Price of popularity: Linux Mint's success also means maintainer stress
- Reference: 1771240443
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/02/16/mints_success_and_stress/
- Source link:
The Mint project's latest post thanks a record-breaking 1,000 + donors, and talks about future plans – which may include a slower release schedule.
We covered the release of [2]Linux Mint 22.3 in mid-January, and apparently it's been a hit. The Linux Mint project received an impressive 1,393 donations last month, totalling $47,312 (£34,713) – a new record, and aside from the controversial [3]Distrowatch rankings , it is another decent measure of the distro's deserved popularity. The blog post also mentions new features that the [4]development team are working on. These show the breadth of problems that a widely used distro faces.
[5]
The team is working on further improving Cinnamon's [6]input method support, such as automatically switching keyboard layout when choosing a particular input method – Clement Lefebvre, founder, project leader and main developer of Linux Mint, gives the example of automatically switching to a Japanese layout when the user chooses [7]mozc . Another cross-desktop issue is managing user accounts, and so the team is adding this feature to the new Mint System Administration tool that appeared in the latest version.
[8]
[9]
Work on official Wayland support in Cinnamon continues, and one issue the Mint team is taking on is screensaver support. Currently Cinnamon's screensavers only work if you're using X11. Quite simply, Wayland has no provision for screensavers. This is by design, and the creator of [10]XScreensaver , the inimitable Jamie Zawinski, has [11]discussed the problems with some feeling :
Wayland [12]does not support screen savers : it does not have any provision that allows screen savers to even exist in any meaningful way. If you value screen savers, that's kind of a problem.
Why doesn't it? Well, I suppose the designers of Wayland
have no joy in their cold, black hearts simply do not value screen savers.
It's worth a read – JWZ always is – and the struck-out text especially speaks to us. Notably, he discusses some of the issues with trying to add support for screensavers to a Wayland compositor.
With all these efforts going on – some of them substantial undertakings – it's no wonder that the developers are feeling the strain. The final section of the blog is titled Longer Development Cycle and talks about the pressure of Mint's semi-annual point releases, ending:
With a release every six months plus LMDE, we spend more time testing, fixing, and releasing than developing.
We're thinking about changing that and adopting a longer development cycle. As it happens, our next release will be based on a new LTS and we just ran out of codenames.
This wouldn't be the first time the Mint project has changed its release cycle. Linux Mint 1.0 "Ada" was based on Kubuntu 6.06, Canonical's first ever LTS release of Ubuntu. From then until Mint 16, which The Register [13]reviewed in December 2013 , Mint tracked all Ubuntu releases, including the interim ones. Since [14]Mint 17 the following year , it switched to only offering versions based on Ubuntu LTS releases – but each major version is followed by point releases, which follow after the upstream point releases of Ubuntu LTS – and all of these receive long-term support, as does Ubuntu itself. It's a lot of maintenance work.
The Reg FOSS desk has looked at each release since [15]Linux Mint 21 entered beta , and we have noticed that only the flavor with Mint's in-house Cinnamon desktop gets a new version of the desktop with each point release. In contrast, the Xfce and MATE editions stay with the version of the desktop that they shipped with, which they inherit from the corresponding Ubuntu LTS.
As the Mint developers look for ways to reduce the effort they spend on testing and release, perhaps they might consider reducing the number of the non-flagship editions. If only the Cinnamon edition gets new desktops, then perhaps the others could be dropped to more minor releases – even if this means altering the numbering scheme.
[16]
Or, alternatively, maybe it's time to prune the number of different editions. Back in 2018, Linux Mint 19 dropped the KDE desktop, dropping the number of desktops from four to three. Maybe it's time to do that again. We are loath to suggest it, because we're very fond of Xfce around the Irish Sea wing of Vulture Towers, but the field of Ubuntu flavours with Xfce is already served exceptionally well.
[17]Contain your Windows apps inside Linux Windows
[18]OK, so Anthropic's AI built a C compiler. That don't impress me much
[19]The big FOSS vendors don't eat their own dogfood – they pay for proprietary groupware
[20]The year of the European Union Linux desktop may finally arrive
Obviously, there is the official Xubuntu. It offers a [21]minimal install option with no Snap packages installed , for those averse to Canonical's cross-distro packaging format. There's also Linux Lite, which has neither Snap nor Flatpak; we looked at [22]version 7.6 in September 2025 , but at the end of last month, [23]Linux Lite 7.8 came out . There's also [24]Asmi Linux 24.04 which lets the user choose which packaging formats to support.
