Open Source Advocate Argues DeepSeek is 'a Movement... It's Linux All Over Again' (infoworld.com)
- Reference: 0177069105
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/04/20/0332214/open-source-advocate-argues-deepseek-is-a-movement-its-linux-all-over-again
- Source link: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3960764/deepseeks-open-source-movement.html
This week he [2]contributed an opinion to piece to InfoWorld arguing that DeepSeek "may have originated in China, but it stopped being Chinese the minute it was released on Hugging Face with an [3]accompanying paper detailing its development."
> Soon after, a range of developers, including the Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (BAAI), scrambled to replicate DeepSeek's success but this time as open source software. BAAI, for its part, [4]launched OpenSeek , an ambitious effort to take DeepSeek's open-weight models and create a project that surpasses DeepSeek while uniting "the global open source communities to drive collaborative innovation in algorithms, data, and systems."
>
> If that sounds cool to you, it didn't to the U.S. government, which promptly [5]put BAAI on its "baddie" list . Someone needs to remind U.S. (and global) policymakers that no single country, company, or government can contain community-driven open source... DeepSeek didn't just have a moment. It's now very much a movement, one that will frustrate all efforts to contain it. DeepSeek, and the open source AI ecosystem surrounding it, has rapidly evolved from a brief snapshot of technological brilliance into something much bigger — and much harder to stop. Tens of thousands of developers, from seasoned researchers to passionate hobbyists, are now working on enhancing, tuning, and extending these open source models in ways no centralized entity could manage alone.
>
> For example, it's perhaps not surprising that [6]Hugging Face is actively attempting to reverse engineer and publicly disseminate DeepSeek's R1 model. Hugging Face, while important, is just one company, just one platform. But Hugging Face has attracted hundreds of thousands of developers who actively contribute to, adapt, and build on open source models, driving AI innovation at a speed and scale unmatched even by the most agile corporate labs.
>
> Hugging Face by itself could be stopped. But the communities it enables and accelerates cannot. Through the influence of Hugging Face and many others, variants of DeepSeek models are already finding their way into a wide range of applications. Companies like Perplexity are embedding these powerful open source models into consumer-facing services, proving their real-world utility. This democratization of technology ensures that cutting-edge AI capabilities are no longer locked behind the walls of large corporations or elite government labs but are instead openly accessible, adaptable, and improvable by a global community.
"It's Linux all over again..." Asay writes at one point. "What started as the passion project of a lone developer quickly blossomed into an essential, foundational technology embraced by enterprises worldwide," winning out "precisely because it captivated developers who embraced its promise and contributed toward its potential."
> We are witnessing a similar phenomenon with DeepSeek and the broader open source AI ecosystem, but this time it's happening much, much faster...
>
> Organizations that cling to proprietary approaches ( [7]looking at you, OpenAI! ) or attempt to exert control through restrictive policies ( [8]you again, OpenAI! ) are not just swimming upstream — they're attempting to dam an ocean. (Yes, OpenAI has now started to talk up open source, but it's a long way from releasing a DeepSeek/OpenSeek equivalent on GitHub.)
[1] https://interviews.slashdot.org/story/10/03/02/186206/matt-asay-answers-your-questions-about-ubuntu-and-canonical
[2] https://www.infoworld.com/article/3960764/deepseeks-open-source-movement.html
[3] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.12948
[4] https://github.com/FlagAI-Open/OpenSeek
[5] https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-war/article/3303997/beijing-research-lab-says-inclusion-export-control-list-undermines-global-ai-cooperation
[6] https://siliconangle.com/2025/01/28/hugging-face-wants-reverse-engineer-deepseeks-r1-reasoning-model/
[7] https://medium.com/@glonav.net/openai-how-open-are-you-really-with-proprietary-ai-models-a9442a3b93dc
[8] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/openai-calls-deepseek-state-controlled-162130551.html
Sooo... this is the year of ... (Score:4, Funny)
... deepseek on the desktop ?
Like it! (Score:5, Insightful)
It's way above my 'pay grade' but I wish them the very best. I'm sick of multinationals slurping up everything they can get hold of and giving absolutely nothing away.
Politicians (Score:2)
> "If that sounds cool to you, it didn't to the U.S. government, which promptly put BAAI on its "baddie" list"
It is pretty apparent over the years that politicians do not understand open source (nor the ramifications of many technologies).
Now, just because something is open source, doesn't mean it won't ever contain "bad" things- it entirely depends on who is participating in the project. But, unlike closed source, anyone can examine it and see what is in it and what it does, and can even fork it into a
What was he going on about? (Score:5, Insightful)
"it stopped being Chinese the minute it was released on Hugging Face"
No, it would stop being Chinese if other people generated a model without the same pro-CCP orientation baked in. It might resemble open source in some way if doing that was practical, even if no one has done it yet. But putting weights, a model card and even a puff-piece paper on Hugging Face do not come close to that.
"What started as the passion project of a lone developer [....]"
Is he confusing the Linux kernel for all of open source? I thought we got over that blinkered view of open source and free software 25 years ago.
Let's see some models that can actually be reproduced before claiming that LLMs are like open source software.
Re: (Score:2)
> "No, it would stop being Chinese if other people generated a model without the same pro-CCP orientation baked in. It might resemble open source in some way if doing that was practical"
That is a very good point. There is the project to use the model, and the model, itself. Although the project to use the model can be completely open, how is that even possible with a model- unless everything that was used to create the model were also open? And even if it were, which "normies" would have the resources
US crypto export regulations (Score:2)
It really sounds more like the early days of US crypto export regulations than linux/OSS.
Trump is going to build a wall around America (Score:2)
because then we will be supergreat! Go us!
Linux? Hahahaha, no. (Score:2)
Linux is a kernel reimplementation of SYS-V and BSD with a GNU userspace. There was never any doubt that it would be quite useful and work well. LLMs are experimental stuff that is still in seatch of an application and they definitely do not work well at this time and nobody knows whether that will change.
attempting to reverse engineer (Score:2)
"Hugging Face is actively attempting to reverse engineer and publicly disseminate DeepSeek's R1 model" sounds more dramatic than it is. They are using the public methods to build a new model.
DeepSeek did not only publish their model under the MIT license, but also described in the paper how to train it. Additionally, sometime after, they had an open source week where they released a lot of their tools as open source. DeepSeek is really not trying to hide what they did, but they are actively encouraging the
Re: (Score:1)
AleRunner (accidentally pressed AC it seems).
Re: (Score:3)
> ... close everything ...
At that point everyone has state-of-the-art and a good position for developing their own package. Why would anyone buy software and support when the CEO/senior dev. just 'fired' all his staff?
> ... BAAI on its "baddie" list.
So everyone except the USA can use this currently superior data-set. Worse, everyone else can contribute to making it better (and cheaper) than whatever data-sets the USA is selling. That's a brilliant plan from the USA government.
Re: (Score:2)
There's more to the GPL than software foundations. The license is important, precisely because the world has agreed universal copyright standards.
The purpose of the GPL is to use the world wide copyright protections as an enforcement mechanism for a more permissive license which enables unrestricted derivative works by all users.
I suppose, if you can find a country where copyright is not enforced, you could dispense with the provisions of the GPL, but it would still be needed in countries that enforce c