for future jobs as AI reshapes the workforce faster than career guidance can adapt, according to [2]a new study from the Schultz Family Foundation and HarrisX. The survey of thousands of workers aged 16-24, along with parents, counselors and employers, revealed differences between generations about job availability and requirements. While 71% of employers say sufficient opportunities exist, only 43% of young people agree.

Parents rely on outdated personal experiences when advising children, with 79% drawing from their own career paths despite 66% believing their children should pursue different directions. Employers require at least one year of experience for 77% of entry-level positions while offering internships for just 38% of roles.



[1] https://www.axios.com/2025/07/15/gen-z-job-market-ai-unemployment

[2] https://www.brokenmarketplace.org/



Most parents don't understand this but.. (Score:2)

by Idimmu Xul ( 204345 )

Do not raise your children the way [your] parents raised you, they were born for a different time.

or..

You cannot raise your children how your parents raised you, because they raised you for a world that no longer exists.

Re: (Score:2)

by TWX ( 665546 )

That's all well and good to say, but that neither addresses what actually changes, versus how some changes have proven harmful and should be avoided if possible even if they're common.

Re: (Score:2)

by Idimmu Xul ( 204345 )

what's changed is largely irrelevent to the context because guess what, if/when today's kids have kids, things will have changed again.

This is a systemic problem (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

It seems disingenuous to just tell the parents to raise their kids better when you have a systemic problem. Parents can only do so much.

Don't get me wrong I am all for not raising your kids the way you were raised. My parents were useless and insane respectively. And I was careful not to impart generational trauma as best I could, although I'm still pretty sure I ended up with a little bit passed over whether I liked it or not.

But we have solid studies it shows 70% of the middle class jobs in the la

Re: (Score:3)

by tchdab1 ( 164848 )

I went through higher ed in a family who had never got out of high school, so I had little guidance or useful experiences to draw on. I remember discussing studying Electrical Engineering with dad, who kept asking, "wouldn't you rather work with numbers?". As an example.

There are now families with more education but similar disconnect.

Re: (Score:2)

by wyHunter ( 4241347 )

Yes, sounds like we had similar backgrounds. I don't have kids so I dunno what I'd do if I did, but I really felt like 'how do I do this, exactly?' and I think it's only gotten harder over the years. The lunacy of requiring 1 year of experience for an entry level job is just that -- "Oh, get an internship!" I rather thought indentured servitude has not been legal for a long time, but here we are.

Re: Most parents don't understand this but.. (Score:2)

by macmurph ( 622189 )

Thatâ(TM)s something your parents would say! /s

Re: (Score:2)

by tchdab1 ( 164848 )

But props to you for knowing this.

I am getting real tired of the AI doom and gloom.. (Score:3, Insightful)

by TheStickBoy ( 246518 )

I am getting real tired of the AI doom and gloom articles, even if its true could Slashdot please branch out and diversify?

Re: (Score:2)

by Austerity Empowers ( 669817 )

This is what they're being paid to show.

Re:I am getting real tired of the AI doom and gloo (Score:5, Insightful)

by Temkin ( 112574 )

> I am getting real tired of the AI doom and gloom articles, even if its true could Slashdot please branch out and diversify?

Cmdr Taco and Cowboy Neal cashed out, they're long gone. What's replaced them seeks to influence you. Hence at least three "Ahhhh!!!! AI is taking all the jobs" and three "Ahhhh!!!! Climate Change!" stories a day, interspersed a few stories you actually might care about.

T

Re: (Score:2)

by leonbev ( 111395 )

They're better than the cryptocurrency cheerleading articles, anyway, which seems to be Slashdot's other favorite topic.

Re: (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

I'm really getting tired of the real world too. Doesn't make it go away.

I briefly was a history major before I realized it wasn't for me, so I took a few more history courses and read more books than most folks.

There was absolutely widespread technological unemployment during the two industrial revolutions. We don't like to talk about it. And it didn't just go away it lasted right up until the early 1900s where coincidentally we started two world wars.

