Humongous 52-inch Dell monitor will make you feel like king of the internet with four screens in one
- Reference: 1767708073
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/01/06/dell_52inch_monitor_four_screens_in_one/
- Source link:
[1]
Dell UltraSharp 52 - Click to enlarge
Due out in January for $2,899, it's definitely a more elegant solution than having three or four monitors on your desk. Dell’s 27-inch, 4K [2]Ultrasharps are about 24.1 inches wide, but this new one is just 48.16 inches wide, so it would take about the equivalent desk space of two monitors while providing the real estate of three or four.
With a 21:9 aspect ratio and 6144 x 2560 resolution, this IPS monitor has plenty of room for your work, whether it’s three or four desktops' worth of content stacked horizontally next to each other or a parade of windows on a single 6K workspace. That’s a solid 129 pixels-per-inch, which is about on-par with a 32-inch 4K monitor (138 PPI).
Four desktops, evenly divided, would yield desktops that were each 1536 x 2560. That’s probably adequate for viewing web pages, but it might not be the best for seeing stock charts or wide spreadsheets next to each other. I’d recommend going with just three desktops at 2048 x 2560 each.
The panel has strong specs, boasting a 2000:1 contrast ratio, 400 nits of brightness and the ability to reproduce 99 percent of the DCI-P3 color gamut, along with 100 percent of the sRGB gamut. It has a slew of ports to help you connect to all those devices, including two HDMI 2.1 connections, two DisplayPort 1.4 ports, one Thunderbolt 4 port, three USB-C upstream ports for connecting to computers, two USB-C downstream ports for connecting to peripherals, and four USB Type-A ports for peripherals.
[3]
The Thunderbolt 4 port can deliver up to 140 W of juice to a laptop that needs it. And some of the USB-C and USB Type-A ports can offer up to 27 W to charge a phone or tablet.
QD-OLED monitor targets creative professionals
If you need vibrant accurate color more than you need multiple desktops, Dell’s UltraSharp 32 (U3226Q) could be a solution. Due out in February for $2,599, this 32-inch screen features a vibrant QD-OLED panel that promises to reproduce 99 percent of the DCI-P3 color gamut with a Delta E accuracy score of under 1 (lower is better). It also supports DisplayHDR True Black 500 and Dolby Vision HDR, both of which offer deep blacks that make the other colors pop more.
[4]
Dell UltraSharp 32 (U3226Q) - Click to enlarge
Perhaps more importantly, you can calibrate the display yourself using a built-in colorimeter. You can run the calibration on the display itself, without software, and the results are stored in the monitor’s firmware, so even if you connect it to another computer, it will stay the same. You can also use Dell’s software or a remote console to correct the color.
Like most OLED monitors, it doesn’t get super bright, at least not if you want the entire screen lit evenly. The UltraSharp 32 can reach up to 1,000 nits in a small 3 percent area of the display, about 500 nits in a 10 percent window, and roughly 300 nits across the full screen.
[5]
[6]
I got to see this monitor in person running a demo video and was impressed with the vibrant colors that seemed to jump off the screen. The green feathers of a parrot and the orange fur of a tiger really looked fantastic. Perhaps not surprisingly, the monitor also comes with a hood, something most serious photo and video editors require.
XPS is back, but did it ever really leave?
Dell stirred some controversy in 2025 when it decided it was killing off most of its laptop brands and replacing them with names like Dell Pro, Dell Plus, and Dell Premium. This year, the company acknowledged that it went too far and is going to bring back the XPS line of premium laptops that, for a moment, was known as Dell Premium.
If you were to have checked the [7]Dell.com website before this announcement, you’d still have seen some XPS 13 laptops for sale, so it’s fair to say that the brand was never really gone. However, the 14 and 16-inch members of the family didn’t carry that tag.
Along with its brand announcement, Dell is bringing out new 14 and 16-inch systems, appropriately named the Dell XPS 14 and Dell XPS 16. To really show off the company’s commitment to the brand, the lid of the CNC aluminum laptops has the XPS logo on it, a first.
[8]
Dell XPS 14 - Click to enlarge
Available for sale right away, both laptops will be powered by Intel “Panther Lake” CPUs, ranging from the eight-core, Intel Core Ultra 5 325 on the low end to the 16-core Intel Core Ultra X9 388H on the high end (the 388H will be available at a later date). You’ll be able to configure them with up to 64GB of LPDDR5x RAM that runs at up to 9600 MT/s and up to a 4TB PCIe 5 SSD.
