News: 0178247690

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Bezos-Backed Methane Tracking Satellite Is Lost In Space (reuters.com)

(Wednesday July 02, 2025 @03:00AM (BeauHD) from the emission-impossible dept.)


MethaneSAT, an $88 million satellite backed by Jeff Bezos and led by the Environmental Defense Fund to track global methane emissions, [1]has been lost in space after going off course and losing power over Norway. "We're seeing this as a setback, not a failure," Amy Middleton, senior vice president at EDF, told Reuters. "We've made so much progress and so much has been learned that if we hadn't taken this risk, we wouldn't have any of these learnings." Reuters reports:

> The launch of MethaneSAT [2]in March 2024 was a milestone in a years-long campaign by EDF to hold accountable the more than 120 countries that in 2021 pledged to curb their methane emissions. It also sought to help enforce a further promise from 50 oil and gas companies made at the Dubai COP28 climate summit in December 2023 to eliminate methane and routine gas flaring. [...] While MethaneSAT was not the only project to publish satellite data on methane emissions, its backers said it provided more detail on emissions sources and it partnered with Google to create a publicly-available global map of emissions.

>

> EDF reported the lost satellite to federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. Space Force on Tuesday, it said. Building and launching the satellite cost $88 million, according to the EDF. The organization had received a $100 million grant from the Bezos Earth Fund in 2020 and got other major financial support from Arnold Ventures, the Robertson Foundation and the TED Audacious Project and EDF donors. The project was also partnered with the New Zealand Space Agency. EDF said it had insurance to cover the loss and its engineers were investigating what had happened.

>

> The organization said it would continue to use its resources, including aircraft with methane-detecting spectrometers, to look for methane leaks. It also said it was too early to say whether it would seek to launch another satellite but believed MethaneSAT proved that a highly sensitive instrument "could see total methane emissions, even at low levels, over wide areas."



[1] https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/bezos-backed-methane-tracking-satellite-is-lost-space-2025-07-01/

[2] https://news.slashdot.org/story/24/03/06/2034247/satellite-to-name-and-shame-worst-oil-and-gas-methane-polluters



Danger, Will Robinson! (Score:2)

by DrMrLordX ( 559371 )

[1]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=... [youtube.com]

[1] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RG0ochx16Dg

If Trump can't see the climate change science... (Score:2, Flamebait)

by greytree ( 7124971 )

If Trump can't see the climate change science ( because he shut it down ) then that's enough proof to him that the climate isn't fucked.

Shame on anyone supporting Trump who understands what is happening but is still helping him cause this disaster.

How do those people sleep at night ?

It's time to call them out.

Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

by gtall ( 79522 )

TDS? The ability to believe la Presidenta has nothing to do with it. Bezos is fairly far up la Presidenta's ass. It was launched in March, 2024. That was before Bezos decided he could horn in on whatever bullshit la Presidenta was selling. I doubt he gave an order blow it off course, but I'm willing to bet it won't bother him since now he can report the good news to his minder.

la Presidenta is above causing his regime's military to screw with the satellite in the same way a brick is above the Sargasso Sea (

Re:If Trump can't see the climate change science.. (Score:5, Insightful)

by thegarbz ( 1787294 )

> You blaming Trump for a broken satellite? The TDS is strong with this one.

One thing that is fun with Trump supporters is making an obviously facetious comment and then watching them take it literally. It reminds the world how they became Trump supporters in the first place. Go back to Fox News.

Re: (Score:2)

by VaccinesCauseAdults ( 7114361 )

I hate Trump as much as the next guy, and have a pretty keen sense of humour and sarcasm. But to be fair, greytree’s post seemed like a genuine rant rather than a facetious parody.

Learnings? (Score:2)

by Viol8 ( 599362 )

"we wouldn't have any of these learnings."

If their engineering is as bad is this woman's grammar then no surprise the craft crashed.

For the EU it's not just a promise, they have to (Score:2)

by Samare ( 2779329 )

"The new regulation obliges the fossil gas, oil and coal industry in Europe to measure, monitor, report and verify their methane emissions according to the highest monitoring standards, and to take action to reduce them." [1]https://energy.ec.europa.eu/ne... [europa.eu]

By the way, "When using fossil gas for electricity generation, lifecycle methane emissions must not exceed 3% of delivered volumes, because in climate terms, it would then be better to use coal for electricity generation." [2]https://energy.ec.europa.eu/to... [europa.eu]

[1] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/news/new-eu-methane-regulation-reduce-harmful-emissions-fossil-fuels-europe-and-abroad-2024-05-27_en

[2] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/carbon-management-and-fossil-fuels/methane-emissions_en

Occam's eraser:
The philosophical principle that even the simplest
solution is bound to have something wrong with it.