News: 1767387893

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadell becomes AI influencer, asks us all to move beyond slop

(2026/01/02)


Microsoft CEO and head AI peddler Satya Nadella wants you to know that it's time for the next phase of AI acceptance, where we focus on how humans are empowered by tools and agents and how we deploy resources to support this growth.

Amid doubts that revenue from Microsoft Copilot subscriptions and cloud AI services will compensate for data center capital expenditures any time soon, Satya has some incentive to convince customers and investors that AI is a financially intelligent long-term bet.

Thus he has taken up the pen in an act of "thought leadership," to use the marketing jargon of his company's LinkedIn where he [1]announced his [2]post on a new blog entitled "sn scratchpad."

[3]

Early in his post Nadella writes, "We have moved past the initial phase of discovery and are entering a phase of widespread diffusion."

[4]

[5]

That's fair enough, given that widespread can mean anything. According to [6]Pew Research , 62 percent of US adults say they interact with AI at least several times a week. The more relevant stat for Microsoft, however, is the percentage of customers who pay for Copilot and other AI services. That remains [7]a work in progress .

He also offers a new variant on the filler phrase "it's early days," so often heard from tech execs deflecting inquiries about lack of results. "We are still in the opening miles of a marathon," he opined. "Much remains unpredictable."

[8]

Getting down to business, the Microsoft CEO says that there are three things the tech industry and society need to "get right" in 2026 to make AI return real value for everyone. First, we must develop a "theory of mind" that treats AI as a tool that amplifies humans and products should be designed around this belief. He uses Steve Jobs' famous quote that computers are "bicycles for the mind" as a jumping off point.

[9]Satellite radio transmissions are jamming telescopes and driving astronomers batty

[10]How Microsoft gave customers what they wanted: An audience with Bill Gates

[11]Google snaps up datacenter power biz Intersect while xAI plans more capacity

[12]Safe CEO: AI is an assistant, not a replacement

When Microsoft is having to reassure people that its own [13]research on the labor impact of AI shouldn't be interpreted to mean that jobs will be eliminated, you can see why Nadella might be keen to avoid the impression that AI is intended as a substitute for human labor.

"What matters is not the power of any given model, but how people choose to apply it to achieve their goals," Nadella wrote.

Second, Nadella posits that we move from "models" to "systems" for AI such that multiple models and agents working together can provide value.

"We are now entering a phase where we build rich scaffolds that orchestrate multiple models and agents; account for memory and entitlements; enable rich and safe 'tools use,'" said Nadella.

[14]

So perhaps we can look forward to agents failing [15]less than 70 percent of the time .

Finally, he argues, that society needs to make tough decisions about how and where to deploy AI so that it has "real world impact."

"The choices we make about where we apply our scarce energy, compute, and talent resources will matter," he wrote. "This is the socio-technical issue we need to build consensus around."

Building consensus in this case apparently means [16]forcing AI [17]on everyone [18]despite protestations , expressing [19]bafflement that anyone would reject the technology, and [20]spending millions on lobbying . ®

Get our [21]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/satyanadella_looking-ahead-to-2026-activity-7411490079984250880-Vb5v/

[2] https://snscratchpad.com/posts/looking-ahead-2026/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aVhOCxDWmm5mFOdf0fyk5gAAA5U&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aVhOCxDWmm5mFOdf0fyk5gAAA5U&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aVhOCxDWmm5mFOdf0fyk5gAAA5U&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2025/09/17/ai-in-americans-lives-awareness-experiences-and-attitudes/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/01/microsoft_consumer_copilot_corporate/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aVhOCxDWmm5mFOdf0fyk5gAAA5U&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/01/mitgating_pollution_from_satellite_rf/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/01/microsofts_approach_to_customer_service/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/02/google_intersect_acquisition/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/02/safe_ceo_interview/

[13] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/applicability-vs-job-displacement-further-notes-on-our-recent-research-on-ai-and-occupations/

[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aVhOCxDWmm5mFOdf0fyk5gAAA5U&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/29/ai_agents_fail_a_lot/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/19/ai_force_feeding/

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/23/why_is_ai_optout/

[18] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/17/windows_agentic_os_feedback/

[19] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/21/microsoft_ai_boss_comment/

[20] https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2025/07/23/ai-lobbying-explosion-00472092

[21] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Well, he's right about one thing

BinkyTheMagicPaperclip

"The choices we make about where we apply our scarce energy, compute, and talent resources will matter"

Absolutely, if you're being serious about the environment the answer is 'not in AI'. If you're being serious about not polluting local communities the answer is 'not in AI'.

If you actually want people to learn, rather than regurgitate without understanding context the answer is 'not in AI'

The remainder appears to be a huge number of buzzwords that boil down to 'please buy our AI!'. No thanks. There are some uses for it, but it's wildly overblown, and for most people an improved search engine and spending the same amount of money on community and tooling would generate better results.

If they stopped spending all their time on AI, didn't try to extract every bit of personal data they can, and made local accounts and local hosting and control of your data paramount who knows, I might be less determined to switch to Unix.

forcing AI on everyone despite protestations

Neil Barnes

I can choose to use a browser that doesn't contain any 'AI' rubbish, and similarly an equally bereft code editor, email client, office suite, video player... And that's fine; I do so.

What I can't do is choose not to deal with the misbegotten automated apologies for customer service that are foisted upon us, save by never using the company again...

I'm old fashioned. I firmly believe that a computer system which does not deliver the same response to the same question, every time, is broken.

Jadith

So sorry, I didn't realize he did not approve of the term. Might I suggest the following alternatives:

clankertrash

Microslop

bullshite by the Byte

compucrap

automated annoyance generater

Artificial Ignorance

or, my favorite:

Waste of resources

At this point I would like to open the floor to other suggestions.

If it actually worked

Ian 55

I could see a justification for imposing it on users.

But it doesn't, and the statistics-based LLM approach cannot, work no matter how many billions they piss away on it. It's like asking a labrador for help: it has no concept of things like 'truth' and really, really wants to please you.

So slop it is, and slop it will remain.

Sadly, Nadell will remain very, very rich despite incompetence like this.

lv426_dallas

Why are so many companies pushing this? It's like some important cult we all need to be forced to participate in.

hamakei

Diffusion? No. More like Disillusion.

Choices

Anonymous Coward

"The choices we make about where we apply our scarce energy, compute, and talent resources will matter"

Does this mean Microsoft will make the CHOICE to properly test their products to minimise wastage of our "scarce energy, compute, and talent resources"

Does this mean Microsoft will make the CHOICE to remove bloat in their products to minimise wastage of our "scarce energy, compute, and talent resources"

Does this mean Microsoft will make the CHOICE to only offer AI "features" where they are ACTUALLY needed and wanted, to minimise wastage of our "scarce energy, compute, and talent resources"

Does this mean Microsoft will make the CHOICE to provide meaningful and useful customer support for their products to minimise wastage of our "scarce energy, compute, and talent resources"

Yeah, I know.

Slop

Anonymous Coward

Is AI actually useful - properly useful - for anything else?

Thus mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know
what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true.
-- Bertrand Russell