Re: (Score:2)

by narcc ( 412956 )

In case you haven't noticed, there's not a lot of hope or optimism to be found anywhere at the moment. We're staring down a global recession, possible nuclear war, and watching the leader of the free world build concentration camps. If that wasn't enough, isolationist policies are creating a power vacuum that the most dangerous actors are best positioned to fill. Oh, and fascism and authoritarianism are making a comeback.

Maybe you can find a story about a police officer not shooting a puppy when respondi

Re: (Score:3)

by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 )

> In case you haven't noticed, there's not a lot of hope or optimism to be found anywhere at the moment. We're staring down a global recession, possible nuclear war, and watching the leader of the free world build concentration camps. If that wasn't enough, isolationist policies are creating a power vacuum that the most dangerous actors are best positioned to fill. Oh, and fascism and authoritarianism are making a comeback.

> Maybe you can find a story about a police officer not shooting a puppy when responding to a welfare check, but I doubt it.

How do you even keep on living? There has never ever been a worse time than this.

It's so damn funny except that if you believe it you are 100 percent correct. There is no hope for you. There is no need tor humanity to not just end itself.

That's an alternative wording of your post.

And yet, I raised my son in opposition to what I saw was going to happen. I refused to let them drug him into compliance. I raised him with the knowledge that he had a lot of potential, and that the self esteem they taugh

Re: (Score:2)

by xevioso ( 598654 )

You must be a white guy.

Go into the trades (Score:2, Informative)

by memory_register ( 6248354 )

All the boomers are retiring and the work is not going to be replaced by AI. Make $80,000 by age 20. Stop getting worthless degrees and build something real instead.

Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

by Sique ( 173459 )

Thank you for providing an example for the outdated career advice of parents.

Re:Go into the trades (Score:4, Insightful)

by nealric ( 3647765 )

You joke, but one thing AI is allowing is automating a lot of tasks that used to be performed by skilled tradespeople. For example, robots already do much of the welding work in manufacturing. AI will potentially allow robots to weld even for highly paid welding field work (such as oil and gas pipelines).

Residential plumbers, electricians, and HVAC people are still in-demand, but residential services businesses are increasingly getting rolled up by private equity and making it hard for individual tradespeople to compete. Obviously, you still need tradespeople to perform the tasks, but private equity "efficiency" will make sure they pay bottom dollar to most of the workers, with maybe a handful of certified people who are better paid to sign off on the work after it is done.

"Learn a trade" is just as empty headed as telling laid off coal miners to "learn to code."

Re: (Score:2)

by Random361 ( 6742804 )

A great example is medicine. Corporations have gobbled up the market such that it is absolutely impossible in many places for an individual doctor to have a practice. Hospitals are largely owned by huge holding corporations like Tenet. The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) is basically a guild system that extorts money from doctors to the tune of thousands of dollars a year per person. The AMA sends out fake bills to people's practices hoping that a secretary who is clueless will just pay it. Mal

Re: Go into the trades (Score:2)

by tpjunkie ( 911544 )

Itâ(TM)s not consolidation of practices under corporate/PE money thatâ(TM)s making it impossible to run a solo practice; that is the symptom of the insurance companies behavior which is making it harder to run a solo practice. They will no longer negotiate rate increases with physicians despite inflation and rising practice costs, which used to be a relatively common thing every few years. Now you get what they offer to pay. Take or leave it. At the same time prescribing medications imaging studie

Re: (Score:2)

by jythie ( 914043 )

Yeah, there seems to be this idea that people are not going into the trades due to some arrogance or ignorance or prejudice. .. but really, just like trucking, many of the industries have consolidated and the number of good jobs has been dropping like a stone, and employers are upset that people are not interested in the deals they are offering.

Re: (Score:2)

by CAIMLAS ( 41445 )

The only rational extension of this, then, is to get into that business.

Get experience welding/fabricating/cement work/construction, and figure out where that tech is going. Build a small nestegg as you rent and be intentionally poor.

Start a business doing what you now know, but automated - and ask your parents to help with collateral. Get investments and funding. Buy into a franchise making future-looking technology that can do the trade you now know.

The 3d printed structure equipment is one such vertical

Re: (Score:2)

by Austerity Empowers ( 669817 )

Established tradesmen are the worst enemy of new tradesmen. No one with options signs up to be abused.

