News: 0177950967

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

'We Finally May Be Able to Rid the World of Mosquitoes. But Should We?' (yahoo.com)

(Sunday June 08, 2025 @11:34AM (EditorDavid) from the creating-a-buzz dept.)


It's no longer a hypothetical question, [1]writes the Washington Post . "In recent years, scientists have devised powerful genetic tools that may be able to eradicate mosquitoes and other pests once and for all."

But along with the ability to fight malaria, dengue, West Nile virus and other serious diseases, "the development of this technology also raises a profound ethical question: When, if ever, is it okay to intentionally drive a species out of existence...?"

> When so many wildlife conservationists are trying to save plants and animals from disappearing, the mosquito is one of the few creatures that people argue is actually worthy of extinction. Forget about tigers or bears; it's the tiny mosquito that is the [2]deadliest animal on Earth . The human misery caused by malaria is undeniable. Nearly 600,000 people died of the disease in 2023, [3]according to the World Health Organization , with the majority of cases in Africa... But recently, the Hastings Center for Bioethics, a research institute in New York, and Arizona State University brought together a group of bioethicists to discuss the potential pitfalls of intentionally trying to drive a species to extinction. In [4]a policy paper published in the journal Science last month, the group concluded that "deliberate full extinction might occasionally be acceptable, but only extremely rarely..."

>

> It's unclear how important malaria-carrying mosquitoes are to broader ecosystems. Little research has been done to figure out whether frogs or other animals that eat the insects would be able to find their meals elsewhere. Scientists are hotly debating whether a broader " [5]insect apocalypse " is underway in many parts of the world, which may imperil other creatures that depend on them for food and pollination... Instead, the authors said, geneticists should be able to use gene editing, vaccines and other tools to target not the mosquito itself, but the single-celled Plasmodium parasite that is responsible for malaria. That invisible microorganism — which a mosquito transfers from its saliva to a person's blood when it bites — is the real culprit.

A nonprofit research consortium called Target Malaria has genetically modified mosquitoes in their labs (which get core [6]funding from the Gates Foundation and from Open Philanthropy, backed by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and his wife). ), and hopes to deploy them in the wild within five years...



[1] https://www.yahoo.com/news/finally-may-able-rid-world-222833125.html

[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/07/01/mosquito-days-malaria-texas-florida/

[3] https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria

[4] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adv4045

[5] https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/04/23/how-make-bug-hotel-insect-decline-bees/

[6] https://targetmalaria.org/about-us/



Yes (Score:4)

by MpVpRb ( 1423381 )

The answer is yes, it's OK to eliminate mosquitos.

Some people waste far too much time thinking about silly questions.

No (Score:3)

by gweihir ( 88907 )

Obviously. It will take a few more centuries until we understand things well enough. Until we do, one such move could kill the human race. Fremi Paradox anyone?

As much as I hate them (Score:2)

by RitchCraft ( 6454710 )

As much as I hate mosquitos I don't believe we should exterminate them to the point of extinction. Doing so will most likely have unforeseen consequences down the road causing mass damage to the ecosystem. Find ways to fight the parasites instead if possible.

Re: (Score:3)

by sound+vision ( 884283 )

They currently "fight the parasites" by spraying pesticide indiscriminately on top of everything in residential areas. Targeting one species would be a much more surgical approach.

I've also been told that there is one particular species that feeds on humans, and that it is not native to the Americas. So it is not likely to occupy a critical niche in the ecosystem. Not sure how true that is, though.

Every hour on the hour, we lose a species for $ (Score:2)

by PeterM from Berkeley ( 15510 )

On average, every hour humans make a species extinct, for no better reason than to extract some more wealth.

How about we extinct some species for a good reason for a change? Malaria alone inflicts about 500,000 deaths per year, and a total economic burden of maybe a trillion dollars or more per year, and really messes up the development of much of the world.

And to eliminate malaria and all other mosquito-borne diseases, we only need to extinct about 34 species out of 3000+ species of mosquito.

Yes, let's do

Should I do my BOBBIE VINTON medley?