New carbon capture tech could save us from datacenter doom
- Reference: 1767819880
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/01/07/new_carbon_capture_tech/
- Source link:
The team, led by University of Helsinki post-doctoral researcher Zahra Eshaghi Gorji, published the [1]findings from their research on a compound of superbase material 1,5,7-triazabicyclo [4.3.0] non-6-ene (TBN) and benzyl alcohol last month. In their testing, the team found that the TBN-BA liquid compound stood out "in both molar and gravimetric capture capacities," and that it didn't react with nitrogen, oxygen, or other atmospheric gases, suggesting a promising discovery for the future of direct air CO₂ capture.
Direct air capture of carbon dioxide isn't a new idea - there are plenty of technologies out there that can do it already. Aside from its high absorption rate - around 156 milligrams of CO₂ can be absorbed per gram of the TBN-BA compound - Gorji's compound is also a prime candidate for commercialization because it releases its captured CO₂ at a low temperature.
[2]
As the researchers point out in the paper, some existing direct air capture CO₂ absorbents require temperatures of around 900 °C (1,652 °F) to release captured carbon dioxide, which makes regeneration highly energy-intensive.
[3]
[4]
"An ideal absorbent should strongly bind CO₂ during capture yet enable its release with minimal energy input," the team said, and the TBN-BA compound, among a number they tested, seems to fit the bill, as it needs just 30 minutes of exposure to 70°C (158°F) air to release its CO₂.
"After the first cycle, the absorption capacity decreased by about 25%, so we estimate that approximately 75% of the CO₂ was recovered," Eshaghi Gorji told The Register in an email. "After the second cycle, however, almost all CO₂ is removed."
[5]
That suggests the TBN-BA compound was releasing pretty much all the CO₂ it captured after just around an hour of moderate heat. Better yet, it can be reused multiple times - the researchers found that the compound retained 75 percent of its absorption capacity after 50 capture/release cycles, and 50 percent after 100 cycles.
Once you've reclaimed CO₂, you can use it to create numerous other products, including certain types of plastics or methanol fuel.
TBN-BA is also non-toxic, according to the researchers, and the material isn't expensive to produce, either.
[6]
[7]According to the University of Helsinki, the team is now working toward "near-industrial scale" tests. Those will require that a solid version of the TBN-BA compound be produced, however, which Eshaghi Gorji told us is still a work in progress.
"We are trying to incorporate this liquid sorbent into solid structures such as silica and graphene oxide to create a solid sorbent," Eshaghi Gorji said. "We also have access to a pilot-scale setup for solid sorbents for direct air capture (DAC), which allows us to evaluate their performance at a larger scale."
[8]Datacenter fossil fuel habit 'not sustainable' as AI workloads soar
[9]Microsoft tempted to hit the gas as renewables can't keep up with AI
[10]AI's power trip will leave energy grids begging for mercy by 2027
[11]Day after nuclear power vow, Meta announces largest-ever datacenter powered by fossil fuels
In other words, while it's a promising compound for future direct air capture of carbon dioxide, it's not going to appear in commercial or industrial applications anytime soon.
Eshaghi Gorji herself is currently on parental leave and won't return to work until October 2026, and while the team that worked on the project hasn't entirely closed up shop, things might be delayed until she returns, at which time she said she intends to continue work on the pilot scale project.
"This technology is currently at the laboratory-scale research stage," Eshaghi Gorji added. "Developing a commercial product requires significant time, funding, and effort. We are working toward this goal, particularly with solid sorbents, but it is difficult to estimate a timeline."
Given fossil fuel emissions of CO₂ reached an [12]all-time high in 2025, driven in part by datacenters that are demanding power [13]as quickly and cheaply as they can get it despite [14]clean energy plans , better carbon dioxide absorption on the cheap can't come fast enough. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c13908
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aV7ll1ep7AKPD7pP5gea9QAAAAA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aV7ll1ep7AKPD7pP5gea9QAAAAA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aV7ll1ep7AKPD7pP5gea9QAAAAA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aV7ll1ep7AKPD7pP5gea9QAAAAA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aV7ll1ep7AKPD7pP5gea9QAAAAA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.helsinki.fi/en/news/innovations/efficient-method-capture-carbon-dioxide-atmosphere-developed-university-helsinki
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/18/fossil_fuel_ai_datacenter/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/13/microsoft_natural_gas_ai/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/13/datacenter_energy_consumption/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/05/meta_largestever_datacenter/
[12] https://www.ucdavis.edu/climate/blog/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-hit-record-high-2025
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/10/datacenter_coal_power/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/08/nextera_meta_google_datacenter_power/
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
I don't see how this can ever be viable
You'd have to move a lot of air through such an ambient air capture device and still won't capture very much since CO2 concentration in air is only .04%. In order to be practical you either need source capture (i.e. put it on top of smokestacks and exhaust pipes) or you need ambient capture surfaces - building materials or coatings that remove CO2 from the air without power or external heat sources. If buildings were painted with paint or roofs were covered with shingles that sucked CO2 out of the air over their entire service life, just from the heat provided by the sun hitting them and wind blowing air across them then you'd have something.
Drop in a bucket
Impressive achievement. Now, let's take a look at the scale of the problem atmospheric carbon capture is attempting to solve. Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, humanity has emitted trillions of metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. Some of this has been absorbed by various natural carbon sinks, but about 1,140 billion metric tons of excess CO2 are suspended in the atmosphere. [1] To absorb that using this compound, assuming it can be used 100 times with an average 75% efficiency, we'd have to create:
1.14*10^18 (mass of excess CO2 in milligrams)/11,700 (lifetime CO2 absorption of 1 gram of TBN-BA in milligrams)=~97.5 million metric tons of TBN-BA
Creating that much is a colossal effort in and of itself, much less the infrastructure required to actually utilize it and sequester the CO2.
Carbon capture projects are frequently used to greenwash the creation of new fossil fuel burning power plants, but I've never seen a credible proposal to deploy it at the scale necessary to put a dent in the problem.
Humanity does have limited industrial capacity, and it takes less effort to replace emission sources with clean power generation than it does to pull the emitted carbon back out of the atmosphere.
Carbon capture will be part of the long-term solution (i.e centuries), but it shouldn't be used as an excuse to create new fossil fuel power generation.
P.S: Those numbers are quite rough, but are accurate enough to convey the magnitude of the problem.
[1]: https://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/the-staggering-scale-of-human-co2