Re: (Score:2)

by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 )

> Established tradesmen are the worst enemy of new tradesmen. No one with options signs up to be abused.

Sounds like you don't like being told what to do. I don't know your age, but I've seen a lot of that in young people. They bristle if someone tells them they are turning the screwdriver the wrong way. Same way in other fields.

Re: Go into the trades (Score:2)

by fluffernutter ( 1411889 )

I have seen many people's bodies wrecked by doing a trade. I have never really seen anyone make a lot of money. Just long days, often outdoors.

Re: (Score:2)

by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 )

> I have seen many people's bodies wrecked by doing a trade. I have never really seen anyone make a lot of money. Just long days, often outdoors.

I've seen ads for finish carpenters at 50 dollars per hour. And possibly you've never seen a master machinist's pay. Ours were well over 100 k. You don't work on million dollar plus pieces of metal that can be reduced to scrap if you make one tiny mistake and get paid minimum wage for it.

Once upon a time people didn't expect to start at the top. And they didn't think that tradespeople were Low-IQ dullards that couldn't get a college degree.

Re:Go into the trades (Score:4, Insightful)

by Waffle Iron ( 339739 )

Everyone pile into the trades just in time for the next cyclic construction industry bust.

Re: (Score:2)

by jythie ( 914043 )

A new expectation has been set for how much various labors are 'worth'. Do you really think companies are magically going to start paying more? They will just go back to complaining about how lazy poor people are for not wanting to work for them, until people get desperate enough to accept the immigrant wages.

Re: (Score:2)

by Ol Olsoc ( 1175323 )

> A new expectation has been set for how much various labors are 'worth'. Do you really think companies are magically going to start paying more? They will just go back to complaining about how lazy poor people are for not wanting to work for them, until people get desperate enough to accept the immigrant wages.

So they just won't make the things their companies need to make money.

You must not have heard of supply and demand. I have a skillset that is in really short supply. So I'm paid well. Would they pay less if they could? Duh! But they need what I do done, and pay me according to my worth. If as you claim, they only wanted to pay minimum wage, they'd be closing their doors.

Re: (Score:3)

by Sigma 7 ( 266129 )

And now there'll be a glut of workers in trade, who now have to find work, etc.

Yes, trade work is guaranteed to exist, but it also doesn't support the entire population trying to enter that field, in the same way everyone shouldn't become a doctor or some other field that could collapse due to too many workers.

> Make $80,000 by age 20.

This requires either full time work, and jobs will dry up, or making one's own business which requires paperwork and keeping track of money. This paperwork is handled by a "wort

Re: (Score:2)

by DrMrLordX ( 559371 )

Not absolutely true. There's going to be a lot of work for electricians (especially ones trained to handle large network installations) due to the boom in datacentre expansion. Aluminum welding is a specialized skill in hot demand. There are others.

Re: (Score:2)

by narcc ( 412956 )

What happens when the datacenter rush ends? Either becaue we have enough capacity or because the AI bubble bursts?

"Look at all the jobs building this one thing will create! Surely, those will last forever and just vanish at the end of the project!"

Think.

Re: Go into the trades (Score:2)

by fluffernutter ( 1411889 )

This year, but what about next year?

Re: (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Name a trade that pays $80k with two years experience. I suppose oil rig workers or underwater welding is in the trade category but those jobs pay a lot for a reason.

Re: (Score:3)

by jythie ( 914043 )

Trades where they get their parent's business and its existing customer list?

Re: (Score:2)

by gweihir ( 88907 )

Well, "getting worthless degrees" is indeed stupid. But there are degrees that are really not "worthless". Yes, I understand that you would not be able to get one of those...

Temp work FTW (Score:2)

by xevioso ( 598654 )

I have had three jobs in my career in tech start as a temp worker, and then I ended up getting hired full time. I was at my last job for ten years, after having started initially as a temp worker for three weeks. There's lots of good reasons to choose temp work rather than struggle doing the crazy interview process in the current environment.

As far as I know, that is still quite possible, and I would give that advice to my son if he were of working age. He's not, but in 15 years when he is, I'd probably

Re: (Score:2)

by TWX ( 665546 )

I've seen some temp jobs work out well, but I've seen others where it was not so good.

