WSJ Says China 'Acknowledged Its Role in U.S. Infrastructure Hacks' (msn.com)
- Reference: 0177011053
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/04/13/006221/wsj-says-china-acknowledged-its-role-in-us-infrastructure-hacks
- Source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/in-secret-meeting-china-acknowledged-role-in-us-infrastructure-hacks/ar-AA1CGMb8
China was behind it, "Chinese officials acknowledged in a secret December meeting... according to people familiar with the matter..."
> The Chinese delegation linked years of intrusions into computer networks at U.S. ports, water utilities, airports and other targets, to increasing U.S. policy support for Taiwan, the people, who declined to be named, said... U.S. officials went public last year with unusually dire warnings about the [2]uncovered Volt Typhoon effort . They publicly attributed it to Beijing trying to get a foothold in U.S. computer networks so its army could quickly detonate damaging cyberattacks during a future conflict. [American officials at the meeting perceived the remarks as "intended to scare the U.S. from involving itself if a conflict erupts in the Taiwan Strait."]
>
> The Chinese official's remarks at the December meeting were indirect and somewhat ambiguous, but most of the American delegation in the room interpreted it as a tacit admission and a warning to the U.S. about Taiwan, a former U.S. official familiar with the meeting said... In a statement, the State Department didn't comment on the meeting but said the U.S. had made clear to Beijing it will "take actions in response to Chinese malicious cyber activity," describing the hacking as "some of the gravest and most persistent threats to U.S. national security...."
>
> A Chinese official would likely only acknowledge the intrusions even in a private setting if instructed to do so by the top levels of Xi's government, said Dakota Cary, a China expert at the cybersecurity firm SentinelOne. The tacit admission is significant, he said, because it may reflect a view in Beijing that the likeliest military conflict with the U.S. would be over Taiwan and that a more direct signal about the stakes of involvement needed to be sent to the Trump administration. "China wants U.S. officials to know that, yes, they do have this capability, and they are willing to use it," Cary said.
The article notes that top U.S. officials have said America's Defense Department "will pursue more offensive cyber strikes against China."
But it adds that the administration "also plans to dismiss hundreds of cybersecurity workers in sweeping job cuts and last week fired the director of the National Security Agency and his deputy, fanning concerns from some intelligence officials and lawmakers that the government would be weakened in defending against the attacks."
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/in-secret-meeting-china-acknowledged-role-in-us-infrastructure-hacks/ar-AA1CGMb8
[2] https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/u-s-disables-chinese-hacking-operation-that-targeted-critical-infrastructure-184bb407
oops... (Score:1)
"The article notes that top U.S. officials have said America's Defense Department 'will pursue more offensive cyber strikes against China.' " Oooops, DOGE fired those guys.
Headline is 100% accurate, not (Score:2, Insightful)
> The Chinese official's remarks at the December meeting were indirect and ambiguous , but most of the American delegation in the room interpreted it...
Another example of our wonderful mainstream media working hard to bring us truth and accuracy every day.
Re: (Score:2)
We based our conclusions on the brand of watch he wore.
Propaganda? (Score:2)
> U.S. officials went public last year
> The Chinese delegation linked years of intrusions into computer networks at U.S. ports, water utilities, airports and other targets, to increasing U.S. policy support for Taiwan, the people, who declined to be named, said
> The Chinese official's remarks at the December meeting were indirect and somewhat ambiguous, but most of the American delegation in the room interpreted it as a tacit admission and a warning to the U.S. about Taiwan, a former U.S. official familiar with the meeting said..
> "China wants U.S. officials to know that, yes, they do have this capability, and they are willing to use it," Cary said.
Finally a real name attached ... to pure speculation. One might ask why China would think it is necessary to confirm the capability or their willingness to use it to people who are accusing them of both. So the only named source here is a self-promoter from some obscure security company with no real indication of any particular expertise. He's a "China expert."
This is really an indication of how the power relationship between journalists and sources has become entirely one-sided. There was a time when jo
Re: (Score:2)
IF it happens (which hopefully it doesn't), then it may involve any of these elements:
1) Taiwan is blockaded by ships and airplanes in [1]another military exercise [cnn.com], when suddenly the start shooting.
2) Cut all communication to Taiwan by cutting fiber and blowing up satellites, including GPS.
3) Missile barrage aimed at US military bases in Okinawa, Guam, Sasebo, Seoul, Yokohama, Chinhe, etc.
4) Attempts to sink US carriers with "hypersonic missiles."
5) Hacking US communication systems to prevent a coord
[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/01/china/china-taiwan-drills-live-fire-escalation-intl-hnk/index.html
"unstated ability to get access to systems" (Score:2)
[1]Transcript of Internet Caucus Panel Discussion [techlawjournal.com]
Re: Administration's new encryption policy. Date: September 28, 1999.
[2]Weldon statement. [techlawjournal.com]
> Rep. Curt Weldon : Thank you. Let me see if I can liven things up here in the last couple of minutes of the luncheon. First of all, I apologize for being late. And I thank Bob and the members of the caucus for inviting me here.
> ...
> But the point is that when John Hamre briefed me, and gave me the three key points of this change, there are a lot of unanswered questions. He
[1] http://www.techlawjournal.com/cong106/encrypt/19990928a.htm
[2] http://www.techlawjournal.com/cong106/encrypt/19990928a.htm#weldon1
Re: (Score:2)
On the other Foot:
[1]Microsoft Opens Source to China [slashdot.org]
> Reader NZheretic points out that less than a year ago, Jim Allchin swore under oath that disclosing the Windows operating system source code could damage national security.
[1] https://slashdot.org/story/03/02/28/1639216/microsoft-opens-source-to-china
"...according to people familiar with the matter." (Score:2)
[insert "Sure, Jan" meme GIF here]
A State Department stenographer newspaper accusing the latest boogeyman and quoting unnamed sources. **rolls eyes**
Secret Chinese December meeting ;) (Score:1)
Please leave this kind of Neocon cyberBS to NPR.
Re:Secret Chinese December meeting ;) (Score:4, Insightful)
You should have gotten used to the daily two minutes hate already, now that it is running non-stop.
Re: (Score:3)
[1]https://www.foxnews.com/politi... [foxnews.com]
[1] https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chinese-officials-claimed-behind-closed-doors-prc-played-role-us-cyberattacks-report
Re: (Score:3)
[1]https://i.imgur.com/Zckt8tZ.pn... [imgur.com]
[1] https://i.imgur.com/Zckt8tZ.png