Satya Nadella decides Microsoft needs an engineering quality czar
- Reference: 1770270377
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/02/05/microsoft_appoints_quality_chief/
- Source link:
Nadella announced the new job and Bell’s appointment in an internal memo he [1]shared on the Microsoft blog.
“Charlie built our Security, Compliance, Identity, and Management organization and helped rally the company behind the Secure Future Initiative,” Nadella wrote, referencing a “Quality Excellence Initiative” that has “increased accountability and accelerated progress against our engineering objectives to ensure we always deliver durable, high-quality experiences at global scale.”
[2]
Nadella’s post doesn’t say why Microsoft needs someone to focus on engineering quality at this time.
[3]
[4]
Surely it couldn’t be because Microsoft [5]uses AI to write 30 percent of its own code ?
Maybe Bell’s needed to [6]stop Azure outages or [7]reduce the quantity of Windows patches that break the OS instead of fixing it ? Or perhaps Nadella needs a lieutenant to do something about Microsoft's recent [8]out-of-band patch spree, or come up with uses for AI that excite [9]more than the 3.3 percent of Microsoft 365 and Office 365 users who are willing to pay for Copilot?
[10]
Whatever Bell gets to do, he reports directly to Nadella. Work In Progress meetings could be fun!
[11]Microsoft actually does something useful, adds Sysmon to Windows
[12]Sat Nad declares Windows 11 has a billion users – just don't bother asking for details
[13]Microsoft investors sweat cloud giant's OpenAI exposure
[14]Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella becomes AI influencer, asks us all to move beyond slop
The CEO’s post also reveals that Microsoft has lured Hayete Gallot, Google Cloud’s president for customer experience, to the company.
Gallot spent just 18 months at Google, having previously spent 15 years rising through the ranks at Redmond to become a corporate vice president, and according to Nadella, played “multiple critical roles in building two of our biggest franchises – Windows and Office” before becoming “instrumental in the design and implementation of our Security Solution Area.”
She returns to Microsoft as the executive vice president responsible for security.
Nadella said these appointments address “two of our core priorities: security and quality.”
[15]
But it is unclear if that means improving the security of Microsoft’s wares, or selling more security products because his post refers to improved sales rather than stamping out shabby software like the flaws which allowed [16]total domain compromise of Exchange, or the mess that allowed Chinese actors to [17]read sensitive government emails . ®
Get our [18]Tech Resources
[1] https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2026/02/04/updates-in-two-of-our-core-priorities/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aYR4UzZQTyVFmzUcgkw4eQAAAxQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aYR4UzZQTyVFmzUcgkw4eQAAAxQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aYR4UzZQTyVFmzUcgkw4eQAAAxQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/30/microsoft_meta_autocoding/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/03/azure_virtual_machine_outage/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/19/windows_11_shutdown_bug/?_gl=1*19r8gqg*_ga*MTI0MjE1MDMxNS4xNzE5OTg5NTg5*_ga_JXW44Y23NM*czE3NzAyNjMxMDQkbzE4MzkkZzEkdDE3NzAyNjgwNDEkajYwJGwwJGgw
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/02/microsoft_quality_control/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/02/microsoft_ai_spend_copilot/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aYR4UzZQTyVFmzUcgkw4eQAAAxQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/04/microsoft_adds_sysmon_to_windows/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/29/windows_11_billion/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/29/microsoft_earnings_q2_2026/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/02/microsoft_ceo_satya_nadella_calls/
[15] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aYR4UzZQTyVFmzUcgkw4eQAAAxQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/07/microsoft_cisa_warn_yet_another/
[17] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/13/microsoft_alleges_china_behind_espionagefocused/
[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
In 2026? Five years late...
They would have needed "Dave Cutler" level in 2021! Seriously! Sadly the original is a bit old to care, and I can't blame him...
Re: In 2026? Five years late...
12 years too late.
If Satya Nadella ever finds out who fired the Trustworthy Computing unit in 2014, I'm sure he'd be extremely angry with them.
Charlie Bell????
Pfffrrrt! Charlie Bell for engineering quality, FTW!?
I think I speak for everyone here when I say SatNad should have right picked [1]Steve Syfuhs for this key role instead. Much more in tune with MS corporate quality culture!
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/04/microsoft_manager_pi_smoke/
Didn't Bill Gates profess to being this?
Back in the day Gates would emit missives about bugs and whatnot, and claimed that he hated shipping buggy software*. Presumably a quick email or ticket from the CEO triggered action/fixes/excuses/whatever. They could bring him back in that role? Might distract him from his ... other ... activities. Maybe.
*I note it didn't work, MS software quality has always been utter shit.
Re: Didn't Bill Gates profess to being this?
"MS software quality has always been utter shit"
I beg to differ. The BASIC interpreter in ROM on my TRS-80 (model 1) was rock solid (well, except for the wrong timing value in the cassette loading routine, which made sensitivity to volume level changes a PitA).
Re: Didn't Bill Gates profess to being this?
Likewise the CP/M Fortran compiler. Maybe they should have stayed with 8-bit S/W.
ohhhhhh, so he's focusing on engineering quality now?
ohhhhh… what were they doing beforehand , I wonder? hmmmm…
They must recognise the Windows 11 rot has already taken hold and consumers are more than happy to move away from Windows.
Missing one aspect, the customer
In a business sense, the user is rarely the customer. And it seems the customer has been forgotten again.
I'd wager "the big money" comes not from OEM, but fat, fat Software Assurance and MS 365 subs. (not looking at IAAS here).
The customer wants reliability, security and manageability as a priority. Security, is of course, multi-layered and can range from hacking resistant to telemetry free and 100 other definitions. Reliability, it is available for use when and where the customer wants it. Ties nicely in with manageability.
I think home users would benefit from that as well.
SatNad knows what the word quality means, right?
....right?
It's not synonymous with anything involving LLM's and generally doesn't involve rolling a turd in glitter.
Re: SatNad knows what the word quality means, right?
Though it doesn't have to be high quality, it could be mediocre or even low quality.
I bet the person who pushed for Crapilot to be used in Microsoft's coding is really pissed they didn't get the job today.
Why? They just appointed an engineering czar.
This is nothing more than firewalling
These two are the future heads to roll, he’s hired two chumps who will take the fall to protect himself and his idiot cronies currently running what can only be described as a shitshow
I'd bet any "engineering quality assurance officer" who isn't a C-suite bootlicker and also want to do their job right, would retroactively ban any "ai" generated bits of software/code, and also ban "AI" in the company while only permitted hyperfocused and fine-tuned LLM's for very specific tasks after a rigorous risk-assesment has been made.
Which means they're definitely a bootlicker, because otherwise, they'd identify SatNad as a liability for the company.
You have to treat AI generated code like StackOverflow answers: They're useful pointers but the code mustn't be copied & pasted into production until you *really* understand what it's doing and how it works.
So, QA is finally coming back
To get to that point, the egg basket must really smell rotten.
I do hope that this new appointee knows that he's being set up as the fall guy.
I'm surprised...
...that CoPilot didn't get the job, given that seems to be the answer to everything at the moment. The fact that users don't agree hasn't mattered so far.
Given the current American Zeitgeist
I would have thought Charlie Brown would have been the appropriate appointee.
Of course Snoopy would also have been a better nominee for National Security Advisor although I suspect they did appoint Lucy van Pelt Attorney General.