The Linux mid-life crisis that's an opportunity for Tux-led transformation
- Reference: 1770629410
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/02/09/the_linux_midlife_crisis_thats/
- Source link:
Although he's blessed with world-class nominative determinism – "On your tod" is British slang for "on your own," and milling C is exactly what he's been doing all these years – nobody needs a life sentence in solitary, keeping a vital component like sudo secure and up to date. Nor can core utilities rely on such devotion. Even the most heroic, talented, glorious human being in that position remains a single point of failure for oh so many reasons.
Sudo maintainer, handling utility for more than 30 years, is looking for support [1]READ MORE
There are three factors here that threaten to tip this aspect of Linux life into its own mid-life crisis. The original cadre of developers who glued the GNU core utilities onto the brash new Linux kernel are getting older, and any number of life changes from incipient boredom through to alien abduction will eventually pluck them away. Then there's the massive change in status of Linux from 1996 to today. Finally, there's nothing except ad-hoc happenstance guiding the next generation of maintainers.
Of these, the most important is the maturing of Linux from a scrappy rebel band to a mature, major empire. In its early years, Linux looked like a hobby project because it was. Few saw the potential it had to release the world from the baleful embrace of Microsoft and a massively compromised Unix sphere of confusion. Those who did see that had both the fire of revolutionaries and the wherewithal to build and build and build until it became true. That's a burning sun of justified satisfaction to fire motivation and dedication. Now the Hacienda has been built, rebuilding the walls needs a different mindset.
This is a cultural problem, and it will become pressing. FOSS in general and core components in particular have many problems around funding, security, lifecycle management, self-regulation, and communication. Some of these problems are so entrenched and enormous, they are barely acknowledged, such as the flood of shoddy Linux-based firmware in consumer electronics.
[2]
So it seems churlish to add a new and seemingly vague angle of angst to worry about. It's one that could unlock the rest, though, and it's one with many parallels elsewhere. Every established area of human endeavor has created filters, pipelines, and structures to replenish and direct the human capital on which it depends.
[3]
[4]
Industrial capitalism calibrates the potential of people through cadres of assessors disguised as educators, and offers various places on the spectrum of survival to status as motivation. Other tribes, such as the performing arts and sports, have talent scouts and a different mix of status rewards, a far more heterogeneous set of on-ramps and pathways. More freedom, more uncertainty, different tiers of glittering prizes.
Open source has aspects of all of the above, heavily disguised as just another branch of technical capitalism. By recognizing those places where it is culturally distinct, where it can look enough like a palace with distinct options that reward distinct talents and personalities better than just taking the king's shilling. Reader, we give you the Tux Talent Academy (TTA).
[5]
Open and distributed, with clear goals and constitution, the TTA brings together those in academia and industry who regularly come into contact with early career developers, and who also have a deep knowledge and experience of the open source scene. Not necessarily FOSS developers themselves – a degree of insulation from some of the politics is no bad thing – they can spot people who have the skills, temperament, and philosophical mindset to become the new stars of FOSS.
[6]Open source's new mission: Rebuild a continent's tech stack
[7]The plan for Linux after Torvalds has a kernel of truth: There isn't one
[8]Mexit, not Brexit, is the new priority for the UK
[9]When even Microsoft can't understand its own Outlook, big tech is stuck in a swamp of its own making
Those who respond favorably to a tap on the shoulder, as well as those who are motivated to engage, get a sounding board for where they may make the most difference, and how that might work in practice. This would include very practical, career-enhancing consequences. Linux utilities, for example, should be much higher status than they are.
The TTA would talk to existing developers and maintainers, working out what the future could look like, and matchmaking with those who might be a part of it. Becoming a TTA graduate like that would mark out someone as having a particularly valuable mix of skills and vision, one sufficiently valuable to get support from employers in time and other resources. TTA faculty, in turn, would become a powerful lobbying force within education, industry and other organizations, reflecting the needs of FOSS as a whole.
For this to work, the right people with the right motivations need to find the right mix of formal and informal working. Nothing FOSS can't do, just tuned to the needs of a mature, vital, and unique part of the great digital endeavor. That means recognizing its own culture, its own unique needs and rewards.
