News: 0178273346

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

'Stop Killing Games' Consumer Movement Hits Major Milestones (gamingonlinux.com)

(Thursday July 03, 2025 @11:30PM (BeauHD) from the we-love-to-see-it dept.)


The " [1]Stop Killing Games " movement, led by YouTuber [2]Accursed Farms , has gained serious momentum as it [3]pushes back against the practice of game publishers shutting down access to titles consumers have paid for . Recent milestones include a UK petition surpassing 100K signatures and an EU initiative nearing its 1 million goal. GamingOnLinux reports:

> In the UK, the [4]newer petition has flown past the 100K signatures (126,066 at time of writing) needed for it to be considered for a debate in Parliament. That doesn't mean it will happen, just that it now needs to be considered by the UK government to potentially have it mentioned. A good step though, with signatures still flowing in until July 14th, showing there's demand for change.

>

> On the [5]EU side , things are also going well there now too. Against the needed 1 million signatures, it's now hit 977,864 (at time of writing). According to the official Accursed Farms X account, they've had [6]reports of "non-citizens spoofing signatures on the EU initiative" so it may be a little inflated.



[1] https://www.stopkillinggames.com/

[2] https://www.youtube.com/@Accursed_Farms

[3] https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/07/stop-killing-games-consumer-movement-hits-some-major-milestones/

[4] https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/702074/

[5] https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home

[6] https://x.com/accursedfarms/status/1940499343137706437



Re:And nothing of value was lost (Score:4, Informative)

by Jeremi ( 14640 )

I think they expected that since they had paid to purchase the game, they would be able to play that game for as long as they cared to, i.e. same as the deal you get when you purchase a book or a DVD.

You can argue that they were wrong to expect that, but that's the usual way of thinking about items that you buy, so that's what people (who haven't yet thought through the implications of software shrink-wrap licensing agreements) naturally expect.

If being able to play the game perpetually isn't a viable business model, then perhaps the publisher should be required to specify up-front how long (at minimum) they will guarantee purchasers access to the game; that way nobody will be surprised when their access goes away, because they understood the time-limit on what they were purchasing before they made the purchase.

Re: And nothing of value was lost (Score:4, Insightful)

by mhajicek ( 1582795 )

Or it could be required that when the publisher shuts down their servers they release the software necessary for others to host games, and allow them to do so without risk of lawsuit.

Re: And nothing of value was lost (Score:1)

by easyTree ( 1042254 )

Sounds good to me. Someone will chime-in, as usual, that:

* Non-transferable third party licenses

* Reduction of possibility of future exclusive exploitation of their re-usable IP (game engine, assets, game mechanics etc) thus giving competitors a leg-up

Still, this is not core to the issue that customers expect persistent use from the exchange.

Re: (Score:2)

by ThumpBzztZoom ( 6976422 )

Ford is required by law to manufacture enough spare parts for 10 years after they stop making the car. This is a much, much closer analogy to the suggested release of the compiled software so local servers can play the game after it is discontinued.

What you said is analogous to the software company releasing the source code and all graphics and sounds used to make the game once it is discontinued. While that would be nice, it's not what is being discussed here.

Re: (Score:2)

by BoogieChile ( 517082 )

Not equivalent. Equivalent would be when Ford decide to stop selling the Mustang and in all the Mustangs they've ever sold, the gas cap suddenly welds itself shut.

Re: And nothing of value was lost (Score:2)

by easyTree ( 1042254 )

I'd secretly hoped for a combination of the Spanish Inquisition, Alien Invasion and The Robocalype. Still waiting...

Thanks Pirate Software (Score:2)

by BrightCandle ( 636365 )

Thanks to Thor of Pirate Software opposing the movement the petitions got shared and talked about a lot more and will now hopefully pass the needed amount.

A few thousand more needed until 31 July (Score:2)

by test321 ( 8891681 )

For the petition to be valid, they still need (at this time): 2677 signatories from Malta, 2487 from Cyprus, 690 from Bulgaria, 7 from Slovenia.

Not feasible anymore (Score:2)

by devslash0 ( 4203435 )

Because virtually every game these days includes an online component, they'd need to start making offline games again, and we're well beyond the point in history when anyone would even remotely consider that anymore.

Re: (Score:3)

by Chris Mattern ( 191822 )

Indie game companies make and sell new offline games every day.

And online games can have their server code released when the publisher's servers shut down. I'm not even going to insist that it be provided for free. Doesn't guarantee that the game will keep going but it at least makes it possible.

No (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

*signed, the American corporations.

Ps, you just gave us 5 trillion dollars out of your pockets because half of you were freaking out over moral panics and the other half don't know basic economics, do you think we're going to let you have video games?

Re: (Score:2)

by Shane A Leslie ( 923938 )

They literally said 'girl with a big meaty cock'. He is acknowledging that although they have a big meaty cock that are, in fact, a girl. That is not transphobic, that is trans acceptance.

Meaningless (Score:2)

by djp2204 ( 713741 )

Unless these folks stop spending money on cloud dependent games that can be shutdown, the shutdowns will never end. Sign all the petitions you want. Until you put your money where your mouth is, it will not stop. Simply because itâ(TM)s profitable

Re: Meaningless (Score:1)

by easyTree ( 1042254 )

Tru dat.

Re: (Score:1)

by registrations_suck ( 1075251 )

This is the answer right here.

STOP BUYING SHITWARE!

If buying something means you don't own it... (Score:1)

by Shakes Fist ( 10502847 )

If you don't own what you're buying then pirating it isn't stealing. There's quite a few games I've bought that I've ended up downloading a cracked version so I can run it without connecting to the internet. Like a downloaded movie doesn't have the unskippable warnings and notices a DVD forces you to watch every bloody time.

Re: If buying something means you don't own it... (Score:2)

by easyTree ( 1042254 )

Yep, it's almost as if there should be a requirement for a 'fair usage policy' term in every contract or more generally that contracts which formalise an imbalance of power should become a thing of the past - if only morality could keep pace with the development of mobile phone tech.

Perhaps if there were some way to package morality with profit rather than the current situation where morality seems to be an inconvenient and optional impediment to profit.

Might not be suitable for persons suffering from weak hearts.