IBM Says It's Cracked Quantum Error Correction (ieee.org)
(Friday June 13, 2025 @11:30PM (BeauHD)
from the one-step-closer dept.)
- Reference: 0178042103
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/06/13/218205/ibm-says-its-cracked-quantum-error-correction
- Source link: https://spectrum.ieee.org/ibm-quantum-error-correction-starling
Edd Gent reporting for IEEE Spectrum:
> IBM has [1]unveiled a new quantum computing architecture it says will [2]slash the number of qubits required for error correction . The advance will underpin its goal of building a large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer, called Starling, that will be available to customers by 2029. Because of the inherent unreliability of the qubits (the quantum equivalent of bits) that quantum computers are built from, error correction will be crucial for building reliable, large-scale devices. Error-correction approaches spread each unit of information across many physical qubits to create "logical qubits." This provides redundancy against errors in individual physical qubits.
>
> One of the most popular approaches is known as a surface code, which requires roughly 1,000 physical qubits to make up one logical qubit. This was the approach IBM focused on initially, but the company eventually realized that creating the hardware to support it was an "engineering pipe dream," Jay Gambetta, the vice president of IBM Quantum, said in a press briefing. Around 2019, the company began to investigate alternatives. In a paper published in Nature last year, IBM researchers outlined a new error-correction scheme called quantum low-density parity check (qLDPC) codes that would require roughly one-tenth of the number of qubits that surface codes need. Now, the company has unveiled a new quantum-computing architecture that can realize this new approach.
"We've cracked the code to quantum error correction and it's our plan to build the first large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer," said Gambetta, who is also an IBM Fellow. "We feel confident it is now a question of engineering to build these machines, rather than science."
[1] https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/large-scale-ftqc
[2] https://spectrum.ieee.org/ibm-quantum-error-correction-starling
> IBM has [1]unveiled a new quantum computing architecture it says will [2]slash the number of qubits required for error correction . The advance will underpin its goal of building a large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer, called Starling, that will be available to customers by 2029. Because of the inherent unreliability of the qubits (the quantum equivalent of bits) that quantum computers are built from, error correction will be crucial for building reliable, large-scale devices. Error-correction approaches spread each unit of information across many physical qubits to create "logical qubits." This provides redundancy against errors in individual physical qubits.
>
> One of the most popular approaches is known as a surface code, which requires roughly 1,000 physical qubits to make up one logical qubit. This was the approach IBM focused on initially, but the company eventually realized that creating the hardware to support it was an "engineering pipe dream," Jay Gambetta, the vice president of IBM Quantum, said in a press briefing. Around 2019, the company began to investigate alternatives. In a paper published in Nature last year, IBM researchers outlined a new error-correction scheme called quantum low-density parity check (qLDPC) codes that would require roughly one-tenth of the number of qubits that surface codes need. Now, the company has unveiled a new quantum-computing architecture that can realize this new approach.
"We've cracked the code to quantum error correction and it's our plan to build the first large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer," said Gambetta, who is also an IBM Fellow. "We feel confident it is now a question of engineering to build these machines, rather than science."
[1] https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/large-scale-ftqc
[2] https://spectrum.ieee.org/ibm-quantum-error-correction-starling
Total number of qbits (Score:2)
by phantomfive ( 622387 )
They're going to have a chip with 200 qbits. If they succeed, that's something. Not a lot, but it's something.
Still does not matter (Score:2)
by gweihir ( 88907 )
They are so extremely far from any actually useful QC, that they might be ancient greeks talking about making a smartphone. Yes, there is progress. But is the goal in sight? No.
Re: (Score:2)
by ClickOnThis ( 137803 )
I like progress. I don't like exaggerated claims from said progress. But let's not diss progress just because the latter happens.
Thanks for the post though.
Who cares? (Score:2)
by PPH ( 736903 )
The AI application will just insert a batch of new errors.
Re: (Score:1)
What's the point of Quantum if IBM are just going to dump systemd and Gnome on it?
Re: (Score:3)
Gnome is fine but stay away from Wayland.
Re: (Score:2)
> Gnome is fine
Yuck, I can't stand toy UIs as desktop, and what would I do with a quantum machine anyway?
I'll stick with my abacus running openbox, thank you.
Re: (Score:2)
They wouldn't even run on it.
Re: (Score:2)
It's really impossible to say if it's running on it or not until you open the box.