Another Ubuntu- and Xfce-based alternative distro is on its way out. The other beginner-friendly Ubuntu-based distro to come out of Dublin, Zorin OS, is [25]sunsetting Zorin OS Lite , its Xfce-based variant. One of the reasons is that the full-fat GNOME-based edition runs well – even on low-end computers – now. That applies equally to Linux Mint – and while MATE isn't quite as light as Xfce, it does run perfectly well on computers lacking full hardware 3D acceleration.
In an ideal world, we'd like to see these separate projects cooperate and maybe share some of the maintenance burden – a distro that combined Mint Xfce with Zorin OS Lite's themes and Linux Lite's handy accessory tools could be a very tempting offering – but that seems unlikely to happen. ®
Get our [26]Tech Resources
[1] https://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=4991
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/16/linux_mint_223_zena_officially_release/
[3] https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=popularity
[4] https://linuxmint.com/teams.php
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aZNNMyNsr7TxmJmbjnp6jAAAAYE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[6] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Input_method
[7] https://github.com/google/mozc
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aZNNMyNsr7TxmJmbjnp6jAAAAYE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aZNNMyNsr7TxmJmbjnp6jAAAAYE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/
[11] https://www.jwz.org/blog/2023/09/wayland-and-screen-savers/
[12] https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/man1.html#17
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2013/12/11/mint_16_review/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2014/06/02/mint_17_review/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/14/mint_21_beta/
[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aZNNMyNsr7TxmJmbjnp6jAAAAYE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[17] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/14/winapps_and_winboat/
[18] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/13/anthropic_c_compiler/
[19] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/12/suse_runs_ms/
[20] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/27/the_european_union_linux_desktop/
[21] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/30/xubuntu_2404_snapless_ubuntu/
[22] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/04/linux_lite_76/
[23] https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=9811
[24] https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/15/asmi_2404_ubuntu_without_snap/
[25] https://help.zorin.com/docs/getting-started/getting-zorin-os-lite/
[26] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Mint FanBoi Here
I prefer Mate, but I have XFCE, IceWm and Cinnamon also installed om most Mint. I also have Mate on the Distro on the RPi4b, which doesn't have Mint.
I use a very non-standard theme on Mate and screen sizes from a less than HD 11″ to a pair of 27″ 4K HDR with an optional 3rd HD o/p for a DVB-T modulator.
Applications which us QT badly (Viber) or do their own theme ignoring the system GUI entirely are annoying (Disks rather than GParted, or Mozilla anything, or any Web browser). There are a lot of arrogant idiots when it comes to GUIs.
Re: Mint FanBoi Here
I feel exactly the same way with Ubuntu Mate - it keeps out of the way so I can get work done and there are no borking updates (here's looking at you, Redmond).
Re: Mint FanBoi Here
Cachy user here. There seems to be a common thread to this "Just Works" thing...
Re: Mint FanBoi Here
I would very happily pay a monthly sub to Mint, and have given one-off donations, but sadly there doesn't seem to be any simple facility to automatically pay monthly/annually—just like a magazine sub.
Re: Mint FanBoi Here
I've actually just recently noticed that the Linux Mint folks offer [1]several options for donations , one of them being a monthly payment through Patreon.
[1] https://linuxmint.com/donors.php
Re: Mint FanBoi Here
Looks like a market opportunity…
Really want a site, as simple as Ninite.com, where a user simply selects the projects they wish to support, select a payment amount, collection frequency and a money distribution rule and all done. So providing a simple way for people to financially contribute to all the various open source projects maintaining the software they use.
Re: Mint FanBoi Here
I can only agree.
I've used any of the three existing Mint flavours at some point in time and I like all of them, and anyway it's an absolutely great achievement in UI design and theming that all of them look almost identical. In the end I stayed with Cinnamon only because I find it even a little bit more straightforward in usage than the others – and for quite some time even rather lowly hardware has been more than capable to run it, too.
> the full-fat GNOME-based edition runs well – even on low-end computers
No it doesn't; it's even more bloated than it ever has been!
I can barely run Cinnamon on a 3 year old budget (maybe around €200-300) ASUS laptop for a tech illiterate relative.
I don't want to imagine how GNOME's gonna run on it...
GNOME on a cheap laptop
I've got a laptop that was very much in that age / price range (Ryzen 3250u based) and I find it perfectly satisfactory running GNOME.
Ran fine on a 2013 Chromebook for me, with 4GB RAM and 16GB of eMMC storage. Switching between applications was slow, but that was down to having such little memory and storage.
'such little memory' How we laughed.
Not my experience
That doesn't seem typical to me... For about three and a half years, a lowly Pentium N5030 laptop with 8GB RAM and a non-NVME SSD, which may not have been quite low-end in 2022 but rather is in 2026, running Mint Cinnamon, was by far my most used personal computer even for a little bit of software development in Eclipse and IntelliJ, and would still be today had it not succumbed to the physical hardships it was subjected to under my care... (The only thing I couldn't properly do was running Windows in a Virtual Box VM, but that was more due to the limited RAM than anything else...) And for many applications, even 4 GB would have been sufficient, as long as not too many things were run in parallel.
