Football and Other Premium TV Being Pirated At 'Industrial Scale' (bbc.com)
(Friday May 30, 2025 @11:30PM (BeauHD)
from the ambivalence-and-inertia dept.)
- Reference: 0177875415
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/05/31/0029226/football-and-other-premium-tv-being-pirated-at-industrial-scale
- Source link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3n7dx2174o
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC:
> A lack of action by big tech firms is [1]enabling the "industrial scale theft" of premium video services, especially live sport , a new report says. The [2]research by Enders Analysis accuses Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft of "ambivalence and inertia" over a problem it says costs broadcasters revenue and puts users at an increased risk of cyber-crime. Gareth Sutcliffe and Ollie Meir, who authored the research, described the Amazon Fire Stick -- which they argue is the device many people use to access illegal streams -- as "a piracy enabler." [...] The device plugs into TVs and gives the viewer thousands of options to watch programs from legitimate services including the BBC iPlayer and Netflix. They are also being used to access illegal streams, particularly of live sport.
>
> In November last year, a Liverpool man who sold Fire Stick devices he reconfigured to allow people to illegally stream Premier League football matches was jailed. After uploading the unauthorized services on the Amazon product, he advertised them on Facebook. Another man from Liverpool was given a two-year suspended sentence last year after modifying fire sticks and selling them on Facebook and WhatsApp. According to data for the first quarter of this year, provided to Enders by Sky, 59% of people in UK who said they had watched pirated material in the last year while using a physical device said they had used a Amazon fire product. The Enders report says the fire stick enables "billions of dollars in piracy" overall. [...]
>
> The researchers also pointed to the role played by the "continued depreciation" of Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems, particularly those from Google and Microsoft. This technology enables high quality streaming of premium content to devices. Two of the big players are Microsoft's PlayReady and Google's Widevine. The authors argue the architecture of the DRM is largely unchanged, and due to a lack of maintenance by the big tech companies, PlayReady and Widevine "are now compromised across various security levels." Mr Sutcliffe and Mr Meir said this has had "a seismic impact across the industry, and ultimately given piracy the upper hand by enabling theft of the highest quality content." They added: "Over twenty years since launch, the DRM solutions provided by Google and Microsoft are in steep decline. A complete overhaul of the technology architecture, licensing, and support model is needed. Lack of engagement with content owners indicates this a low priority."
[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3n7dx2174o
[2] https://www.endersanalysis.com/reports/video-piracy-big-tech-clearly-unwilling-address-problem
> A lack of action by big tech firms is [1]enabling the "industrial scale theft" of premium video services, especially live sport , a new report says. The [2]research by Enders Analysis accuses Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft of "ambivalence and inertia" over a problem it says costs broadcasters revenue and puts users at an increased risk of cyber-crime. Gareth Sutcliffe and Ollie Meir, who authored the research, described the Amazon Fire Stick -- which they argue is the device many people use to access illegal streams -- as "a piracy enabler." [...] The device plugs into TVs and gives the viewer thousands of options to watch programs from legitimate services including the BBC iPlayer and Netflix. They are also being used to access illegal streams, particularly of live sport.
>
> In November last year, a Liverpool man who sold Fire Stick devices he reconfigured to allow people to illegally stream Premier League football matches was jailed. After uploading the unauthorized services on the Amazon product, he advertised them on Facebook. Another man from Liverpool was given a two-year suspended sentence last year after modifying fire sticks and selling them on Facebook and WhatsApp. According to data for the first quarter of this year, provided to Enders by Sky, 59% of people in UK who said they had watched pirated material in the last year while using a physical device said they had used a Amazon fire product. The Enders report says the fire stick enables "billions of dollars in piracy" overall. [...]
>
> The researchers also pointed to the role played by the "continued depreciation" of Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems, particularly those from Google and Microsoft. This technology enables high quality streaming of premium content to devices. Two of the big players are Microsoft's PlayReady and Google's Widevine. The authors argue the architecture of the DRM is largely unchanged, and due to a lack of maintenance by the big tech companies, PlayReady and Widevine "are now compromised across various security levels." Mr Sutcliffe and Mr Meir said this has had "a seismic impact across the industry, and ultimately given piracy the upper hand by enabling theft of the highest quality content." They added: "Over twenty years since launch, the DRM solutions provided by Google and Microsoft are in steep decline. A complete overhaul of the technology architecture, licensing, and support model is needed. Lack of engagement with content owners indicates this a low priority."
[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3n7dx2174o
[2] https://www.endersanalysis.com/reports/video-piracy-big-tech-clearly-unwilling-address-problem
"Good" (Score:2)
by SchnauzerGuy ( 647948 )
See the above subject
They're plenty motivated (Score:2)
by skogs ( 628589 )
Every single sports fan would purchase normal legal streaming if it wasn't such an unholy pain in the ass or wildly overpriced.
I'm a very simple example. I want to watch the NFL Vikings game in america. I'm not in the 'home zone' because I'm not a damned pleb that can't leave their home town. It isn't on free broadcast tv. Spending over $600 for approximately 9 games that I'll end up watching? Naw...I can find better things to do with my money.
You give me a simple option for $20 to watch the single game
The problem isn't DRM. (Score:2)
The problem isn't DRM, the problem is overpriced content and treating the customers like manure.
Also don't assume that customers will pay if they can't get pirated content. Most won't, so the monetary loss is fictional.