British military to get legal OK to swat drones near bases
- Reference: 1770111012
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/02/03/armed_forces_bill_drones/
- Source link:
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) claims that reported sightings of unmanned aerial intruders near sensitive UK military sites more than doubled in 2025 alone to 266, up from 126 in 2024.
Current laws only allow police and certain other agencies to act against drones for preventing crime. The new measures will let defense personnel protect their own sites and operations.
[1]
The legislation is expected to authorize personnel to take out any unmanned platforms deemed threatening, including aerial, land and underwater drones.
[2]
[3]
"Through the Armed Forces Bill, we're giving our military greater powers to take out and shoot down threatening drones near bases. And stepping up investment in counter-drone technology to keep Britain secure at home and strong abroad," Defence Secretary John Healey MP said in a statement.
While Healey's words might conjure up a vision of guards bringing down an intruding quadcopter with a volley of well-aimed shots, the reality is that it will most likely involve the use of radio frequency jammers to disrupt a drone's connection with its human controllers.
[4]
In December, for example, it was widely reported that French marines had [5]"opened fire" on five unidentified drones that flew over a strategic nuclear submarine facility at Île Longue, near Brest. A spokesperson later said the marines had "fired a jammer and not a firearm" and no drones had been shot down.
Last year, the MoD also [6]demonstrated a Radio Frequency Directed Energy Weapon (RF DEW) that uses high-energy radio waves to fry the electronics inside drones. This followed a successful demonstration in 2024 of a [7]high-energy laser mounted on an armored vehicle for taking down drones.
[8]British Army's drone degree program set to take flight
[9]Royal Navy's helicopter drone makes its first autonomous flight
[10]DragonFire laser to be fitted to Royal Navy ships after acing drone-zapping trials
[11]Aviation watchdog says organized drone attacks will shut UK airports 'sooner or later'
MoD spending on Counter Uncrewed Aerial Systems has risen significantly, with more than £200 million ($273 million) allocated this year alone. Recent months saw restricted airspace introduced at 40 defense sites, new guard drones deployed and investment in advanced CCTV and integrated threat monitoring.
Advanced CCTV isn't just to deal with drones. Last year, pro-Palestine activists managed to breach the perimeter at Brize Norton airbase and [12]spray red paint into the engines of two Voyager tanker aircraft , highlighting an embarrassing lack of security and leading Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to designate the activist group as a terrorist organization.
The primary purpose of the Armed Forces Bill is to renew the Armed Forces Act 2006 (last renewed in 2021), but it also gives government an opportunity to add updates where necessary. It was introduced in the House of Commons on January 15 and had its second reading on January 26. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aYHVUs83fUqKMiMkGKPqIQAAA9c&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aYHVUs83fUqKMiMkGKPqIQAAA9c&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aYHVUs83fUqKMiMkGKPqIQAAA9c&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aYHVUs83fUqKMiMkGKPqIQAAA9c&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.euronews.com/2025/12/05/french-soldiers-open-fire-on-drones-over-nuclear-submarine-base
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/17/british_army_drone_weapon/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/12/british_army_drone_laser/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/22/british_army_invests_in_drone_degree/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/19/helicopter_drone_for_royal_navy/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/24/royal_navy_dragonfire_laser/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/12/uk_aviation_boss_says_organized/
[12] https://www.declassifieduk.org/how-much-damage-did-palestine-action-really-do-at-brize-norton/
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Airports too?
The really intriguing thing about the situation at Gatwick is that no subsequent investigation has found any compelling evidence that there were any drones involved. There were reports but no actual proof, which is wild for 2018 when most people had smartphones with cameras in them.
Per Wikipedia: "The investigation was closed on 27 September 2019, citing lack of new information. No culprit or evidence of drone use was found. There are no known photographs or videos of the drone, and authorities have no official description of the drone."
Re: Airports too?
Today’s cameras are too high def.
Any fool knows that the best UFO/Cryptozoology photos are ultra grainy and low def.
Bring back cheap cameras!
Re: Airports too?
The Gatwick kerfuffle was most likely just a figment[0] brought on by mass psychosis ... beware of what you wish for.
Unless you like the idea of the PTB shooting at imaginary things, probably eventually egged on by AI hallucinations ...
[0] OK, some figments.
I bet the army have a bunch of counter-uncrewed notional threat systems ready to go. The real problem is finding a good acronym for them.
They are called "anti-drone drones". Nice TLA, that.
Now make it legal for drones
to be swatted when they hover outside bedroom windows especially if the occupants of those bedrooms are children or women.
There are a bunch of [redacted] squatting in a property near me who fly their drones every day. There has been a significant rise in B&E since they moved in. Drones are perfect for casing targets. Capturing women in their bedrooms in states of undress is an unwelcome bonus. The Police? Are nowhere to be seen.
Re: Now make it legal for drones
What's B&E in this scenario?
Re: Now make it legal for drones
Break and enter I’m guessing
Re: Now make it legal for drones
Breaking (in) and Entering. Burglary
be careful what you wish for
A squaddie sees a drone flying over the airbase. Gets the rifle out.....ordered to use the top secret anti drone tech.
The drone is flying over the hangars.....no don't shoot you'll damage the only f35 we've got.
The drone is flying over a bunker...no don't shoot you'll blow up the bombs.
Ok sir when can i shoot?
Re: be careful what you wish for
One of the problems is that what goes up must come down.
As we have seen in Ukraine it is possible to hit small, nearby and slow drones with normal military rifles, in particular of some sort of round with multiple projectiles is used (like a shotgun shell, but for rifles). But in a closely populated area and no shooting war going on this might be frowned upon.
Re: be careful what you wish for
F35 with weapons are problems the RAF/WAFU would love to have
Make it legal --
-- to shoot the drone pilots.
That'll learn 'em.
Insane they don't already have the power/rights to do so. Anything threatening national defence should be dealt with swiftly.
The Jet-Propelled Guided NAAFI flies again
Those rock buns are lethal.
FFS! Let the airport security/squaddies have a bit of target practice. So long as they are not firing in the direction of buildings.
One bullet for the brains of the drone, and one bullet for the leg of the flyer (if they can be identified).
Posting anonymously as I have taken out a drone that was flying over my garden (the fact that it was with a catapult and frozen Gooseberry, shows how close it was).
Airports too?
Will/is there be similar legislation for civilian airports too? The mess at Gatwick a few years ago was pretty disruptive...