Temp-to-hire where the employer actually really does intend to hire-on, and uses the temp-process to get to know candidates before making offers is fine. It's actually not a bad idea if basically everyone is on the same page. Temp agency needs to be ready to move people around if various employers do or don't like candidates, and temp-employees need to understand that there could be periods of downtime, and might themsel

Re: (Score:2)

by xevioso ( 598654 )

Yes, but the thing about these situations is the temp worker can just leave. The key to being a good temp is getting hired by multiple temp agencies. You call in EVERY DAY to EACH AGENCY until you get a job. If you end up at one that is not working out for you, complete your assignment and move on to the next one. If it is a long term assignment, and you are being treated like shit, let your temp agent know that, and let them know you plan on moving on to the next one at the next opportunity. I was a

Re: (Score:2)

by kencurry ( 471519 )

Temp to hire is always an option. It helps the candidate with experience, and gives them some leverage when it comes to other job interviews. For the young, seeing how a company works from the inside and navigating politics is valuable. Always a great feeling to get a paycheck vs. being constantly broke.

You see a similar complaint all over the Internet (Score:2)

by King_TJ ( 85913 )

As a 50-something parent myself? I'm thinking:

1. You can't really expect to ask parents for "career advice" and then get upset they aren't giving you information you think is relevant to the current job market/hiring situation. All they really know is how it worked for them. If nothing else, that's useful information in and of itself, because it gives you a historical sense of how things were before they got to what you're dealing with today.

2. If you're trying to figure out how to get hired, you need to as

Re: You see a similar complaint all over the Inter (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

A lot of the advice is unsolicited. The parents are acting like the kids have something wrong with them because what worked for them isn't working for their kids.

Re: (Score:2)

by xevioso ( 598654 )

It's not a 20-somethings job to have the wisdom to understand their parents don't have accurate information about the job market, especially if the parents themselves are employed and have been through more interviews / hiring processes than the kids. Or rather, it's not reasonable to expect they will understand this. It takes a lot for a 20-something looking for work to have the insight to understand that their professional parents, who have raised them, and who are successful (presumably) and make a goo

Parents offering out-dated advice? (Score:2)

by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 )

That's not exactly a recent phenomenon...

(and I'm sure I'm guilty of it as well)

So the problem is some people (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

Are just going to be useless. The skills that they gravitate towards are going to be replaced by machines and software. And we are just not going to have any place for them in society.

In a competitive society where we all have to constantly justify our right to live this means we are going to have tens of millions of people who do not have the right to live.

We could of course convert from a competitive society to a cooperative one... I'll wait for the laughter to die down.

So eventually what's go

Re: (Score:3)

by alvinrod ( 889928 )

> In a competitive society where we all have to constantly justify our right to live this means we are going to have tens of millions of people who do not have the right to live.

>

> We could of course convert from a competitive society to a cooperative one... I'll wait for the laughter to die down.

I'm not interested in being a slave for people too lazy or disinterested in even trying to support themselves. The notion that everyone can have a job that they personally find fulfilling and life-affirming is naive idiocy. Find something to pay the bills and take up hobbies if work is not satisfying your personal desires.

No one is stopping you and other commie fools from starting your very own cooperative society. The rest of us only ask that you leave us out of it. We have no desire to subsidize your e

Re: (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

> I'm not interested in being a slave for people too lazy or disinterested in even trying to support themselves.

That's what you are now. They are called CEOs and politicians.

Re: (Score:3)

by jythie ( 914043 )

Ah, but they are rich, and for people who have invested their identity in the idea of meritocracy, that means they deserve such lives. So rather than being somewhere between leaches and status symbols, they are seen as the holy ones.

Re: (Score:2)

by jythie ( 914043 )

Not stopping? People have turned stopping such things into a holy war, and will stop people from doing so at any cost.

Re: (Score:2)

by serafean ( 4896143 )

> I'm not interested in being a slave for people too lazy or disinterested in even trying to support themselves. The notion that everyone can have a job that they personally find fulfilling and life-affirming is naive idiocy. Find something to pay the bills and take up hobbies if work is not satisfying your personal desires.