Talent will out, but there's no reason Tux can't lend a helping flipper. ®
Get our [10]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/03/sudo_maintainer_asks_for_help/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aYm-UdrGNh2rd-GIfOf3_gAAAgY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aYm-UdrGNh2rd-GIfOf3_gAAAgY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aYm-UdrGNh2rd-GIfOf3_gAAAgY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aYm-UdrGNh2rd-GIfOf3_gAAAgY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/19/open_sources_new_mission_rebuild/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/14/the_plan_for_linux_after/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/08/opinion_column_mexit_not_brexit/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/31/opinion_column_big_tech/
[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Capitalism at its finest
To your point
> Capitalism at its finest: "Screw you, I got mine - AND yours!"
Consider this statement from the article
> In its early years, Linux looked like a hobby project because it was. Few saw the potential it had to release the world from the baleful embrace of Microsoft and a massively compromised Unix sphere of confusion.
As I recall, 20+ years ago Linux proponents were going round telling everyone how their OS was "superior" to any Microsoft offerings. Particularly for applications such as web servers which were becoming increasingly important.
Whatever thought was given to the technical brilliance of Linux they gave little to zero though on how to, you know, make money and use that to their advantage! Whatever your views are on Microsoft one thing they've always been good at is making money and then using that to support their goals. Which is why despite Windows still not being technically brilliant it's very much alive and kicking.
Microsoft don't have any problems recruiting young people and actively go out to colleges and unis with big banners shouting from the rooftops. They can afford it. People work for money. They already have the next generation ready and willing to work on their products. Is that really true when it comes to Linux?
Amazon and Oracle (and many others) used this premise very much to their advantage. Blaming them for that is a little bit ironic. Could have been a very different story if the Linux mindset had factored in an incredibly important angle which it vastly overlooked, particularly in the early days. It's never caught up.
Re: Capitalism at its finest
The deal was get the software for free and pay for the service. I don't think in the late 80s when GPL 1.0 was released that people imagined that everything would be ripped-off wholesale by a mere handful of corporations and resold to everyone else. A thousand flowers did bloom then.
They can do that because they subverted Free Software
Companies like to use MIT licensed projects because it lets them take all that work and give nothing back. The various forms of GPL compel them to give back the code changes they make and thus benefit everyone else. Which is why the corporates hate the GPL and constantly campaign against it.
If you are working on Open Source Software it's time to stop and switch to Free Software so that, at the very least, your fown can remain free (as in speech) forever.
Re: They can do that because they subverted Free Software
Apropos of this, which licence would best ward off corporate vampires? E.g. AGPL or [1]EU Public Licence to make them contribute code or [2]FUTO Source First to make them contribute money. Any others?
[1] https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/eupl-text-eupl-12
[2] https://sourcefirst.com/
Automated scout
...the TTA brings together those in academia and industry who regularly come into contact with early career developers...
But, but, we were promised that AI would solve this for us. AI would replace all the entry level engineering positions and mature into career developers outpacing any humanoid in the world. It is the masterpiece society when humans only have to sit passively by and watch the professional computer intelligence to solve all of our problems.
We require an AI scout to find the right AI to solve this problem!
/s if that was necessary.
Don't know what you've got 'til it's gone
> Linux utilities, for example, should be much higher status than they are.
The basic problem is that nobody values "free". They (we?) see it as disposable, not worthy of respect. Right up to the time it stops working and then the entitled screaming starts.
Re: Don't know what you've got 'til it's gone
> The basic problem is that nobody values "free".
Sigh. Yeah, I outlined exactly this in my earlier comment but as soon as you mention making money someone will always downvote you. The entire problem with Linux is there's no commercial model that's ever worked to the advantage of the ecosystem overall.
Your TTA is yet another interesting concept to try to get around the simple fact that companies like Amazon and Oracle are LEACHES who earn BILLIONS from open source and don't even contribute 1 bloody percentage point of that income to the people who do the work.
Capitalism at its finest: "Screw you, I got mine - AND yours!"