The Dell XPS 14 weighs just 3 pounds (1.36kg) and is a mere 0.58 to 0.6 inches (15.2 mm) thick. It’s available with either a 1920 x 1200 panel that has 500 nits of brightness and covers 100 percent of the sRGB color gamut or a 2880 x 1800 OLED touch screen panel that also hits 500 nits of brightness and offers 100 percent of the much-wider DCI-P3 color gamut, along with an impressive 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio.
[9]
Dell XPS 14 and 16 - Click to enlarge
[10]Dell scoffs at breach, says miscreants only stole 'fake data'
[11]Dude, you got a Dell, period! RIP XPS, Inspiron, Latitude, Precision
[12]Patch now: Millions of Dell PCs with Broadcom chips vulnerable to attack
[13]Dell says Windows 11 transition is far slower than Win 10 shift as PC sales stall
The Dell XPS 16 starts at 3.65 pounds and is the same 0.58 to 0.6 inches thick. Its 16-inch display is available with either a 1920 x 1200, 500-nit panel or a 3200 x 2000 OLED touch panel. The base panel promises 500 nits of brightness and reproduces 100 percent of the basic sRGB gamut, while the OLED panel has the same peak brightness but reproduces the wider DCI-P3 gamut at 100 percent, along with a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio.
Interestingly, the LCD display on both models has a variable refresh rate that’s controlled by the system’s “smart power management.” It automatically adjusts the refresh rate from 120 Hz down to as low as 1 Hz, depending on the type of content you’re viewing. So video and games get the highest while reading emails gets the lowest, most power-efficient mode.
[14]
According to Dell, the XPS 14 and XPS 16 lasted “up to 27” hours on a charge when streaming Netflix at 4K using a 250-nit brightness setting. The company also claims that, at 150 nits of brightness and playing FHD video, the XPS 16 lasted an impressive 43 hours and 20 minutes and the XPS 14 endured for 40 hours and 27 minutes.
The XPS 14 and 16 are available for purchase on Tuesday with starting prices of $2,049 and $2,199 respectively in the US. A 13-inch XPS 13 will come later this year. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2026/01/05/dell1.jpg
[2] https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-ultrasharp-27-4k-thunderbolt-hub-monitor-u2725qe/apd/210-bqhr/monitors-monitor-accessories
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aV1ADWUpTMwko5BdQgx9sQAAAlM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2026/01/05/dell2.jpg
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aV1ADWUpTMwko5BdQgx9sQAAAlM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aV1ADWUpTMwko5BdQgx9sQAAAlM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.dell.com
[8] https://regmedia.co.uk/2026/01/05/dell3.jpg
[9] https://regmedia.co.uk/2026/01/05/dell4.jpg
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/21/dell_scoffs_at_breach/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/07/dell_renaming_pc_brands/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/05/millions_of_dell_pc_with/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/26/dell_q3_2026/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aV1ADWUpTMwko5BdQgx9sQAAAlM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Nah, I'll take the bezels
Exactly.
Their "6144 x 2560" pixel monitor provides a total of 15,728,640 pixels, for an eye-watering $2,899 (around £2,500 give or take).
Meanwhile, my two 24" 4K LG monitors that cost about £300 each have a total of 16,588,800 pixels, have the same footprint, and have three inputs each (2 HDMI and one Displayport), which makes them a doddle to use interchangeably for my work laptop, home PC, and RP-400 that is sat behind them running as a Pi-hole and file-server.
This thing also has a lower pixel density, at 129 PPI, compared to the LG's 186 PPI; simply calling it "ultrasharp" doesn't cut the mustard, and sounds like pure marketing guff.
This thing really doesn't sound exceptional in any way, simply for not having a bezel. A screen of that size would be better off as a curved panel too. (edit - I see from comments below, that this is actually a curved panel; two flat panels at an angle are still fine for me, thanks, given that, at viewing distance, each one pretty much fills your field of vision.)
All in all, this article reads more like a promotional marketing piece than a serious tech review.
Oh, and to top it off, who manufactures the panels for Dell? You guessed it: LG.
Re: Nah, I'll take the bezels
None of that matters. I know there are bosses that will want and will have something like this. And so do Dell.
Re: Nah, I'll take the bezels
Further down: “The Dell XPS 16 starts at 3.65 pounds.” Not sure how much that is in Euros, but sounds on the cheap side to me. Oh, wait, maybe that’s some old-fashioned imperial measurement, that most of the world doesn’t understand well… Was this article written in the Imperialist States of Trumpelstiltzkistan?
Dell UltraSharp 52 is Curved
Missing from the article is that the monitor is curved.
Apple came out with retina display in 2010, and iMAC version 2014.
