News: 0176676731

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Zoox Robotaxis Do Not Meet Federal Safety Standards, Agency Says (washingtonpost.com)

(Tuesday March 11, 2025 @06:40PM (BeauHD) from the not-so-fast dept.)


An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Washington Post:

> An Amazon-backed self-driving taxi [1]failed to meet vehicle safety standards because it lacks basics like a brake pedal and rearview mirrors, according to a report by federal inspectors that raises questions about the industry's plans to put a new generation of autonomous vehicles on U.S. roads. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration report was produced as part of a review last year of an unusual vehicle by Amazon subsidiary Zoox that, without a steering wheel or other human controls, has no way for a person to drive. Zoox has asserted that the vehicle's technology, backed by artificial intelligence, complies with the agency's standards. But the NHTSA report documents "apparent noncompliances" with eight safety rules.

>

> The contents of the previously undisclosed review suggest that rules written when autonomous vehicles were the stuff of futuristic musings pose a legal impediment to the industry's ambitions, even as plans for self-driving vehicles accelerate. Zoox has a small pilot fleet on the roads in California and Nevada and says it has completed thousands of trips carrying employees and guests. It is finalizing plans to launch public service in Las Vegas this year. [...] By documenting the apparent noncompliances of the Zoox, NHTSA could be setting the table for a recall, under agency procedures. It is unclear whether the Trump administration will attempt a change in course. The agency said it remains in discussion with Zoox and was "considering all options."

>

> Zoox could have sought an exemption from the safety rules, but NHTSA has never granted one to an autonomous passenger vehicle. Instead, the company self-certified that its vehicle complied with the rules as it raced to be the first company to put a purpose-built robotaxi on the road and claim a share of what could become a multi trillion-dollar market. Zoox's vehicle bears little resemblance to a normal car. The plan is for customers to summon a ride using an app, much like a regular ride-hailing vehicle, getting in through bus-like doors and sitting facing one another. The vehicle navigates itself, seeing the world through a set of cameras and laser-based sensors. It largely relies on its own abilities to drive, but the company says teams of remote operators can seize control to help handle unusual situations. Passengers can call for assistance via a touch screen and open the doors using an emergency release.

"We will continue to support transportation technology innovation while maintaining the safety of America's roads," NHTSA said in a statement.

"Our recent discussions with NHTSA are about mirrors, windshield wipers, a defroster, and a foot-activated brake pedal -- equipment that makes sense for vehicles with human drivers, but not for the Zoox purpose-built robotaxi," Zoox said in a statement. "Our purpose-built design means that the robotaxi can never be operated by a human driver, and our AI driver doesn't rely on this equipment to view the world."



[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/03/11/zoox-autonomous-nhtsa-safety/



Who needs brake pedals if you got lawyers? (Score:1)

by thesjaakspoiler ( 4782965 )

A big team of lawyers are a much better substitute for all these so-called safety measures when pedestrians do dumb stuff like crossing the road.

Re: (Score:2)

by dohzer ( 867770 )

It's almost as though the federal inspectors forgot about profits and share prices.

Confused (Score:3)

by Valgrus Thunderaxe ( 8769977 )

Why does an autonomous vehicle need a pedal?

Re: Confused (Score:3)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

So that it can be operated by a human when the self driving equipment fails, or in an emergency.

Re: (Score:3)

by Valgrus Thunderaxe ( 8769977 )

So there has to be a human there in the event the pedal needs to be operated? Is the passenger expected to climb into the driver's seat to operate this pedal?

A bit of a silly design (Score:3)

by willoughby ( 1367773 )

Even a JohnnyCab has a joystick which a person can use to drive. Well, after ripping out the robot driver... but, still...

Move fast and kill people (Score:1)

by thegarbz ( 1787294 )

That's the goal of these "disruptors" right?

Also is anyone surprised the NHTSA still exists? I thought Musk DOGEd them.

I don't want a Johnny Cab (Score:2)

by Smonster ( 2884001 )

Are they going to charge way less than car with human drivers? Because I can't think of another way they could convince people to rise in these murder machines. But offer a free prize or a discount and people will trample each other for it. See: Black Friday. Personally I wouldn't mind owning a self driving car that could take me home from a bar, party, or entertainment venue like a stadium or arena. But I would still want to drive it most of the time. If I am in a car, I would rather be the one driving.

If safety is your concern... (Score:2)

by Nostalgia4Infinity ( 3752305 )

Waymo's driverless vehicles have reduced injury claims by 100 percent compared to human drivers, with an incident rate of 0.41 per million miles, which is 6.8 times lower than human drivers.

[1]https://www.theverge.com/2023/... [theverge.com]

[1] https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/20/24006712/waymo-driverless-million-mile-safety-compare-human

"multi trillion-dollar market" (Score:2)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

The whole world taxi economy is something like $250B usd. Are they suggesting automation will claim it all and grow that market by a minimum of 8x and presumably more?

Their Claims (Score:2)

by SlashbotAgent ( 6477336 )

The robo car companies are saying that that they will replace all cars on the road. So, yes. They do want us to believe that they will minimum 8x the market.

Meanwhile, there is zero chance of me getting into one of these butt ugly Zoox boxes. Not even for campus or airport shuttle service. There is also the issue of convincing people to give up the sense of freedom and autonomy that they enjoy in their personal vehicles. So, robo car companies have got their work cut out for them. Both technology work and m

This was a manufactured story (Score:2)

by abulafia ( 7826 )

Zooks self-certified. Their lawyers knew they'd get a rejection over rules that sound stupid for a self-driving car - with safety-critical stuff like this, regulators are absolutely going to enforce rules, even if it looks silly.

So the only reasonable conclusion is Amazon wanted this article. Presumably to take to Jeff's new master and beg for rules changes, instead of doing it the way little people are supposed to.

Someone was smoking in the computer room and set off the halon systems.