Turing Institute Chief Scientist takes acting CEO role amid defense push
- Reference: 1769082769
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/01/22/turing_institute_acting_ceo/
- Source link:
According to a [1]statement from the Institute, "Professor Mark Girolami will be in post as acting CEO before handing over to a new CEO and resuming full duties as Chief Scientist."
He takes the reins from Dr Jean Innes, whose leadership of the Institute was rocked last year by an intervention from Peter Kyle, then Secretary of State for Science and Technology.
[2]
Kyle had demanded the Turing Institute focus on defense, national security, and sovereign capabilities. That represented a dramatic narrowing of its three-way focus on health, environment, and security, which had only been established a year earlier.
[3]
[4]
The minister had held the threat of defunding over the organization, warning that his department would only guarantee overall funding for the next year, and national security and defence funding for the following three.
[5]Leadership fell in line with Kyle's demands , but [6]Innes announced in September that she would step down "as the Institute completes the current transformation programme." This was pegged for the end of the year.
[7]
At the same time, the board "launched a process to appoint a new CEO who will oversee the next phase of the Institute that will see it step up its work on defence, national security and sovereign capabilities."
[8]It's trivially easy to poison LLMs into spitting out gibberish, says Anthropic
[9]UK government swoons over OpenAI in legally meaningless love-in
[10]What will UK government workers do with an extra 26 minutes a day?
[11]Alan Turing Institute: UK can't handle a fight against AI-enabled crims
In October, it announced a "new science and innovation programme" with a heavy emphasis on defense, national security, and resilience, as well as the appointment of former RAF Air Commodore Blythe Crawford to advise the board.
At the time, it said the programme marked the "conclusion of an internal transformation process" and would be driven forward by the incoming CEO.
So far, though, there's no sign of a new appointment. A spokesperson for the Institute told us the timings for the CEO search were on track. "It has always been the plan to appoint an acting CEO. We'll provide a further update soon."
Kyle, meanwhile, [12]moved on from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology in September to become Secretary of State for Business and Trade and President of the Board of Trade.
[13]
Separately, the Turing Institute has released a new framework and self-assessment tool for organizations "to understand, evaluate, and improve their current regulation processes."
According to a [14]statement , it "establishes benchmarks that enable regulators to assess their own AI regulation capabilities as well as facilitating constructive and precise conversations about potential gaps or areas for improvement." ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.turing.ac.uk/news/acting-ceo-announced-alan-turing-institute
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aXJXwQikQXIQDYnSZ2BxGAAAARA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aXJXwQikQXIQDYnSZ2BxGAAAARA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aXJXwQikQXIQDYnSZ2BxGAAAARA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.turing.ac.uk/news/alan-turing-institute-responds-secretary-state-letter?ref=thestack.technology
[6] https://www.turing.ac.uk/news/dr-jean-innes-step-down-ceo-alan-turing-institute
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aXJXwQikQXIQDYnSZ2BxGAAAARA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/09/its_trivially_easy_to_poison/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/22/openai_to_help_fix_nhs/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/03/uk_government_study_ai_time_savings/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/04/nca_ati_ai_report/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/08/uk_cabinet_reshuffle_tech/
[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aXJXwQikQXIQDYnSZ2BxGAAAARA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[14] https://www.turing.ac.uk/news/new-guidance-will-help-uk-regulate-ai-effectively-and-responsibly
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Ahhh - Kyle, the man who has at least two answers for everything (more if he has more audiences). From todays's FT (archive)
http://archive.today/2026.01.22-001750/https://www.ft.com/content/349f7538-0cd1-4e98-a410-70fe94a4950b
Bullshitter in chief in the current English maladministration (and that is saying something), I am just reassured he is not competent enough to be a threat like Mahmood (current Home Secretary with AI Panopticon delusions and a love for Palentir)
http://archive.today/2026.01.20-114515/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/18/criminals-stopped-minority-report-style-policing-plans-ai/
"Kyle had demanded the Turing Institute focus on…"
Careful what you ask for… there is always the risk, albeit probably microscopic, that you just might get it.
As Sir Humpty might say: "Then where would we be ?"
The wheels of the British government don't fall off, at least not so frequently, precisely because the ministers are so ineffectual and so rarely get that for which they have asked. (I suspect those with more political cunning are grateful for this stagnant state of affairs so they can generally avoid any responsibility. )
Why have we got a Chief Scientist and not a Chief Engineer? Theory's OK but someone's got to make it work. Rocket science is pretty simple but rocket engineering is bloody hard.