Pick up hobbies, when? 50-60 + hour work week (because that includes commute, if you're lucky), cooking, cleaning, shopping, have a family. Tell me when to do hobby? At 3 hours/week y

Re: (Score:2)

by nealric ( 3647765 )

I'm not necessarily worried about unemployment. Humans will always find something to do, even if it's not "productive" by current standards. Pre-industrial people would be puzzled by the work most 21st century people perform and most probably wouldn't call what we do "work."

Many people may not have any purpose in terms of physical production, but there is a lot of room for care work that doesn't require any real skills other than some basic human compassion. For example, daycares and nursing homes never hav

Re: (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

> Life is a competition.

Modern life as we know it is completely impossible without cooperation. Even the most trivial of finished goods require the input of hundreds or thousands of people. It is also be competitive, but it is inherently cooperative, and there's no reason not to make it moreso just to make the bootstrap pulling, boot licking crowd satisfied.

Re: (Score:2)

by jythie ( 914043 )

It is kinda ironic since the reality is that society can only support so many people like registrations_suck. In a macro sense, they are the useless ones that can only survive because we are a society wealthy enough to support them.

Re: So the problem is some people (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

Lick harder, I see some leather left on the wealthy's collective boots. Surely they will reward you richly!

Re: So the problem is some people (Score:2)

by fluffernutter ( 1411889 )

> The notion that able-bodied people should be able to just do whatever the fuck they want while being supported by everyone else is ridiculous.

You scream that at them while they are driving away with your stuff. Yes life is competitive but the people who win the competition say fuck laws and help themselves to your stuff by force. Unless that is the life you want to live, you want cooperation.

Self fulfilling prophecy (Score:5, Insightful)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

I had this discussion with my nephew. He was ranting about the way the whole world is skewed against his generation, and how there are no opportunities. I said, "I don't think you know that to be true."

After some discussion it was clear that he had been radicalized to this viewpoint not because he had really did his best and failed, but by the endless feedback loop online that told him he didn't need to try because he was doomed to fail.

I didn't have to go far for a counter example. His older brother is an electrical engineer and doing well.

My point was that letting the online community convince you it's hopeless makes the failure real, and it's not useful.

Re: (Score:3)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

If you tell me everybody in a whole generation is going to fail, I'll call you a liar. And if some are going to succeed, announcing failure in advance of trying should earn somebody no sympathy.

Easy mode? Hardly. Not going to sit here and compare life stories, but that's just not true. Every generation had its challenges.

Re: (Score:2)

by GonzoPhysicist ( 1231558 )

You've got to consider broad trends for topics like this. You'll never be able to describe "everybody in a whole generation" as succeeding or failing and you'll always be able to find individual cases of success and failure.

So compared to the past, are more young people struggling with their careers or are more comfortable in them?

And while a pessimistic attitude doesn't help, I don't think it's the driving factor as much as a response.

Re: (Score:3)

by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

Mistakes were made.

They call them baby boomers for a reason - they are the biggest generation, by cohort size. A lot of the policies that benefited them were made on the assumption that the next generation would be even bigger, and that the economy would keep growing proportionally, and the workers would share in that wealth.

None of that turned out to be true. There were fewer gen X, even fewer Millennials, and far fewer gen Z. Wages didn't keep up with GDP growth.

In the UK, there were about 14 people per r

Motte and bailey fallacy (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

You can't win the argument so you retreated to a easier argument. It's a variation on the straw man argument. You know damn well I never said everybody is going to fail.

What I said is that older generations had it easier than younger generations because of the world older generations created.

You wanna tried disputing literally any of the points I made? You're going to find they're all quite true. And I didn't even bring up climate change. The droughts caused from that have caused the price of beef t

Re: (Score:2)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

I did not retreat. I restated. What you see as a retreat is me refusing to own what you read into my post.

Re: (Score:2)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

"You wanna tried disputing literally any of the points I made?"

No. Because none of them contradict my post. Go back and reread the initial post. I did not offer an opinion on whether that was right or wrong. How badly do you read?

Re:Ok boomer (Score:5, Insightful)

by brunes69 ( 86786 )

#1 - Did you somehow entirely miss the part that the nephews older brother - in the same generation with the exact same upbringing - is doing fine?