Yet, we are still stuck with 1080p for many monitors, at 24inches or less.
Also, curved monitors are not what i want - just a flat ultra widescreen 1440p as a minimum to replace 2 desktop monitors. The search options for flat screen only on UK websites is either non-existent, or don't actually work.
Why is it all so crap ?
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 is Curved
Curved is the way to go! It really helps with larger screens, if your accomodation is not what it was.
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 is Curved
Yeah, I used to be a Luddite like you, but it turns out if you're sitting at "monitor distance" then a curved screen works better for anything over 25" wide.
Also, don't buy a Dell... Monitors are the only decent product Samsung turns out.
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 is Curved
I'd dispute that Samsung monitors are that decent. I have had a couple in the past that failed after 5-6 years.
Edit - by the way, guess who manufactures Samsung's OLED panels?
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 is Curved
"Yet, we are still stuck with 1080p for many monitors, at 24inches or less."
Stuck, how? 4K monitors have been for sale since 2001. 43 inch monitors sporting 4K came out 10 years ago. Go out there and buy one!
My $workplace has some HP Z43 monitors and for me the lack of curvature made them unpleasant to use from normal monitor distance. You can move it further back the table - but then you could have just bought a smaller monitor in the first place.
The reason why we still have 1080p is because it is cheapest; enough for the most; many people have poor eyesight, not benefiting from higher resolutions.
I remember the first 4K laptops - pricey, usually handed to the CEOs and such - and the first thing they did was complain how small everything is and then slide the resolution back to 1080p. While changing the DPI scaling was a technically better solution, it wasn't supported by many software back then, resulting in small windows rendered in 4K - and another support call.
Meanwhile, on top of Great A'Tuin...
PTerry's setup was much better...
Re: Meanwhile, on top of Great A'Tuin...
Thanks. I had almost forgotten that... insight #1
[1]https://www.juanjacquesjacobs.com/post/terry-pratchett-7-insights-from-a-famous-author
Given the sheer volume of his output it is a wonder that he didn't wear out the alphabet. :)
[1] https://www.juanjacquesjacobs.com/post/terry-pratchett-7-insights-from-a-famous-author
Re: Meanwhile, on top of Great A'Tuin...
Forgot to do a link: this is his desk.
[1]Article
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/sep/15/terry-pratchett-exhibition-offers-peek-into-writers-own-world
Re: Meanwhile, on top of Great A'Tuin...
I hadn't realised he wrote the books on a typewriter.
The quote I remember was from an interview, I think by the BBC. They showed his desk, with no less than 6 monitors fixed on a frame, with different things on each one. Asked why he had 6 monitors, he replied, "because there isn't room for any more."
One of the things that constantly astounds me, is how much stuff I know from his books that turns out to be real. I also have an interest in history (of all periods) and a bit of folklore/myth - and even 40 years since I first read Colour of Magic, I still regularly come across some aspect of social history or ancient myth that he'd parodied but I'd just assumed had come from his own imagination. I can still remember the first time I read Hemingway, in my twenties, and realised that the weirdly written bit of Witches Abroad - where they're in a village that does the running of the bulls and just carry on talking, drinking, complaining and ignoring the chaos around them - is simultaneously a fun joke, a bit of character development about how the witches warp the world around them and a multi-page Hemingway parody. The scene was already funny when I was 15, and didn't realise why he'd written it in that style, and now it had just got even better.
The man was truly a genius. And far better read than I'll ever be.
Edit: Ooopsie! Ol' Peculiar replied with a link to a piece on the 6 monitor desk between me starting and finishing this post. So I'm now repeating his point. But I've typed it now, so I'm leaving it here. I'm thinking I haven't re-read a Discworld novel in about a year, and perhaps it's time I dug one out and did so.
My main monitor is a 42" iiyama, which cost £380 back in 2020 - its equivalent to 4 x 21" monitors. I don't see how this new one is £2000 more value, although the integrated thunderbolt is very good, I have that on my 32" Lenovo "secondary" monitor - one cable to connect everything to all my laptops is just great.
One cable to rule them all,
One cable to find them.
One cable to connect them all,
And in the darkness bind them.
Behind the desk of Tom38, where the shadows lie.
"U5226KW"
Is that it's power draw?
52"? Meh
Guess I'll stick with my 43" 4K Dell, it's adequate in a triple setup. Certainly a lot cheaper.
Plus when you're using it in quad mode it's good old 1080p not a funny resolution.
Nah, I'll take the bezels
At those prices, I'm good with bezels. I could get quite a few 27" 4k monitors for that.