UK gambling regulator accuses Meta of lying about its struggle to spot illegal ads
- Reference: 1768891450
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/01/20/uk_gambling_comission_criticizes_meta/
- Source link:
Speaking at gaming conference ICE 2026 in Barcelona yesterday, the commission’s executive director Tim Miller [1]discussed the regulator’s attempts to understand illegal gambling, which is of interest as his agency’s purpose is to oversee licensed gambling and reduce any harms it causes.
That job is made harder if illegal gambling operations offer an alternative. Miller therefore called for licensed operators to ensure “clear blue water” between their services and others.
[2]
He said the waters are instead muddy, because regulators around the world “are increasingly identifying suppliers, affiliates, advertisers, tech companies and others that work with licensed operators but who are also providing the same services to the illegal market.”
[3]
[4]
He then took aim at tech companies which help to facilitate illegal gambling.
“If you are using the same suppliers, such as web hosting companies, as the majority of illegal websites, then you are helping to build the illegal market,” he said. “And, if you are marketing your products through platforms, including social media, that also promote illegal online casinos, then you are helping to build the illegal market.”
Meta’s ‘simply false’ stance
He then segued to a discussion of Meta, which he said often serves ads for illegal gambling operations – some of which use keywords to describe services that do not participate in the UK’s “Gamstop” service that allows people to self-exclude from use of gambling sites.
If we can find them, then so can Meta: They simply choose not to look
“Companies like Meta will tell you that they don’t tolerate the advertising of illegal sites and will remove them if they are notified about them,” he said. “But that approach suggests that they don’t know about those ads unless alerted. That is simply false.”
His support for that assertion is that Meta provides a searchable library of its advertisers.
[5]
“You or I can conduct such a search for ‘not on Gamstop’ sites and see for ourselves how many are currently paying Meta to advertise on their platforms,” he said, and described the results of such searches as “effectively a window into criminality.”
“If we can find them, then so can Meta: They simply choose not to look,” he added.
[6]Meta can't afford its $600B love letter to Trump
[7]Zuck tries to justify AI splurge with talk of 'superintelligence' for all
[8]Casino tech outfit Bragg cops to intrusion but says data jackpot untouched
[9]Digital Isle of Man: For all your connected tax haven needs?
Miller said the Gambling Commission has tried to engage Meta, but “aside from a few warm words we have got very limited progress.”
“Their suggestion was that we should deploy AI tools ourselves to monitor and find these ads and then report them,” he said, before declaring himself “very surprised if Meta, as one of the world’s largest tech companies is incapable of proactively using their own keyword facility to prevent the advertising of illegal gambling.”
“It could leave you with the impression they are quite happy to turn a blind eye and continue taking money from criminals and scammers until someone shouts about it.”
[10]
Miller thinks Meta must decide whose side it is on.
“The consumer and users of your platforms, many of whom are seeking to escape gambling harm? Or the criminals and con artists who are using your platforms to prey on vulnerable people right in front of your eyes and whose clutches you risk pushing those vulnerable people into?” Miller ended his speech with the observation that no actor can defeat illegal gambling by working alone.
“We need to work together to ensure that there is no room for suppliers and other companies who want to benefit from the legitimate industry whilst also actively undermining our collective efforts to tackle illegal gambling operators,” he said. “Government, regulators and industry should no longer tolerate anyone having a foot in both camps. It’s time to work together. It’s time to force them to pick a side.”
A reminder: Meta’s structure means its CEO Mark Zuckerberg holds a majority of voting rights, meaning shareholders cannot vote him out of his job. ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/ice-barcelona-2026-tim-miller-speech
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aW9gVE7lnxrSRDd2pRlEHwAAAAQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aW9gVE7lnxrSRDd2pRlEHwAAAAQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aW9gVE7lnxrSRDd2pRlEHwAAAAQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aW9gVE7lnxrSRDd2pRlEHwAAAAQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/08/meta_cant_afford_its_600b/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/30/meta_ai_superintelligence/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/19/bragg_attack/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/07/digital_isle_2024/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aW9gVE7lnxrSRDd2pRlEHwAAAAQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Duh!
Their response that the regulator can search themselves using Facebook's supplied AI tools is a typical example of their shifting the onus to the end user/complainant, while intentionally making it as inconvenient as possible for them.
That, along with their habit of responding to inconvenient political pressure to be more ethically responsible with token, hollow gestures (often overlapping with the above) is Facebook/Meta's modus operandi since their earliest days.
They've never been anything other than a sociopathic, self-serving company from the start- I saw this even when they were first becoming popular and didn't trust their obvious contempt for privacy and anything else that didn't suit them even then.
Facebook never "became" bad as nostalgic millennials who didn't see the danger back then like to think.
They always were.
Re: Duh!
True, but what's this got to do with an article about Meta and Zuck?
Zuckerberg is such a nice upstanding fella, I can't imagine that he would be part of such illegal activites. Why, only the other day he helped an old person cross the road and rescuced a kitten stuck in a tree.
No ads = no profit
Yeah, like hell they're going to do anything other than pay lip service to the regulator if it means cutting into their profit margins.
A fine per displayed illegal ad and a small bounty for every user who reports one that's found to break the law should help them develop suitable processes really quickly
"[someone] accuses Meta of lying"
Oh my $Deity ! What a surprise concerning a [alien construct ressembling a human being] man who has already had
1) the cheek to refuse to appear before a Congressional hearing (why is that not an immediate prison sentence ?)
2) the ability to lie without any remorse, multiple times, about how Facebook (aka Meta) made mistakes but will correct them, and continue to make the same "mistakes" for quite a while before, apparently, calming things down
El Zuck cannot be trusted, period. It is time to nationalize Facebook, have the Government take it over and ensure that private interests no longer have any sway over how Grandma can connect to her gandchildren.
Oh, stupid me. I forgot that US Government is already in the hands of private interests . . .
Well, looks like you're entirely fucked, then. Good luck.
They simply don't care
Alas, we are in the days where multinational companies believe they are out of the reach of piddly little Governmental organisations. And they may be correct.
Meta is happy to ignore what they don't want to see or hear, and that includes the head of the UK’s Gambling Commission. If anything persistently makes enough noise that threatens their profits; that's what they have lawyers for. If the lawyers can't suffocate it, well, Meta just flushed tens of billions on Metaverse. Fines won't even scratch the surface.
Re: They simply don't care
They're not out of reach, we just need governments who aren't afraid to stand up to them
Illegals gambling ads, so use the laws to fine them, 10% of global revenue is a nice round number !
"Ads"?
What are these things you call "ads"?
Not really.
Miller thinks Meta must decide whose side it is on.
Meta, and by that I mean Zuckerberg, are not interested in sides.
His only interest is in lines, more specifically the bottom one.
From the last time i went onto a Meta owned platform without an adblocker nearly every advert i saw looked scammy. And people I know have been duped by ads on there and ended up buying something which they thought was a one off purchase to only find they had been enrolled in some subscription or received a crappy product drop shipped from Aliexpress worth a few quid that they paid over the odds for though a Facebook ad.
Meta doesn't care as long as the advertisers are willing to pay, im sure if someone were to run ads that was offering outright illegal services such as stolen goods for sale, as long as they paid Meta enough money they would run the ad and only take it down when it received enough complaints that they felt they had to do something about it.
Duh!
Ads generate profit for Musk. Why should he care about individuals?
/sarcasm