AI Note Takers Are Increasingly Outnumbering Humans in Workplace Video Calls (msn.com)
- Reference: 0178257186
- News link: https://slashdot.org/story/25/07/02/194224/ai-note-takers-are-increasingly-outnumbering-humans-in-workplace-video-calls
- Source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/no-one-likes-meetings-they-re-sending-their-ai-note-takers-instead/ar-AA1HP5O5
Major platforms including Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Google Meet now offer built-in note-taking features that record, transcribe and summarize meetings for invited participants who don't attend. The technology operates under varying legal frameworks, with most states requiring only single-party consent for recording while California, Florida, and Pennsylvania mandate all-party approval.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/no-one-likes-meetings-they-re-sending-their-ai-note-takers-instead/ar-AA1HP5O5
useless meetings (Score:5, Insightful)
If all you need to do at a meeting is take notes then you don't need to be in the meeting, it could have been an email.
You missed the point of a meeting (Score:1)
It's there so when people are blowing you off you can inconvenience them until they give you what you want from them.
Apart from that you have meetings that exist to keep people employed. And yeah all those people are going to lose their jobs soon in a huge wave of productivity enhancements.
Of course you're not going to see a dime of any of that money in the form of lower prices because companies don't lower prices anymore. Why would they? They have little or no competition.
Meanwhile hundreds of
This meeting would be better as an email (Score:5, Insightful)
Basically, AI note takers allow all the folks who aren't really needed at the meeting to just get the email summary. What this means is that A. none of them should have been asked to go to the meeting in the first place, and B. the meeting probably should have been an email.
Meetings tend to be useful for the person calling the meeting. The number of meetings that were genuinely useful for me as an attendee... over the course of my entire career, I can count them on one hand, as long as I use binary. 99% of time spent in meetings is not useful. And even in meetings that are genuinely important and useful, half the time is usually not useful.
More emails, fewer meetings. We had it right during the pandemic. That's why productivity improved so much.
Real Genius (Score:5, Funny)
I'm having flashbacks to that sequence in Real Genius (the 1980s movie with Val Kilmer) where over time, tape recorders have replaced not only all the students in a lecture hall (except for Mitch), but also the professor.
Re: (Score:2)
Came to say the same! Here's the scene: [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB1X4o-MV6o
Converting "should have been an email" to email (Score:2)
Well, it was all bullshit anyways, so I guess AI is a good fit.
Outnumbering? (Score:2)
Why would you need more than on AI note-taker? That's all you can do in MS Teams AFAIK
Bots having meetings with bots (Score:1)
... [1]how perverse! [youtube.com]
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bHOLJbWF4c
Absolutely (Score:2)
This is one thing that I'll absolutely use AI for- it's often very good at summing up meeting notes and all the drek that goes along with it- dropped files, links, references to other projects, etc etc.
It gives me back at least an hour a day, an hour of the most tedious, mind-numbing work that I would have to do. So yeah, for this use case I'm all in.
Inviting spies into your company's discussions (Score:2)
These AI note takers are produced by all kinds of random companies with no track record, no history. Every note they take, they have on their own internal systems, and can sell it to whoever they want. So if you want to know what your competition is up to, reach out to some of these note-taker AI companies, I have no doubt they would be happy to sell you whatever they have on your competition!
As time goes on... (Score:2)
AI will cost more and more. And also, more and more folk will be less and less engaged in the world that they're supposed to be a participant in. A recipe for disaster imho.
AI note takers will modify the notes (Score:2)
You'll notice the extra action items assigned to you when the notes get published,
Increasingly? (Score:3)
My multi-vendor Zoom and Teams meetings transitioned to AI note takers a while ago- completely.
I don't know how well it works, but at least in my professional environment, working with several very large networking equipment vendors, municipalities, and construction contractors, the replacement is total.
Re: (Score:2)
From a transcription standpoint, it works fine, if sometimes a bit off due to pronunciation issues. From an actual useful notetaking exercise, it's pretty bad. I took an hour kickoff meeting transcription and it pumped out about 2 single lined pages of "summary." My handwritten notes, excluding the attendees, filled up 1.5 pages on 8" x 5" notepad. Skimming the AI summary showed a few false positives on action items. In the end, I usually end up typing my handwritten notes up and sending out an email. It wo