News: 1769426933

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Just the Browser is just the beginning: Why breaking free means building small

(2026/01/26)


Opinion The Net is born free, but everywhere is in chains. This is a parody of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's 1762 book The Social Contract where he said the same about humans, but it's nonetheless true. The Net is built out of open, free protocols and open, free code. Yet it and we are bound by the rulemakers who build the services and set the laws of the places we go and the things that we do, not to our advantage.

[1]Enshittification everywhere, and whatcha gonna do about it?

The ground rules of "open" are like any basic technology. Unintended consequences can make enemies of good ideas. One such is "Like it or fork it." There's lots in modern browsers that people don't like, which is unsurprising with all that tasty personal data flowing through them. So people fork them. They remove the parts they don't like and bolster the bits that they do. Which is such a good idea, there are now [2]hundreds of them . Who wrote them, how different they are, how secure, how buggy, how often updated, how popular? This is not a solution to what ails us.

Just the Browser claims to tame the bloat without forking [3]READ MORE

Taking things away rather than adding yet more of them seems preferable. That's the philosophy behind Just the Browser, a new approach based on the observation that browsers which are part of an enterprise strategy must enforce obey policies. This subservience means turning off behaviors which enterprises might find objectionable, which includes much that individuals don't like either — if only they could get at the controls. Just the Browser makes that happen. A mainstream browser that respects your space. Imagine that. Less is more has never been truer.

Applying that principle more widely is much harder. Data harvesting, AI perversity, misdirection and hoop-jumping make the swamp deeper every day, and that's just from entities that claim legitimacy, the stuff we can see. The sense of overwhelm is ever more pressing, and when that happens there's a standard human response. Nostalgia.

[4]

This is where the [5]Small Web comes in, or at least where it would like to. As a conscious reaction to corporate power running amok where innocent, enthusiastic human exploration once ruled, this goes back to at least the far off days of 2020, where the notion of the Web Revival was promulgated. Drawing parallels with the folk revival of the 20th century, it promised the Web Unplugged, an independent state of small pages, small servers and human-scale peer-to-peer interaction.

[6]

[7]

This idea has never prospered, neither has it died. The Small Web concept has seen various codifications of what it means, what it's trying to do, and how it should be built. The original pre-web pioneers who built the first tools for the first pioneer users are largely still out there, as are those tools. [8]Gopher , the leading content explorer and protocol before it got eaten by Tim Berners-Lee's pet Tyrannosaurus rex, is running just fine through proxies or, for the [9]hardcore , applications — never apps, of course.

You can quickly get a feel for how things really were by dipping a toe in that way, or check on the latest ambitions of the [10]Small Webbers . On the plus side, text pages delivered over gigabit networks to multicore gigahertz 64-bit processors are intoxicatingly fast and ridiculously easy to navigate. There are no distractions. There's also not much else.

[11]

The Small Web is a monastic commune out in the country, proof that you can live free of the modern world, but not that you'd want to. Proponents talk of self-hosting and peer-to-peer as the only topology, which is great for some but useless for most. Self-hosting worked when there was no alternative, when most users were technical enough to get late-'80s networking going, and most hackers were not yet zygotes. The internet in general, and the web in particular, exploded into a vacuum. The Small Web has yet to find a niche the size of a rock pool. Nonetheless, we need it.

[12]Open source's new mission: Rebuild a continent's tech stack

[13]The world is one bad decision away from a silicon ice age

[14]Your smart TV is watching you and nobody's stopping it

[15]Imagine there's no AI. It's easy if you try

The irony is, we all live in our own small webs, infinitely tiny subsets of all that's on offer. Our social networks are limited by necessity, our content sources are self-curated, our daily lives routine. This makes the Shadow Web a place where content can be shared and discovered but where trackers, cookies and big things don't exist. Finding, filtering, creating and curating content, all can be partially or wholly automated, and the better the experience the more the Small Web will become a true symbiont of the Big. It can never replace the Amazons and YouTubes, but it can put them downtown while we live in the parks and coffeeshops of the civilized outskirts.

Advertising tech? Nein danke. Nothing wrong with adverts that fit the rules - text, simple graphics, served by the content creator, just as in print media. Small Web users are going to be smart, high value users, much as those smart enough to get into the oases of airport lounges. It'll be a good place to experiment with all the good ideas that got squeezed out, like microtransactions that let you buy an article for five pennies, instantly and anonymously. Or sell one of your own, by embedding a single link.