#2 - Your statement is outright false. If you think the government paid 70% of your tuition 30 years ago - I have a bridge to sell you. It simply didn't work that way, ever. In fact, most people in the 90's and 00's worked their way through school.

Re: (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

> #1 - Did you somehow entirely miss the part that the nephews older brother - in the same generation with the exact same upbringing - is doing fine?

They don't have the exact same upbringing, in particular first and second siblings are typically treated differently in a number of ways. They also are not the same person, and different people are able to take advantage of different opportunities for multiple reasons — not all people have the preparation to take the same opportunities, and not all people will have the same opportunities handed to them. So no, you are factually incorrect, they did not have the exact same upbringing, and even if they d

You are falling for his trap (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

He's trying to avoid arguing any of the actual points that I raised about how younger generations have it harder factually. So he's trying to get you into a weeds argument over the differences between the two.

When it comes to old farts with bad ideas they can never actually argue their points so they try to change the subject. It's all they can do.

Re: (Score:2)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

Look, you're the one going out of the way to muddy the waters over what was a very simple premise. In your post summing me up you got everything wrong. I am not a boomer, I did not go to university, I bought my first property in 2008.

In your rush to contradict you read a mountain into the molehill. Good lord. At least own up to it.

Re: (Score:2)

by Himmy32 ( 650060 )

> In fact, most people in the 90's and 00's worked their way through school.

> most people in the 90's and 00's worked their way through school.

> One thing to note here is huge increase in the [1]

cost of higher education [usinflatio...ulator.com] relative to inflation starting late 70's and finally getting close to matching by 2015. So while government wasn't really subsidizing 70% as the OP claims, Baby boomers and Gen X did have a much easier time working to pay for their schooling than Millennials and Gen Z.

[1] https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/college-tuition-inflation-in-the-united-states/

Re: (Score:2)

by cmdr_klarg ( 629569 )

> If you think the government paid 70% of your tuition 30 years ago - I have a bridge to sell you. It simply didn't work that way, ever. In fact, most people in the 90's and 00's worked their way through school.

I got my BS in CompSci late 80's-early 90's, paid for mostly with Pell grants (there are advantages to having poor farmers for parents). The only loans I had was for the year I spent at the college dorms. The rest of the time I lived on the farm, so you could say that I was working my way through. I think I ended up with about $8K in loans.

My son got his BS working his way through college. He had 14K in loans at the end of that. He's going to grad school which is blowing his loan debt up big, but at the

Re: (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

Did you somehow not know what the fuck survival bias is?

Yes the entire human civilization has not completely collapsed and we aren't cracking our skulls open and eating the goo inside. Good for you.

I fucking hate this. I hate the way you guys like you act like just because somebody blundered into a decent life that luck doesn't exist. We have hard numbers that clearly show that everything is harder for the younger generations. That is just a fact and that is why you aren't addressing any of the poin

Re: Ok boomer (Score:2)

by brunes69 ( 86786 )

So what are you going to do about the problem?

Or are you just going to sit on your butt, whine and complain, using idiotic phrases like "OK boomer" to refer to Millenials and GenX?

Seconded (Score:2)

by JBMcB ( 73720 )

Gen X also. I paid my way through college by working. I didn't get any scholarships or financial aid. As for direct government funding, you wouldn't know it had been cut by how many buildings the university has built in the intervening 30 years. The campus is nearly unrecognizable. It has twice the staff in half again many new buildings, but enrollment has dropped about 10% since then. So, they're getting money from somewhere.

Re: (Score:2)

by Mononymous ( 6156676 )

> So, they're getting money from somewhere.

Yes, unsustainable student loans. People have been telling us this, and some of us haven't been listening.

Re: (Score:2)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

That's why I didn't say it like that. :) I didn't even bring up his brother to him. I mentioned it here, but not there.