Inevitable?
Pack as much "fashion-victim" software into the distro as you can (systemd, wayland, snap, flatpak).
Wait for experienced Linux users to leave in disgust at this.
Welcome truck-loads of windoze escapees (who LOVE the fashion-victim stuff) needing much higher levels of support.
Re: Inevitable?
IOW - "Why can't everyone be more like me?"
Re: Inevitable?
You know what they say about assumptions!
For my part, I assume you don't like the message and are clutching at straws because you know it is true ;)
Re: Inevitable?
"No, it's the children who are wrong."
"fashion-victim" softwarenevitable?
I have always been a fan of Mint. But time and time again I have tried to install programs and start them on boot up but have NEVER been able to understand systemd. In a previous life I would install fault tolerant systems with failover and would not been possible with systemd obsfucation. Using MX Linux now but that is riddled with systemd commands.
Wish there was a easy Rpi OS without sytemd.
Wayland
Bringing less than before and more problems.
Re: Wayland
The show control software I use that was flaky as hell on X is rock solid on Wayland. YMMV.
Drop Xfce...
...please don't suggest that, I for one, love the Xfce version with inappropriate passion.
niche
"while MATE isn't quite as light as Xfce, it does run perfectly well on computers lacking full hardware 3D acceleration"
I'm happy with Cinnamon on my daily driver and Mate does the job very well on really low-spec gear, the kind you can pick up for a hundred quid brand new. However, there's one scenario where even Mate slows things down enough to be annoying, and that's running remotely with XRDP. There Xfce is noticeably snappier.
-A.
I use MATE and am so happy with it. Previous comments sum it up: unobtrusive, lets you get on, doesn't change things, I feel respected.
I finally moved from Windows to Mint MATE last year and not a single regret. I still dual boot with Windows to use Steam but that's because some of my games don't work well with Proton and I am not quite ready to say goodbye to them!
[automatically switching keyboard layout ]
No thank you.
Thankfully being Linux it most likely can be disabled.
I love Mint but my Desktop is a Dinosaur so I am forced to use Ubuntu Pro on it.
And this not a good year for hardware upgrades unfortunately.
A grouse about Linux Mint
Overall, Linux Mint is a pleasure to use. I have it on three devices.
Recently, an annoyance has arisen. The 'spices' quite often, but not invariably, become erratic and one is given the choice of switching them off or of reloading them. The former renders the screen layout unappealing. The latter may entail restarting some processes, e.g. a browser or the switch off procedure.
£25 is the average donation
So not much, affordable to most.
It would be interesting to see how many are corporate donations vs individuals. I suspect very few corporate.
Ancient hardware
Running Mint / Cinnamon on a Fujitsu Q520 i7 dating from 2015 with 8GB of RAM and a SSD.
Does everything that I need other than one Win only CAD program.
Cost £95 plus 4GB of s/h RAM and a cheap 128GB SSD that I had in the box of bits.
Takes up next to no space on the desk and just works. Connected to a 27" monitor and is my daily driver.
I love it because it's simple and just works without the OS getting in the way.
M$ would be well advised to take note!
I use Mint XFCE on three desktops and three laptops. It's shit, but at least it's less shit than Windows. Amidst the issues: random freezes, sound doesn't work reliably (well, it is Linux), XFCE crashes if LibreOffice tried to display large fonts, printing is a mess and with the last update they broke my scanner terminally by replacing libsane with libsane1.
It's a tribute to just how bad the alternatives are than I stick with this shit.
Mint is so vanilla it's just too boring......also never going to use anything on an ubuntu base. Until I finally sit down and build my own distro CachyOS is in a league of its own.
Mint FanBoi Here
Ok, I'll say it. I've been using Mint Cinnamon for a decade or more, and love it. On those rare occasions when I'm forced to use Windows, or my partner's Apple, I find myself going "Dear God! Why?"
My choice is simple: things stay the same. They don't change. My desktop doesn't change. The commands that I use remain the same. With few exceptions, it installs every program that I need automatically, and they don't change either. (Hello LibreOffice!)
And I am happy that I can consistently choose to let it install updates and everything STILL works fine.
That, in a nutshell, is why I like Mint. It doesn't get in my way. It lets me work without nuisances and barriers. It feels safe, and stable, and comfortable. It feels like I'm respected by the maintainers.
And it has never demanded a subscription payment, and doesn't shove advertisements in my face. Or force unwanted AI crap down my throat.