Datacenter fossil fuel habit 'not sustainable' as AI workloads soar
- Reference: 1763486199
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/11/18/fossil_fuel_ai_datacenter/
- Source link:
The research firm forecasts that electricity required by datacenters worldwide is set to expand 16 percent this year alone, and likely to double to 980 terawatt hours (TWh) by 2030.
It will come as little surprise to El Reg readers that the rapid rise of AI-optimized servers and infrastructure is the chief culprit fueling the increase. Gartner expects the electricity usage from all that machine learning gear to rise nearly fivefold, from 93 TWh in 2025 to 432 TWh in 2030.
[1]
This sharp rise means that AI infrastructure will account for more and more of the total consumption, expanding from about 21 percent of total bit barn power use this year, to 44 percent of it by the end of the decade. At this point, those AI servers will represent 64 percent of incremental demand, meaning the additional electricity required to power new systems added to the grid.
[2]
[3]
But the frenetic pace of datacenter building compared with the glacial pace of power grid expansion means that many facilities face a long wait to get connected, and operators are increasingly turning to on-site generation, at least in the short term. This likely means burning extra fossil fuels that add to pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
The Colossus datacenter operated in Tennessee by Elon Musk's xAI has faced criticism for allegedly belching out [4]smog-causing fumes from its gas turbines, for example. Meanwhile, [5]coal-fired power stations have seen an unexpected resurgence in the US due to bit barn energy requirements.
[6]
Gartner states that the current dominance of fossil fuels in on-site power generation is not sustainable, and that cleaner on-site power alternatives such as green hydrogen, geothermal, and small modular reactors (SMRs) will become viable fuel alternatives for datacenter microgrids by the end of the decade.
"In the near term, natural gas will lead as the main power source for datacenters," [7]said Gartner VP analyst Tony Harvey. "However, within the next three to five years, we anticipate rapid growth in battery energy storage systems (BESS) to balance the fluctuations of solar and wind energy."
[8]Brits to help foot power bill for datacenters under government AI plans
[9]Power: The answer to and source of all your AI datacenter problems
[10]Britain's first small modular reactors to be built in Wales
[11]Microsoft is building datacenter superclusters that span continents
Financial analyst biz Jefferies recently published a report that BESS could become standard at datacenters thanks to the AI infrastructure boom, and [12]forecast that 20 GW of capacity will be deployed over the next decade .
Another recent study estimated that [13]renewable energy sources could power datacenters at a lower cost than relying on nuclear generation from SMRs, which other analysts believe are [14]likely to be a decade away from coming into production.
Meanwhile, [15]geothermal microgrids offer great promise, according to Gartner, but the high initial costs and permitting challenges will likely keep it a niche option for the present. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aRz6h2AMIC9ZKVSh0rs8TQAAAFQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aRz6h2AMIC9ZKVSh0rs8TQAAAFQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aRz6h2AMIC9ZKVSh0rs8TQAAAFQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/02/naacp_musk_dc/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/10/datacenter_coal_power/
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aRz6h2AMIC9ZKVSh0rs8TQAAAFQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-11-17-gartner-says-electricity-demand-for-data-centers-to-grow-16-percent-in-2025-and-double-by-2030
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/18/uk_ai_growth_zones/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/15/power_supercomputing/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/13/anglesey_smr/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/13/microsoft_fairwater_dataceter_superclusters/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/11/analysts_forecast_bit_barn_battery/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/26/renewables_vs_smr_datacenter/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/13/anglesey_smr/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/13/geothermal_datacenters/
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Relax.
The bubble will burst. Shame on the BBC for giving some bloke from Google airtime today, pushing AI.
There is not enough cash in the system to make AI profitable, or energy/desire/utility to make it viable. If you don't get your 'investment' out in time, don't say you didn't have enough warnings.
I'm just watching the introductory sessions of the Microsoft Ignite thing. To summarise:
AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, etc, ad nauseam
FFS, can't they give it a rest!
It's the AI Bubble That Isn't Sustainable
It's the AI bubble that isn't sustainable, from a financial perspective at least. Electric utilities would have to be mad to commit to installing generating capacity that will never be used by the AI companies when the AI industry collapses.
As for that study that said that renewable energy would be cheaper, that "renewable energy" turned out to be gas turbines at the data centres combined with vague promises to buy electricity from wind turbines in the North Sea and delivering it via the grid that apparently can't deliver it anyway. It's just more green washing.
Does anyone think
that these companies that build and run these datacentres think that they give a fuck? They are just parasites.