While 71% of employers say (Score:1)

by Iamthecheese ( 1264298 )

When 71% of employers and 43% of young people agree there are enough jobs available for them, it exposes the official unemployment and economy numbers as a massive lie. Not even the people hiring believe it's a job seeker's market. And the stagnating to falling wages (vs inflation) tell the same story. Until we know what the numbers really are we won't be able to see the extent of the problem. The BLS and DOL need to STOP LYING so we can get our collective head around the situation we face here in the real

Walk right in and ask for an application (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

Go straight to their reception desk and ask for a job application. Employers will respect that you're serious about getting a job. Make sure you firmly shake hands, to show that you are excited about the opportunity.

That Boomer advice never actually worked for me. Not even 30 years ago.

I also never bothered to create a different cover letter on my résumé, despite numerous people telling me that's critical. I just listed all the programming languages I knew, and then filled 4 or 5 pages with descri

Re: (Score:2)

by TWX ( 665546 )

Funny, I got a good job in the late nineties doing just that. I was cold-calling and I got hired onto the quality assurance team for a specialized software product. Unfortunately despite the company not being a dotcom they were in investment-building mode and the investor got cold feet so they went under anyway, but it was a good job and the people who hired me did so based on or technical conversations when I cold-called.

My current job I got by having experience with this team when I was at a different e

Re: (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Grandpa, its 2025. That was three decades ago.

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

All my best jobs I got because I knew someone.

Re: (Score:2)

by cmdr_klarg ( 629569 )

Same here. First tech job I got was because one of the bosses was good friends with one of Dad's neighbors. Second (and current) job was due to having worked with a current employee (at the time).

Re: Walk right in and ask for an application (Score:2)

by fluffernutter ( 1411889 )

There are companies with receptionists still?

Re: (Score:2)

by Hasaf ( 3744357 )

Funny, it worked for me once. Be aware that it was in the 80s and it has never worked since.

A company I knew of was doing a free pizza, beer and big screen sports Saturday. I didn't work there, but I worked in the industry.

I showed up in sandals, a Hawaiian shirt (long before the political thing with Hawaiian shirts), and shorts. I hadn't been told that it was also a recruiting event.

Apparently, they loved the "what you see is what you get" that I was exuding. They offered a big pay jump and a bunch

I told my kids all along to ignore career advice (Score:2)

by ihadafivedigituid ( 8391795 )

The main advice I have given to my kids, who are now 17 and nearly 20, is to:

- Learn things other people don't, so they don't have to compete with the masses quite so much.

- Have integrity and a good work ethic.

- Seek balance between work and recreation: they feed each other.

- Ignore well-meaning elders who tell them dumb shit like "do whatever it takes, including taking out student loans, to get a degree" (their mother and everyone else including school counselors), or who try to direct them into previ

Re: (Score:2)

by TWX ( 665546 )

The college degree loan thing was already becoming a problem when I was an undergrad over 20 years ago. It was fine when one might be borrowing $5000 per year as even entry-level college grad jobs that actually used degrees paid enough to make repayment of those loans doable, but the trouble was that far too many truly entry-level jobs started preferring college degrees when they didn't really contribute, so more and more demand for college degrees among people drove up prices for the limited seats. Which

Re: (Score:2)

by xevioso ( 598654 )

I think part of this is garbage advice.

If you don't have a degree, in many areas you will simply be passed over, regardless of how qualified you are otherwise.

AI is now actively used by corporations to weed out people who don't have those keywords on their resume. "B.A." and "M.A." are still selling points, and there's tons of statistics that show that people with degrees earn more, on average over time, than people who don't. That is still true today, and it is still true REGARDLESS of the cost of the deg

Re: (Score:2)

by ihadafivedigituid ( 8391795 )

You'll get passed over by companies who you don't want to work for anyway. Maybe you haven't been paying attention, but a lot of big companies--especially in tech--have stopped caring about degrees because they found them to have little predictive value.

I had a pretty great career doing all kinds of things, and I was a college dropout (full ride academic scholarship in the 80s, never took on any debt). I never had any need for a résumé and have had precisely one real interview in the past 30+ y

As a 50-something parent of a recent grad (Score:2)

by esme ( 17526 )

Of course people just starting their careers shouldn't ask their parents for career advice — it's very unlikely they have relevant, current knowledge and much more likely they'll draw from 20+ year old info that worked for them.