We need the Small Web, and it needs to think big. If it's acceptable that AI is engaged in its own experiment in digesting every byte of content on the Big Web, to engage in a human scale, human intelligence, a humane experiment of our own – one that doesn't boil oceans – is morally mandated. We too can rewire the rules of the online world, and the Small Web is an infinitely better bet for a future on our terms.

You can have fun in chains, but only if you can choose to take them off. ®

Get our [16]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/30/tech_monopoly_doctorow/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/19/just_the_browser/

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aXedySxKUgfwiUgmI0y1YwAAAkE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.reddit.com/r/decadeology/comments/18glu56/the_small_web_will_be_the_new_wave_of_the/

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aXedySxKUgfwiUgmI0y1YwAAAkE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aXedySxKUgfwiUgmI0y1YwAAAkE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/

[9] https://gophie.org/

[10] https://www.421.news/en/small-web-what-it-is-how-it-works/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aXedySxKUgfwiUgmI0y1YwAAAkE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/19/open_sources_new_mission_rebuild/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/12/silicon_shield_versus_silicon_winter/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/05/smart_tv_surveillance_opinion/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/29/four_tech_trends_2025/

[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Thanks a lot, Mr. Goodwins! "Well done, Lion!"

El.Mich.

And on that occasion, though slightly off-topic:

systemd by Microsoft's Lennart Poettering is much too big and much too complicated and, at least but not only to me, has more or less absolutely no real advantages and therefore should have to go too and f... itself! SCNR!

[Mr. Stephen Elop too had been working for Microsoft and as such had literally managed to drive the still living though crippling remains of Nokia totally to the ground.]

PS:

Good news!

https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/21/mx_25_1_init_diversity/

And yet . . .

m4r35n357

Nobody (looking at you Mozilla) has attempted to produce a stripped down browser. And appealing to "reasonable" advertisers is naive, there must be NONE. Any concession whatsoever on that will eventually bring us back to where we are now anyway. The entire advertising industry is toxic to the core, and should NOT be tolerated in any form anywhere decent humans abide.

If there is a future for the "free" internet, is will be based on things like Gemini & RSS. The browser is too easy to subvert.

Deshittyfication!

Flocke Kroes

I have been a regular visitor to NPR since some billionaire twit started feuding with them on his antisocial media site. An excellent source of news but the front page takes ages to load. A [1]list of small websites took me to [2]NPR's text only site . It loads instantly and has just the headlines in chronological order so I can read down and stop when I recognise one from my last visit. ( [3]The Register has something similar.)

This has deleted at least 15 seconds of irritating boredom from each day of my life.

Thank you for this article.

[1] https://godteeth.com/lists/cool-sites

[2] https://text.npr.org/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/Week

Taking things away rather than adding yet more of them seems preferable.

Bebu sa Ware

Antoine de Saint·Exupéry writing of aircraft in his Terres des Hommes (1939) equally concluded:

" Il semble que la perfection soit atteinte non quand il n'y a plus rien à ajouter, mais quand il n'y a plus rien à retrancher " †

(It seems that perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove.)

Not that any sane person seriously wants perfection but even a little bit of "retranchering" of the "merde" already stinking out our software might go a long way towards adequately good.

† chapter 3 - L'Avion.

A network of trust

breakfast

I think sometimes about what a network of full peer-to-peer curation would look like - could each person curate sets of resources that they find useful and share that information in a way that allows us to prioritise using the web through content that we or our friends recommend? With the tools we've created for social media would it be possible to span links through friends and friends-of-friends to create a kind of web of trust where we cut the inhuman out of the loop altogether.

I feel like there's something to this, conceptually, but it would have to be a labour of love- it would be challenging to implement and necessarily impossible to monetise.

Re: A network of trust

Flocke Kroes

Sounds like one intent of [1]Mastadon .

[1] https://joinmastodon.org/

some billionaire twit

Bebu sa Ware

I think the US could field an entire Twit Premier League from its billionaire fraternity.

Of course to they would call it "The World Series" (of Twits) claiming complete domination of Twittery.

(Hell ! Who is to argue with that ?)

I guess the particular drongo referenced would immediately rebrand it to Xit Premier League (enxittification.)

Maurice Mynah

Could we have a search engine that gives me the text page, rather than two dozen Youtube videos, assorted Ebay offers and an AI take?

LessWileyCoyote

"Add more lightness, and simplicate". Distant memory suggests this saying came from the aircraft industry. Presumably long since abandoned there.

I remember being able to store the files for a small web site on a single 1.44MB floppy disk.

spagmumps, n.:
Any of the millions of Styrofoam wads that accompany mail-order items.
-- "Sniglets", Rich Hall & Friends