Could a Sponge Made from Squid Bones Help Remove Microplastics? (cnn.com)
- Reference: 0175780719
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/12/28/2124223/could-a-sponge-made-from-squid-bones-help-remove-microplastics
- Source link: https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/17/science/microplastics-sponge-wuhan-china-scn-intl-hnk/index.html
> They then tested the sponge in four different water samples, taken from irrigation water, pond water, lake water and sea water, and found it removed up to 99.9% of microplastics, according to a [3]study published last month in Science Advances ... The sponge created by the Wuhan researchers was able to absorb microplastics both by physically intercepting them and through electromagnetic attraction, the study said.
>
> Previously studied methods for absorbing plastics tend to be expensive and difficult to make, limiting their scalability. Last year, researchers in Qingdao, China [4]developed a synthetic sponge made of starch and gelatin designed to remove microplastics from water, though its efficacy varied depending on water conditions. The low cost and wide availability of both cotton and squid bones mean [the Chinese researchers' sponge] "has great potential to be used in the extraction of microplastic from complex water bodies," according to the study.
>
> Shima Ziajahromi, a lecturer at Australia's Griffith University who studies microplastics, called the squid-cotton-sponge method "promising" and said it could be an effective way to "clean up the high risk and vulnerable aquatic ecosystem." However, the study's authors did not address whether the sponge can remove microplastics that sink to the sediment, which is the majority of microplastics in our waters, said Ziajahromi, who was not involved in the study. Another "critical issue" is the proper disposal of the sponges, Ziajahromi said. "Although the material is biodegradable, the microplastics it absorbs need to be disposed of properly," she said. "Without careful management, this process risks transferring microplastics from one ecosystem to another."
>
> Ultimately, Ziajahromi added, minimizing plastic pollution is in the first place should remain a "top priority."
[1] https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/12/24/038201/commercial-tea-bags-release-millions-of-microplastics-entering-human-intestinal-cells
[2] https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/17/science/microplastics-sponge-wuhan-china-scn-intl-hnk/index.html
[3] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adn8662
[4] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389423009688
It could probably help (Score:2)
remove Squids.
Solution? (Score:3)
Treating the symptoms is necessary but it's still not fixing the problem/disease
Squds bones? (Score:4, Interesting)
There is no such. They have a rod made of chitin ie same as exoskeletons of insects but it's minuscule.
So how many squids do we need to kill for this?
Re: Squds bones? (Score:2)
> how many squids do we need
[1]One [iflscience.com]. If its big enough.
[1] https://assets.iflscience.com/assets/articleNo/65325/aImg/61935/kraken-meta.jpg
No (Score:2)
Just another hallucination serving to continue to crap were we eat a little longer so some rich assholes can get even richer. As a whole, the human race is incapable of protecting the environment it critically needs to survive. All that intelligence, and we go for a collapse and possible extinction by overpopulation and overpollution. Like some dumb, barely sentient critters. Pathetic.
But what else does it remove? (Score:2)
Sounds like great technology, if it can scale.
But what else does it remove from the water? For example, microorganisms that are part of the ocean's food chain? That could be a problem.
I looked at the CNN article, and the abstract of the published article, but found nothing on this. Sorry, I don't have time to read the whole article, so if someone does, please update.
Is it selective? (Score:2)
From a look at the paper it appears that they get good adsorption of common plastic flavors on something that isn't hideously exotic and expensive or made of its own issues, which is good; but I'm curious whether that's enough for the 'complex water bodies' and 'aquatic ecosystems' cases mentioned.
If you are just scrubbing wastewater it isn't really an issue; everything that isn't water is probably something you want to remove, and in the case of all but the least alarming wastewater some amount of nonto
squid bones (Score:2)
Squid bones are as rare as hens' teeth, seein' as squid don't have bones.
Maybe so... (Score:1)
I'm going to start hoarding squid bones in case demand skyrockets.