That said, parents are great for doing a "smell test" on an email, a resume, on an outfit, or on anything really. Hiring managers are likely to be closer to parents' age, so it's good to get feedback. Parents are also going to have much stronger professional networks that can h

Just one word: Plastics (Score:2)

by JoeyRox ( 2711699 )

There's a great future in PFAS's.

Somewhat regional issue (Score:4, Funny)

by DeplorableCodeMonkey ( 4828467 )

> "Just walk in, find the manager, shake his hand and give him your resume

Working in the DC region, Boomers don't give out that advice.

Mainly because it's a good way to get your kid arrested or killed in a hail of gunfire depending on the security level of the building.

Re: (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

It's bullshit advice in general anyway. My dad thought he was friends with some guy who was an exec who worked for Diversey-Lever (initials J.L.) and he gave me "his" number to call to allegedly get an interview. So I called up about it and got a receptionist who I couldn't get past, and never got a call back. People like that don't have friends, just people they can use, and they have people in between to protect them from people who think they are their friends.

Re: Somewhat regional issue (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

If he wanted to help me with that he could have made the phone call, which either also would not have helped or would have done. He also didn't offer to call when I told him what happened, he acted like it was my fault.

Yeah I'm aware he was a shit father but there's lots of those

Statistically Infuriating. (Score:5, Insightful)

by nightflameauto ( 6607976 )

> Employers require at least one year of experience for 77% of entry-level positions while offering internships for just 38% of roles.

This strikes me as almost as infuriating as the old, "We require twenty years experience in this field that has only existed for three years," thing we used to run into.

Of course it's out of date... (Score:2)

by nealric ( 3647765 )

Nobody should be shocked that parents are advising their children based on what worked (or didn't for them). All you can do as a parent is try to provide the benefit of experience.

However, there is one thing that I doubt will ever change: who you know matters quite a bit. Humans are fundamentally social animals, and someone who known to the organization doing the hiring and is perceived as "one of us" is always going to have a leg up over an anonymous resume. This tends to benefit the children of those who

Not Axios again (Score:2)

by richieb ( 3277 )

They just publish hype fed to the by CEOs of Anthropic and the like, who have slop to sell.

Why not interview Emily Bender and review "The AI Con"?

I let my kid decide on his own (Score:2)

by hambone142 ( 2551854 )

All I mentioned was to study an area that would provide job opportunities. I advised against getting a useless "fluff degrees".

He went into Mechanical Engineering and is doing just fine. It was his choice.

So (Score:2)

by The-Ixian ( 168184 )

"Get off your ass and get a job" is no longer useful advice? /s

Learned helplessness (Score:4, Insightful)

by RobinH ( 124750 )

I think what we're seeing is called "learned helplessness". They try, for all of 3 minutes, and don't see immediate improvement in their lives, and give up. We're conditioning people to expect immediate feedback. But all progress takes a long time. You have to stick with it. As someone once said to me, "if you want to dig a big hole, you need to stand in one place for a while." Also, the phone can be a useful tool, but it doesn't have the answers you need. Real people doing work out in the real world are the people you need to talk to, and the ones getting stuff done are making a living doing it, and don't need to post all their secrets online to get clicks. Work for someone who knows what they're doing, pay attention, and ask them some questions during the slow times when they take a break.

Timing is critical (Score:2)

by larryjoe ( 135075 )

Timing is important, and not just across generations but even across a few years. Someone who graduates during a recession or a period of scarce job openings will have to utilize different strategies than someone who graduates during boom times. Unfortunately sometimes those disadvantages carry across an entire lifetime.

I know people who graduated in 1993 (two years after the recession officially ended) who struggled to find a job. Meanwhile, two to three years later, graduates had multiple job offers du

This just in (Score:2)

by cascadingstylesheet ( 140919 )

"Young Americans blame their parents for all problems, including now the very existence of time itself."

Kids are all different (Score:2)

by kencurry ( 471519 )

I raised four. What worked for some didn't work for others. Some need yelling at, others need encouragement. You are doing your best, all the while confused by the BS, same as they are.

Oh, and this is another kernel in that great and venerable "BugFree(tm)"
series of kernels. So be not afraid of bugs, but go out in the streets
and deliver this message of joy to the masses.
-- Linus, in the announcement for 1.3.27